Something new, something looking very promising.
Stickied.
Printable View
Something new, something looking very promising.
Stickied.
anyone tested the new bios for P5WD2 Premium?
My 955XE runs stable @ 12x380Mhz (Board without any Mods!)!
PS: i can boot with 380Mhz FSB!
here is the bios
Bios Download 0704
What are the changes for this new bios?
i dont find a changelog :(
i havent a clue, but im about to try it out!Quote:
Originally Posted by Jupiler
d94, let me know if it works out...just finished reinstalling the vdroop...
i just updated the bios and so far so good i guess. i saw that they updated the Intel logo, becuase before it showed me the intel pentium 4 EE logo, but now it shows the new intel logo, "intel pentium inside"
Thanks for posting, I will give it a shot tonight...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chri$ch
http://img490.imageshack.us/img490/7...agem0967xu.jpg
boot @ 300 fsb @ 1.475v
http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/576...ios07046qr.jpg
2 cores needs 1.5125v to run cinebench
http://img57.imageshack.us/img57/314...nebench7ep.jpg
max clock is 4570mhz :(
Bios 0519
4600mhz @ 1.5125v
http://img295.imageshack.us/img295/5...00mhzpi9hh.jpg
suicide screen @ 1.55v
http://img295.imageshack.us/img295/4...4716mhz7bc.jpg
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=63969
so your sayin 519 is the best bios atm? :)Quote:
Originally Posted by PcCI2iminal
i should give it a shot!
i also updated to the new one..nothin special just now i see the new intel logo lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by d94
the new logo is cool
very strangeQuote:
so your sayin 519 is the best bios atm? :)
im usin the same settings for both and can't bench with 2 cores @ 4450mhz @ 1.51v @ 0519 ,i can do it @ 0704 but for max clock 0509 clocks better for me(fsb limit with 0704?).
im waiting for screensQuote:
i should give it a shot!
GL
why cinebench benchmark (35secs) looks low for 4.4Ghz ? :S or is it just me?... was expecting to be at 30-32secs range :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by Byron
the score is ok ,using the same sets a 4.4ghz EE plus 2 virtual core can do 32-33sek
my FX needs 3150 mhz to finish in 1minute......
http://img489.imageshack.us/img489/6...nchfx572ac.jpg
Wow, nice results guys! Looking forward to seeing some Cedarmill (considering picking one up eventually) :D
Got two questions;
What did boostedevo use as cooling and what did PcCI2iminal use for his superpi screen?
Will update the front post now! Thanks for sticky Jupiler!
PCMark04
d94 920 4514.60 MHz @ 1.51v Watercooled
THat links to a 4402 PCMark04 shot
Good job guys.
my bad :PQuote:
Originally Posted by vapb400
here's a new one @ 4.5
http://img343.imageshack.us/img343/9...0stable4aw.jpg
Thx changed it. So is there anyone with a Cedar Mill yet? :D
so, new results...
Sys:
P-D 955XE @ 14x353,4Mhz (4948,2Mhz / Watercooled)
2x1GB MDT DDR2-667 @ 353,4Mhz 4-4-4-8
Club3D X1800XT @ 780/900 (Watercooled)
ASUS P5WD2 Prem. Bios 0704 (without any Mods)
Win2k3
http://www.muenster.de/~e30pics/Bild...perPi-4950.jpg
http://www.muenster.de/~e30pics/Bild...ark05-4950.jpg
http://www.muenster.de/~e30pics/Bild...bench-4950.jpg
PcCI2iminal,
was comparing the 9x0 with X2 cpu's ... :S got any screenshot of X2 with cinebench ?
Cheers
How is the 955XE compared with say a 930 at the same clocks?
Quote:
Originally Posted by NiCKE^
watercooler for 4.6ghz and Pi screen
i have no dual core from AMD maybe a X2 @ 3.1ghz+ can do it in 33sekQuote:
Originally Posted by Byron
Chri$ch
nice scores :toast:
Those benches were on a low clock with phase, but it was completely benchable at 4.3 on water. On that 930, I never used more than 1.50Vc unfortunately...could easily be looking at 4.5-4.6GHz stable on water/4.8-4.9GHz stable on phase with 1.55Vc.Quote:
What did boostedevo use as cooling
The 930 (and the 661 I am working on now) just don't repsond as well to phase as my Prescotts that would give 600-1GHz more OC over water. Cedar Mill/Presler are looking more like only 300-600MHz more over water. Cooling aside, past the 5GHz level, it's really more like how much Vc you're willing to throw at it, no matter what your cooling it with.
Both the Presler and Cedar Mill I have seem to do very well on water, which may be why the phase OCs aren't as much. The 661 completes PCMark04 with a score @ 5GHz and 1.55Vc ON WATER and 5.2 is a suicide shot there. As you can see, I am not limiting myself so much on Vc as I did with the 930 :) I am thinking about trying up to 1.60Vc for a few quick pulls on phase.
What is also impressive is just how stable the Cedar Mill cores are so close to max....completely bencheable/stable within just 100-200MHz of where it will totally crap out regardless of cooling.
what.s your max prime stable ?Quote:
Originally Posted by boostedevo
I don't fold, nor do I run daily OCs very close to max OC, so I could give 2 craps about P95x2 for a week before consideing it stable. PCMark04 is almost as effective and takes a lot less time ;) I've seen quite a few "P95 stable" OCs that FAIL PCMark04 (finishes it, but with no score).
To that end, 5.3GHz is the highest I've finished multiple PCMark04s in a row with scores @ 1.55Vc on phase and does it easily. 5.4GHz finishes, but with no score, so unless I add some more Vc, that 5.3GHz is probably about it.
5.0GHz on water @ 1.55Vc finishes with scores, but I can tell it's definitely a chore for it there....4.8-4.9GHz would be a breeze.
I am also still working with the dual rail OCZ 600W PSU. I don't know if it's any kind of hang up at this point, but my new 38A single rail should be here Tues. With any kind of luck, it will help out OCs if only a little bit.