Jesus nice results :D:D 300fsb with 2.5-3-3-7 is just so sexy, I could use that :D
Printable View
Jesus nice results :D:D 300fsb with 2.5-3-3-7 is just so sexy, I could use that :D
I voted no. The new TCCD just isn't the same stuff that everyone thinks it is. Not only that, but TCC5 binned by OCZ will run just as well as the TCCD binned in the same category by OCZ, just the TCC5 will cost less.
just got pair of these. Never had tccd before, this is my second ram, i had hynix d43 before. here a screenie:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...id=33207&stc=1 Don't be scared of 283 fsb. This is on crappy winny cbbid; it's the max on my cpu :( . On friend's cpu i did 320fsb@2.5-4-3-7 at 2.9v easily (DDR640 is sweet)
302 please :DQuote:
Originally Posted by 4rory
And I still expect to see 303 or even 304. It was very hot (32ºC) when I took that screen.
If OCZ can find some TCCD like this, the price difference is more than fair. I haven't seen any TCC5 achieving this kind of result (unfortunately I can't test the 2.5-4-3 max because my DFI craps out at 315fsb).
But as someone has said, newer TCCD may not be as god as the old one (which curiously is still out there for sale) and in the end perform like TCC5.
I vote no.
I believe OCZ does a great job speedbinning the IC's.
So if you only get the good TCC5 ic's , why pay more for TCCD?
Well it is always nice to have a choice :) I vote yes
Case in point: OCZ VX4000 and Mushkin Redline 4000 ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtoe