PCMark05 Results ...

cracks the 5k barrier with OCZ PC3500 PLAT LE BH-5 :D

PCmark05 = 5,009
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=21327

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...10_5009_tn.jpg

Here's my updated score: 5136 (broke 5k with mild overclocking) :p:

SamHughe

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by eva2000

you know why,

1. multi-threaded tests you'd win easily and boosts P4 systems
2. the hdd related tests skew the results i.e. raid 0 will give you at least 200+ extra pts

using my spreadsheet calculator http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?t=787

if i raid 0 my system my HDD Virus scan test will jump from 15.41MB/s to 32MB/s which equates to jump from 4787 to 5010! :eek:

---

Yeah, A64 can't really compete with multi-threaded cpus (overall score)

I get only 4657 at 2.9Ghz 2.5-3-3-6 and raid 0
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=24695

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by [Cipher]

yes, you missed the bug.

check page 1 ( i think it's mentioned inside this topic )

---

i cant see anything... anyone got a link to a fix???

6534 (X2 4400+ @ 2820Mhz)

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=12734

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Peen

I know when my system is stable, thank you. It runs prime95 24hrs+ and games all the time and encodes when its not gaming. It has never crashed once. Im blaming the benchmark :rolleyes:

---

i agree. i am able to run at the settings in my sig all day. 3dmark 03 and 05, AM3, PCmark04, sandra, all right after the other stable as can be. looking back though, 3DMark05 did the same thing to me until they came out with the patch. hopefully a revision of some sort will fix the weird problem :slap:

New Score:14183


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=28449


Rig: 3,2 Xtreme Edition 840, 2x7800GTX, RAID 0 and.... Gigabyte i-RAM
It is a valid result, although the RAM Drive gives EXTREME FAST numbers.

extreme fast... damn thats twice as fast as the next highest score... infact its higher then 04 highest score

ramdisks are :cool: :D

4733
P4 570J Abit Fatal1ty AA8XE XFX 6800U/512MB

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=25487
AMD Athlon XP 2800 and FX5200

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dimcar

New Score:14183


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=28449


Rig: 3,2 Xtreme Edition 840, 2x7800GTX, RAID 0 and.... Gigabyte i-RAM
It is a valid result, although the RAM Drive gives EXTREME FAST numbers.

---

Ramdisks are amazing can I ask where you bought that from or was it given to you for a review

Got it for review... Not yet available in the market.

About the iRam, what memory are you running on it ? PC3200 ? I've seen that Gigabyte updated his specs to support 8Gb, is this right ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dimcar

Got it for review... Not yet available in the market.

---

Does it run SATA II ? Otherwise you'd need quite a lot of those drives to get more than 1GB/S through put.

If it's not SATAII how have you configured it ?

Ι think he is using software....not hardware.....:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GoriLLakoS

Ι think he is using software....not hardware.....:)

---

Well the Gigabyte iRAM IS hardware. But the score seems a bit high for SATA.

If it doesnt use sata II there would be a major bottleneck so I would say it should support sata II

It's just that in the specifications that have been made public nothing has been mentioned about SATA II support.

But I agree it seems stupid to make a drive like that and not make it SATA II

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kristian

Does it run SATA II ? Otherwise you'd need quite a lot of those drives to get more than 1GB/S through put.

If it's not SATAII how have you configured it ?

---

Sorry for the misleading post.... I just got confused between many scores of iRam and soft ramdrive and having a job in the same time.... :confused:
This result IS with a soft ramdrive.. iRam is scoring lower...
Sorry again and Kristian sorry for not replying to your mail but i had TOO muck work today and a lot of meetings...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dimcar

Sorry for the misleading post.... I just got confused between many scores of iRam and soft ramdrive and having a job in the same time.... :confused:
This result IS with a soft ramdrive.. iRam is scoring lower...
Sorry again and Kristian sorry for not replying to your mail but i had TOO muck work today and a lot of meetings...

---

That's ok. Which program are you using to make the ram disk ?

QSoft ramdisk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by agenda2005

At your clock speed on A64(2840MHz) and the high speed low latency memory you are scoring about the same thing as someone with P4 EE at 3200MHz. That is insane!
A 2800MHz A64 should give an EE at 4.2GHz a run for its money.
This benchmark is bogus to say the least. When A64 X2 users shattered the PCMARK 04, so the only thing they could do to save the intel users(after they clock the CPUs to the limit without catching up) is to re-compile the code and name it PCMARK05.

WHAT A BOGUS BENCHMARK.

I learnt Sandra 2005 was recompile with an intel compiler and that's why we are seeing Prescott having better scores on them. It's a SHAME on all these people.

---

Oh please... :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sucka

My best so far.

http://suckasd.com/computer/toledo/pcmark05.jpg

---

nice 7200+

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dimcar

QSoft ramdisk

---

are you sure about that one ;)