8773
625/621 Voltages 1.250, 1.930, 1.908. Stockcooling
Printable View
8773
625/621 Voltages 1.250, 1.930, 1.908. Stockcooling
I got 9222 With 600-700 thats my max @ 1.125 - 2.135v.
Core cant handle higher that 1.125 its sux :slapass:
I whant a voltmod !!!! i don't trust that regulator.
well i got artefacts at more then 550Mhz on GPU, it was ok yesterday :-( its in FEAR, Quake IV ... :-(
I dont know, these XL are weird, they are like never happy girls....
Nope That A14 core sux a bit :D A15 ( XT cores ) can do mush better. Range tho. But A14 just dont like voltage. Try lover voltages. @ stock i could hit 560 then i needed 1.125 in ATi Tool to get 600.Quote:
Originally Posted by spajdr
well .. i run ati tool .. scan for artifacts and it was good on 620Mhz when i set 1.375V only! but then it hangs after 5 minutes (gpu was at 75C)
It was ok before, i guess problems could be in XG Warcats drivers, will try it again today.
Taking 1.125V to get 600, is great man. I need 1.2V to touch 600, at least last time I checked, and my memory really doesn't like going over 650Mhz.Quote:
Originally Posted by Astennu
Hi
I am improving :
waiting for the new cpu "opteron 146" .....
new result
http://img374.imageshack.us/img374/3...16527kc.th.jpg
1,25 2,01 1,955 stock cooler :D
damn, i need 1.15 to get 600 and 1.25 to run 650, i got super lucky with mem, at first i thought it was crappy, but with the right volts it goes to 800Mhz just fine, im loving my X1800 XL so glad i disregarded the advice i got and got the XL over the 7800 GT, though my 3D Mark score is rather disappointing, at 575 mhz core stock mem w/ my AMD 64 3500+ at 240x10 mem at CPU6:RAM5 divider to have my mem run at exactly PC-3200 speeds with 2/3/3/7 timings i only got about 6400 on 3D05 less than 200 more than my X850 XT w/ CPU at 214x11Quote:
Originally Posted by deathman20
l337x3r1cx : what motherboard you got?
Chaintech VNF4, probably the culprit preventing any decent OC, im actually considering a new mobo after Xmas
looks like your PCIE slot is running not in 16X but in 2X .. since i got that score too when i got gfx in second PCIE slot that got speed set to 2X
hmmm, how would i set it to 16x?
Well been messing around trying to get more out of my core. Seems to be that more voltage on the core is a hinderer ot me.
1.15/2.105/2.105V for 600/675. It gives me just a tad under 9k (grrr), but it does well in games. I'll try a cold boot either before I go to work or when I get home to see if it boots at that speed. But its lasted a few 3D marks looping and 30min+ of FEAR and Quake4 back to back.
Seems the high voltage on the core was holding my memory back from OCing. Guess I'll be trying higher memory and raising the core a little more if possible.
l337x4r1cx, are you using OC or ATITool beta 10 for those clocks? Guessing with 800 on the mem its OC tool, try using ATITool, it should improve scores also.
Well new tests, more stable over time. You know all that good stuff.
610.2/675 w/ 1.2/2.102/2.102V tested for a few hours of 3d windows, couple hours of gaming. Ghost Recon seems to be very sensitive to it, damn thing would crash after a few min of game play if there was an issue.
Hitting 9,053 in 05 and 16,839 in 03.
Doing more tests and seems to be running good so far. 615.6/702 w/ 1.2/2.149/2.004V. So far 9,212 in 05, and 17,123 in 03. I'm moving up in the world :)
Seems if my core starts reaching 60C it has issues, but then again that might of been the voltage causing this too. And for some odd reason, AoEIII at default clocks/volts it has artifacts on the screen,the black area's u can see it and sometimes on the land and such, but it runs perfectly fine. Yet if I bump up the voltage to 1.1V there all gone, strange. All other games I had no sight of artifacts.
One of the stranger clocks I had, 600/675 w/ 1.15/2.102/2.102 worked for FEAR, Quake 4, and AoEIII (AoEIII definatlly for extended periods of time), but it wouldn't last 15min in a game of Ghost Recon. I mean come on Ghost Recon? It bearly heats up the card unlike the other games, which I highly doubt it stresses it much at all, expecially things cranked to max, and running at 1920x1200, still showed 60FPS capped in the game (and no, vsync is not on).
hi, i have added a waterblock onto my x1800xl and managed to pull this score
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=1520081
core never goes over 41C and voltages were 640/648 at 1.15/1.95/1.25
Then i am getting an error message that ATI DRIVER DO NOT RESPOND while benching and gives me 640X480 @ 256 colors . Any ideas why is this happening?
Ya thats simple you need more voltage on the core. Your running quiet high on the core expecially with that voltage. I can run 600 with a few games at 1.15 but its not fully stable.Quote:
Originally Posted by ea6gka
I can run 650Mhz on GPU with FEAR or Quake IV, play for like two hours, no lockups .. but then i run world of warcraft and it froze when in heavy battle situations lol :-) and i still didnt get WC, pity.
And of course i cant finish any cpu tests in 3d marks with higher Mhz on GPU ... gives me bluescreen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by deathman20
if i raise the voltage mate , it doesnt even run the first test!:( . 640/650 is the freq i can complete the bench
over than this , i get a lockup, no matter what voltage i have applied. me thinks its a software issue
If you raise the voltage and run a slower clock does that work? Or just anything over 1.15V is crap for ya? I know my limit is 1.2VCore now after more extensive tests :( Oh wish I could use more volts I could hit 675 on the core.Quote:
Originally Posted by ea6gka
if i lower the clock and raise the voltage i still get crashes. looks like i hit the wall
Guess try dropping the core clock... start at 600 and work up.Quote:
Originally Posted by ea6gka
Or does this give a similar result also? Talking long term here not just running 3D mark for the few min it does stress the GPU, unless its looped 10+ times.
i did about 4 times a 05 series of tests ar the freq i gave the score. It completed them without any hitch. But when i restarted the pc , i couldnt reach the freq i was before. Thats why i am sayin it must be software related issue. It doesnt make any sense, bench in X/X freq and after a restart not being able to reach even close to this!?.
Mind you have had a 9014 score last week , the last few days i was tryin to reach these freqs unsuccessfully, now last night i only managed to pull this and till this moment we type i cant pass 610 in the core. The memory though is another issue , behaves like normal memory
and this is my setup , its not a cheapo watercooling setup...
http://img510.imageshack.us/img510/4094/17yf.jpg
http://img391.imageshack.us/img391/8229/1124vv.jpg
http://img397.imageshack.us/img397/9900/1117dp.jpg
I've had this happen a few times. Cold boots seem to really test stability issues with the card if its reliable at that speed upon boot up.Quote:
Originally Posted by ea6gka
Ya memory, voltage is king with it :) Scales very nicely, just too bad it doesn't scale as well in benches as the core does, but in games doubt it makes much of a difference if its 625/600 or 600/625.
Oh ya last night managed in 05) 9334 with 615.6/729 1.2/2.203/2.004V
Dang core won't go higher :( Doh Really curious to how much voltage is the limit of these ram modules. And what truely is the default voltage for these chips to run 700Mhz since thats what its rated for right?