K32A You can only change the multiplier if you have only ONE Stick of ram in your dimm slots
Printable View
K32A You can only change the multiplier if you have only ONE Stick of ram in your dimm slots
I do only have ONE stick! Maybe i should try another slot. Right now it's in slot 3. I will try to set it in slot 1. But thanks for the information anyway ;)
with clockgen mine changes with two sticks... just doesnt retain the setting after reboot, goes back to 10.Quote:
Originally posted by EmineM
K32A You can only change the multiplier if you have only ONE Stick of ram in your dimm slots
edit: I have SMD grabbers, gotta pick up that variable resistor though.
If I set my MP lower with clockgen, my PC locks.Quote:
Originally posted by SupaMan
with clockgen mine changes with two sticks... just doesnt retain the setting after reboot, goes back to 10.
edit: I have SMD grabbers, gotta pick up that variable resistor though.
But is remember the setting until I turn my PC off.
SupaMan GlockGen is designed to restore your bios defaults at the next boot. So if your bios is 200FSB and you have 3200+(10x) and you set GlockGen to 250 x 9.5 then it WILL reboot at 200 x10 (default).
My system will also change with two sticks in either of the three slots BUT the Gigabyte boards love the mem in the 3rd slot for some reason. Give it a try, I did and got over 10FSB higher just by doing that!
3rd slot eh? ok I'll give it a go. I tried with just one stick (in slot 1) and it didnt really help with anything at all.Quote:
Originally posted by andyddr
SupaMan GlockGen is designed to restore your bios defaults at the next boot. So if your bios is 200FSB and you have 3200+(10x) and you set GlockGen to 250 x 9.5 then it WILL reboot at 200 x10 (default).
My system will also change with two sticks in either of the three slots BUT the Gigabyte boards love the mem in the 3rd slot for some reason. Give it a try, I did and got over 10FSB higher just by doing that!
I figured clockgen wasnt supposed to keep the setting... would really screw people over if they picked a bad one if it did
I was wondering how you guys can get such a high FSB, when the PCI/AGP lock don't seem to work proberly....?
Are you just lucky that it works on that time, when you are clocking, or does it have something to do with a newer BIOS..? :confused:
Mostly luck, and using PCI devices that happen to tolerate such speeds.Quote:
Originally posted by Matshui
I was wondering how you guys can get such a high FSB, when the PCI/AGP lock don't seem to work proberly....?
Are you just lucky that it works on that time, when you are clocking, or does it have something to do with a newer BIOS..? :confused:
I have recently discovered that it sometimes work adjusting your AGP speed throug ClockGen, atleast when I tried another time earlier, the AGP speed stayed and even went down when I clocked my CPU back to the stocj settings again...
Also before my AGP speed had no trouble staying at 66/33Mhz, without adjusting it, and then suddently it won't lock anymore... :confused:
But if that thing with ClockGen works, then it is no problem anymore... :banana:
when you guys say the pci/agp lock doesnt work? what speeds does it stop working at? so far mine has stayed working but ive only got it as high as 240 so i probly havent got to the point where it stops working yet?
peace perc,
they dont work at any speed :)Quote:
Originally posted by Perc
when you guys say the pci/agp lock doesnt work? what speeds does it stop working at? so far mine has stayed working but ive only got it as high as 240 so i probly havent got to the point where it stops working yet?
peace perc,
your software isnt accurately reporting the speeds, to really see them you need a hardware PCI device tha measures them. Look at the anandtech article about this for some good information.
Quote:
Originally posted by SupaMan
they dont work at any speed :)
your software isnt accurately reporting the speeds, to really see them you need a hardware PCI device tha measures them. Look at the anandtech article about this for some good information.
what's the max frequency that you can hit with this cg core supaman? passing burn tests i mean..
crappy... 2.3GHz @ 1.7VQuote:
Originally posted by eviLRuLeZ
what's the max frequency that you can hit with this cg core supaman? passing burn tests i mean..
