:slobber:
Very nice score guys! I gave it some pimpage over at HEXUS :banana: since it's a multiple of 10,000 barrier breaking score (otherwise I'd be posting WRs left right and center recently :D)
Nice!
Rys
Printable View
:slobber:
Very nice score guys! I gave it some pimpage over at HEXUS :banana: since it's a multiple of 10,000 barrier breaking score (otherwise I'd be posting WRs left right and center recently :D)
Nice!
Rys
Quote:
Originally Posted by eshbach
show me one other guy at 2.56GHz that broke 32k. I know another that did but he needed 2.6x GHz for the same 32k you did on less MHz
Lol, that 2.56ghz class is a big one...
Eshbach's score is a great one, but as he said, it's not a record. Stinger has the air record with a few hundred points more.
WAY TO GO guys.........Europe is coming up I think........ :D :toast:
whooohoooo :eleph: :D :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by hipro5
congrats Ricky, that's a huge feat.. you didn't just get 40k, you almost sacked 41k while you were at it.
congrats guys :toast:
Ricky, Pedro
Congrats guys! Keep up good work and hope for new records! :beer:
No portugal beer in Ukraine, so i bought Corona to celebrate new achievement :) Cheers!
Aye, here's some russian coverage: http://modlabs.net/?id=394 Just posted a news item on our site...
owesome stuff, what frequency does a P4 need to achieve this score....!!!!!!!!!!!
mata2974
Well, for P4EE+875 i believe that 5-5.2 GHz with similar mem clocks (270 2-5-2-2) well be enough :)
wow, 5.0-5.2... those FX-53's really own the EE's in 01 dont they...
whats the highest clocked p4 3dmark01 stable?
I was wondering too, so I did a search in futuremark.
Follow this link hit "Show me the projects" button, scroll a little and you'll see a P4@4585 from Shamino@VR-Zone
This is only for 3dmark2k1 at default setts
no, Fugger have 4677 MHz (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7742771) and my teammate Big_Sam have 4597 MHz
Ricky, Pedro, so, when you will have the system ready ? :D :slobber:
we can't wait :banana: :banana4:
Hiya Macci :)
You should tell Futuremark to update 3D2001 so they can get this score published.
I'm sure you have contacts:D
OPP
I think macci ran his EE @ 47xxMhz thru 3dmark 01 with 5:4 setting..Quote:
Originally Posted by r3b0rN
Always nice to see you around Rys.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rys
Looking forward to your SLi review ( plus overclocking ) come mid October
Regards
Andy
@ALT-F13
You're right...
A little late, but big congrats to you Ricky, and Pedro... the cascades were worth all the hard work aren't they :D
Awesome scores!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rys
it was a great article :) congrats ricky and pedro:)
_zZz_
has this amazing score been published yet?
Nope, still can publish. I finally received an e-mail from Futuremark, hope they can fix the ORB error tomorow :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
what article? link? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by _zZz_
Also a bit late for congratulations , for my country mates .
Go go Ricky And Pedro :D
We want to see the cascades running again at 100%
And Scores
cumps
ORB fixed finally, here is it:
Compare URL » http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8157187
http://home.kqnet.pt/wo034892/1ORB_40678.jpg
:toast:
At last.... sweet for our eyes :)
Portugal and TechzonePT own now the no. 1 overall and no. 1 Single Phase Change
:toast: :toast:
GO GO GO PORTUGAL :banana:
finally you are way way up there guys, congrats on all the hard work, you OWN :bows: :bows: :bows: :bows: :bows:
:toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:
now...where's that 41k score? ;)
Very Nice for The Eyes :) I'm sure there will be more!!
Nice to see it up there :toast: :toast:
Lets see what the usual suspects can do now, that is a big gap.
I'm hoping Opp has a brand new FX55 on order and has his cascades up to scratch ( not that I am biased towards XS of course :) )
Once again, fantastic result.
Regards
Andy
BAH! I am :DQuote:
Originally Posted by zakelwe
I think i'll have to cry! OMG! SICK SCORE!
And the worst is that you havent pushed the rig to its limits yet! :slobber: :toast:
Techzonept.com Team on the top :banana4: :banana3: :banana:
Portugal nº1 :YIPPIE:
cumps :toast:
I never understood what is biased, what is?
graeat work!!
Grats on 40k++
very nice, has anyone reported the bug to FM yet? wanna see this posted on the inquirer and in headlines on other forums :toast:
EDIT: just saw the FM link, sweeet!! :banana:
Pedro, time to turn up that machine that last notch and flex nuts. ;)
bias is when you like one side of something, (in this case, XS, over any other overclocking team) and want them to win 100% of the time.Quote:
Originally Posted by FallenAngel
an example is also political bias. if someone is a democrat, in the USA, and if they were bias, they would want john kerry to win the election, reguardless of what he stood for, or how good a president he would probably make. (please noone elaborate here(political flame war...), i was just providing an example)
do you understand now?
Thanks very much pik-ard
btw, pik-ard stands for captain Picard from Star Trek TNG?
my god, sick score again, I compared this to my ti4200 and ive never seen such long bars! your beating me by a mile in every test, and your nature is over 3x mine :eek: we look forward to 800/680 gpu clocks, 3.5GHz cpu clocks and like 42k ;) also Im sure opp and macci may have a winchester on the way ;)
yes, thats were i got the name. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by FallenAngel
Jason has the same nice boost in CH, but what about OPP´s 38.4k score?Quote:
Originally Posted by macci
Hes at 260*12 and scores 158 in CH. This indicates that extreme bandwidt does not give a boost that big in Car-High.
I know hes running 40Mhz lower cpu-clock, but look at his HTT. If bandwidth gives a nice boost in Car-low, which i dont think it does, he would have been up there with Jason who is running 230HTT.
