Intel core duo T2600 VS. FX60...

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

02-27-2006, 10:41 PM
Shadowmage

Crap, that's $300 USD :(
02-27-2006, 11:07 PM
lowfat

wow, nice results... I hope they start selling the T2600s/T2500s in Canada here soon.
02-28-2006, 03:46 AM
kiwi

Only Yonah is on a crappy air cooler and FX needs at least SS :)
02-28-2006, 03:46 AM
Waus-mod

Well.... yonah is just faster clock per clock. I really cant imagine what a 4g+ yonah would do to the orb and to pifast/superpi
02-28-2006, 03:54 AM
stbarlet

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willis

i think both cpu's are on par

t2600-->2.16ghz--2928-768mhz oc
fx60-->2.6ghz-->3379--779Mhz oc

no?:)

yeah but Fx @3379 uses subzero cooling , yonah air cooling..
02-28-2006, 04:10 AM
M.Beier

Phasechange vs. alu heatsink... No difference :slap:
02-28-2006, 04:19 AM
Chri$ch

Yonah (2.99Ghz) + X1900 Crossfire (690/800) :banana:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=157374
02-28-2006, 04:26 AM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by hicookie

DAMM! 21s WITH AIR COOLING........:slobber:

:( I WANNA YONAH...............)

sif you don't have one kicking around somewhere :p:
02-28-2006, 04:27 AM
Harshal

Not really to speak here as all of you are more knowledgable then me, but this thing is simply good. I mean on air 3GHz and yet able to compete neck to neck with FX60 (a cool $1000). I dont understand why not all mainboard makers start making good boards for Yonah.
02-28-2006, 04:30 AM
M.Beier

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chri$ch

Yonah (2.99Ghz) + X1900 Crossfire (690/800) :banana:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=157374

Nice, very nice indeed..

Is your SPI + 3Dmark results tweaked?? - Or just pure performance???

- Dude, you make me stay awake at night waiting 4 yonah :P
02-28-2006, 04:34 AM
\Karting_freak

i wouldnt say yonah is great @3D06.. 10k only. if thats a tweaked run then it SUCKS. if its not then its good, though fx-60 @3.0 is still faster for 3d imo...
02-28-2006, 04:36 AM
M.Beier

Quote:

Originally Posted by \carting_freak

i wouldnt say yonah is great @3D06.. 10k only. if thats a tweaked run then it SUCKS. if its not then its good, though fx-60 @3.0 is still faster for 3d imo...

Dude, do you know a thing about what you just said? :)

730/820 on CF + 3320mhz on a FX60 + a bit tweaked = 10K, just barely..
02-28-2006, 04:39 AM
Waus-mod

On what source youre saying that? all benches i have seen were absolutly faster than a fx60 for sure. And what 3.0? if both @ 3.0 i dont even have to say who's the winner :)
02-28-2006, 04:39 AM
kiwi

Quote:

Originally Posted by harshal

Not really to speak here as all of you are more knowledgable then me, but this thing is simply good. I mean on air 3GHz and yet able to compete neck to neck with FX60 (a cool $1000). I dont understand why not all mainboard makers start making good boards for Yonah.

Very simple. Yonah is a mobile chip for laptops! Same thing with Dothan, we had only adapter and only crappy 915 cipset board with PCI-E.
02-28-2006, 04:42 AM
M.Beier

Quote:

Originally Posted by kiwi

Very simple. Yonah is a mobile chip for laptops! Same thing with Dothan, we had only adapter and only crappy 915 cipset board with PCI-E.

Yeah but...

Seem i975X goes with SLi + CF, and thats quite nice... - This is a very great advantage compared with dothan motherboards.
02-28-2006, 04:53 AM
alexio

A 3GHZ Yonah is about comparable to a 3.2ghz FX60 in the cpu test. Both with good mem are just short of 2500 points. If Yonah does not have a coldbug (it probably doesn't) this cpu is the new king in benchmarking, if Dothan wasn't already.
02-28-2006, 04:55 AM
Waus-mod

intel and coldbug? i only think about a coldboot..... thats suck also! Like my dothan... when running like hell i get a bsod on -189. then have to wait about 10 minutes to go booting on -150. really sux, but hey atleast no coldbug :D and dont have to stay above the -100 :D
02-28-2006, 04:56 AM
dinos22

guys don't forget that dickntel forgot to add 64-bit code to these :rolleyes:
02-28-2006, 04:58 AM
Chri$ch

Quote:

Originally Posted by M.Beier

Nice, very nice indeed..

Is your SPI + 3Dmark results tweaked?? - Or just pure performance???

- Dude, you make me stay awake at night waiting 4 yonah :P

no tweaks, only installed, overclocked (overdrive) and run :)
02-28-2006, 04:59 AM
M.Beier

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

guys don't forget that dickntel forgot to add 64-bit code to these :rolleyes:

Got that in mind, planning using mine @ christmas, and then change it with another one :)

64bit wont be used before 2007 some time..
02-28-2006, 05:00 AM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by M.Beier

Got that in mind, planning using mine @ christmas, and then change it with another one :)

64bit wont be used before 2007 some time..

i guess but it's just DUMB from them not to add 64-bitness to them :slap:
02-28-2006, 05:01 AM
Waus-mod

Quote:

Originally Posted by M.Beier

Got that in mind, planning using mine @ christmas, and then change it with another one :)

64bit wont be used before 2007 some time..

And this proves the 64bit (without using xp 64bit) has no use (if you get what i mean) this 32bit cpu simply rocks!
02-28-2006, 05:13 AM
M.Beier

Quote:

Originally Posted by Waus-mod

And this proves the 64bit (without using xp 64bit) has no use (if you get what i mean) this 32bit cpu simply rocks!

Yeah, and even with 64bit, its not 2x speed... - Just bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: ;) - Sis sandra @ winXP 64bit is a bit higher than 32bit on a 64bit cpu, but freaking aint 2* performance..
02-28-2006, 05:43 AM
hicookie

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

sif you don't have one kicking around somewhere :p:

:( no apoen i975xa-ydg.....now we afraid would waiting for two weeks...

Gee....yonah looks great:D
02-28-2006, 06:21 AM
Ludus

there are problem with CB? if not is the perfect cpu :slobber:

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:13 AM.

XtremeSystems