I'd love to think it's the motherboard, or the memory, but I've managed to rule out both as the issue. The core just wants more juice. Isnt overheating either.
erm ok .. :/
maybe that cpu isnt that good.. i mean the cpu that you received from amd.. but others core cg may be good probably
we'll see that in a little while i hope ;)
ok guys i have had my 64 3200 system now for a week and i think i got the hang of it? right now i can run the system at 230x10 @ 2300mhz v-core 1.55v memory 2.9v everything else auto. now i am ocing thri the bios cause it seems more stable this way? also i had a question about the LDT settings? i had it set to 2x and it ran prime stable so i tired 2.5x and for some reason it shows up in sandra like its still set at 2x plus the memory scores stayed the same? i run the an50r with the an50s00y bios can anyone shed some light on this? also is 2300mhx at 1.55v decent for the 3200 chip?
thx guys perc,
yes
but did you try to hit a higher frequency? higher than 2300..?
1.520 is original voltage for the cpu isn't it?
try to determine where your cpu is stable without changing his voltage and tell us :D
and then tell us what max freq that you can hit with that beast plz :)
yes that soud good Perc. 2300mhs for 1.55vcore is better than any chip i've run before. did you get the stepping before mounting it?
see thats the thing guys when i first got this thing it wouldnt do 2400mhz stable infact im not even sure if it will now? i did have a suicide shot of it at 2400mhz but it rebooted like seconds after i finshed getting the screen shot!! i have been running it at 220x10 for the last week then i decided to oc thru the bios since i wasnt getting all the great of ocs. thats when i tried 225x10 and finaly 230x10 and so far its prime stable and seems rock solid so im just going to leave it at 230x10 for a few weeks to let it burn in real nice :D my voltages are v-core 1.55v (*in the bios windows reports them as 1.52v) memory 2.9v agp 1.60v chipset 1.9v and my LDT auto set to 2.5 (i see no differance from 2x?) here is the stepping of the chip....ADA3200AEP5AP CAAAC 0345RPMW 9457135K 30810 i have only see this stepping once or twice before in this thread. infact when i first got it i thought i had a dud cause 2250-2300 was all i could get and that was using 1.7v on the v-core then i got mad and just set the v-core back to 1.55v and ran it at 220x10! thats how i found out i could run 2300mhz at 1.55v. i had no idea this was good kinda why i asked.... ok guys once again thx for your help you guys rock :D oh one more thing? LDT 2 or 2.5? im running 2.5x now and it doesnt seem any faster then 2x? thx...
peace perc,
2.5 is good except around 300fsb maybe go 2x
edit: actually that's what gigabyte does. i havn't ever had a shuttle that fast
Perc
push that cpu to the limit now ! :D
oh i will not to worry man im not afriad :D just rember guys im on air....Quote:
Originally posted by eviLRuLeZ
Perc
push that cpu to the limit now ! :D
peace perc,
:(
you're on air... i thought you were on watercooling or phase change :(
cya ;)
edit: i can't put an avatar in my signature, why? i mean i can't import a picture..
can you help me?
WOWWW
361.13 and an 8 multiplier
impressive!!!!
TimeF0•ª30•b
Clock(MHz)F2889.02MHz(361.13x8.0”{j
CPUiƒƒbƒgî•ñjFAthlon64 3200+@CAAMC0343WPMW
—â‹pF“º“’“Û•ƒhƒ‰ƒCƒAƒC ƒX+ƒGƒ^ƒm[ƒ‹
VcoreF1.89V
VddrF3.36V
VioF3.70V
M/B(Chip Set)FGIGABYTE K8Npro (nForce3)
MemoryFSanmax BH-5 256MB
HDDFDeskster IC35L080
OSFWin2k SP4
http://www10.ocn.ne.jp/~leader/3200_11.jpg
Just got my 3400+ setup.
Stepping is ADA3400AEP5AP
CAAOC 0351UPMW
9835134L30351 - Malaysia.
Anyone know if this is a nice stepping or will i just have to find out for myself;-)
find out yourself :) the week 0351 chips seem to perform well