Since its a validation, i would assume similar to the first pic, 1.76V.Quote:
Originally Posted by wtkprol
Printable View
Since its a validation, i would assume similar to the first pic, 1.76V.Quote:
Originally Posted by wtkprol
O woops didnt see that. Thats a nice chip.
:toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by S&M
wow nice nice nice ! 3.7Ghz of pure fx-60 goodness !
thats damn fast mate!!!me nad my mate managed to push his 4800X2 to about 3.2-3.3ghz but my slightly dodgy made water cooler leaked and blew the board and chip and HDD's.for osme reason the ram lived.
im still paying him back:(
*Off Topic*Quote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
Could someone plz tell me how MM got cinebench to show the 26.8? I can't figure out how to get it to show miliseconds for the life of me....
:slap:
That's an Insane Fx60!
Congratz Jason!
TheMeatFrog - new version? Or maybe once you get below a certain barrier it shows decimals? Just speculating though.. dont know for sure.
You had me thinking so I went back and looked at some old ss of CB and they all have miliseconds. Not at the bottom but at the left hand side. Maybe you just always finished on an even second.:D
Indeed it does seem to be version dependent. I was using version 9.5 (latest) and it didn't even show the time in the console window on the left. I loaded up an older version (2003) and it displayed the time with miliseconds in the console window. So it seem to be and oversight by cinebench or either something is just messed up on my end. Weird thing is it shows the miliseconds in the 64bit version of 9.5.
:slap:
Can I call dibbs now for when you sell it:) Those are amazing clocks
1 CPU or x CPU ??Quote:
Originally Posted by afireinside
28s for OP 170 @2.9G (x CPU)
http://img350.imageshack.us/img350/7...itled198ix.jpg
well yeah, thats much faster then I thought from the title, i thought you were saying you clocked it DOWN to A64 3700+ speeds lol - but no, you ran it up to 4 :D so yeah, um, thats pretty fast :D