Im still a bit curious.
Pedro/Ricky: Come on.. let us in on the tweaks. I know you´ve got an ace up your sleve. Give us a piece :p: :D
Its all in the memory timings ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Formann
There is a big difference between standard "2-2-2-5" and what you can do with A64 Tweaker. If your memory can take the super aggressive settings like 2-7-12-2-2-5-2-2-1-1, max async latency 6ns, 5ns etc etc then you'll get a nice boost in car/lobby and a bit in drago too.
The discrepancies you are seeing are probably a result of the different memory settings people are using and some minor differences in their test order/tweaks (car, lobby or drago favoured ... guess which one I use :) )
Good News :)
3DMark2001 has been raised, seems we can bench again :D
Heres is Futuremark's e-mail :
Thank you Futuremark to continue to support the best and most complete benchmark ever made :DQuote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Futuremark Support" <support@futuremark.com>
To: "Pedro Rocha" <PedroRocha@xxx.pt>
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: 40K barrier broken in 2001 - impossible to publish our socre (not CPU variation error)
Hi,
This should now been corrected as the max score limit for 3DMark2001 has been raised.
Best Regards,
Futuremark Support
(unquestionably for me and Ricky 2001 still is "THE Bencmark") :)
Great support, great company ..keep the good work Futuremark!!
:toast:
Thank you CodeRed for your good explanation :)Quote:
Originally Posted by CodeRed
I just want to add your great A64 Tweaker helped a lot to quick selected the super aggressive settings we use on my Gigabyte 939 mobo ..thanks a lot :toast:
now that 40k is broken, do you and ricky have plans to break 41k or even 42k? :D anyone else wanna try for 40k as well? *looks at OPP and Macci* ;)
I was just looking at the 40.6k score.
I have to say that is just incredible POWER boys:D
Makes me want to go out and sell everything I own and look for a 3.4 FX chip:D
Nice :toast:
OPP
wow thats insane he got you in every test despite having a slower gpu although the bars for drag low is pretty short compared to the other tests. This tells me gpu does make a little difference in drag low if your cpu is that fast already ;) you have a gpu advantage so I recon you only need like 3.35GHz to break 41k ;) you have a choice, either get a winchester 3200+ for just over $200 or a fx55 for just over $800 :D which would oc better? you could sell your current fx53 if you still have that cpu and itll help with your upgrade and quest to 41k for top spot, good luck man :D
So, are you going to buy my current FX-53 for the cause? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
OPP
when i get more ethylene we will show some 3.5 ghz powa benches and maybe raise gpu clocks :D
C'mon my bench comrade let's give OPP and the others the oportunity to bench first ..that's more fun :DQuote:
Originally Posted by |RickY|
More seriously we sure need more top tier scores in 2K1, lets all maintain 3DMark 2001alive - this still is, in my opinion, the Best and the most full system challenger (not just GPU) Benchmark ever made :)
If we do this, the nice guys of Futuremark never have the daring to close 2K1 ORB ... well I hope at least :banana:
Don't wait for me my friend, lord knows If I'll ever catch you folks:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Pedro Rocha
OPP
OPP, we have a saying in Sweden; "Everything can by done with vaseline and sheer will" (or Whisky and dollars, but thats another story :P) Anyways, you can!
Quote:
Originally Posted by OPPAINTER
cant afford one, sorry :( try ebay or the classifieds.
"when i get more ethylene we will show some 3.5 ghz powa benches and maybe raise gpu clocks"
dont hold anything back, max out your gpu clocks too, we think you got the skills and clocks for 42k, why hold it back ;)
"C'mon my bench comrade let's give OPP and the others the oportunity to bench first ..that's more fun"
The odds of a fx53 doing 3.5GHz is miniscule and its costy to go thru 100+ of those to find the gem. I had a talk with my friend and I told him its gonna be 5 or 6 months before anyone can beat ricky and pedros score of 41-42k I said itll be till the san diagos before we begin to see many 40k scores since current fx cpus are maxed out. get the highest you can ricky and pedro and enjoy top spot for like half a year :toast:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
The world-wide famous Geforce4Ti4200 previsions, you are amazing really :D :D
Nevertheless you underestimate the tremendous capacity of xtremesystems members like Macci, OPPainter, Fugger, Shamino and others - these guys are the best overclockers on the face of the earth :toast:
I will never underestimate them, checking the best scores, Macci has a 36k score and OPP is ahead with a 38.4k and we all know how hard 40k is. Rickys cpu ocs way better than both of theirs
ricky's FX is a gem , i'm curious to know what this chip is capable in aircool , surely 2700-2800 mhz rock, stock vcore ,with stock heatsink.
What luck you had !!!!!
So incredible chip !! :slobber:
When i think my poor FX53 gives me only 2520 in aircool with 1.65v i want to cry :(
i'm sure my future FX55 will not give me the same :eek:
i think the luck is better than cascade cooling , ricky can owns most of the cascades/fx53 on the orb with this chip with just Mach2 or LS.
I wonder what ricky's fx would do with casade, 3.7GHz? :eek: I think he had 2.8GHz at 1.55v just a .5v bump for that. No other fx overclocks close to that and this is why I think he will have the 3dmark record for half a year till san diago comes
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200
It IS on a cascade, and its spelled C-A-S-C-A-D-E, dude!!! :stick:
If you're going to spam nonsense, at least get your facts straight. I mean, how in the world would you know that an FX would take a 0.5V bump to reach a certain speed???
No need to be rude, I mistyped cascade. And its not .5v, its .05v and I know cause they said so in another post how much the volts was bumped. also I thought Ricky used a plain old prometeia which doesnt get as cold as cascase :confused: