I'm back - how do You think about 12 x 279 at CAS 1,5 ???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jort

for browsing XS ^^

---

:D That's right mate............ :p:

:toast:

:D UPDATE - small improvement here, notice the chipset and LDT voltage - no need to raise at all:

http://img173.echo.cx/img173/6120/251889mh.jpg

http://img173.echo.cx/img173/1885/3360temps5ih.jpg

:toast:

wow, nice. Does that Mach II gt have any mods? If not, send it to Chilly and get it stable @ 3500 mhz.

MMMMMMMM, CAS 1.5 @ 280 = Beefy :banana:

Getting nice now HCC :toast: What's your Everest latency and R/W at now?

This is where I'm at so far, 2x512MB Corsair BH-6 at 260Mhz 2-2-2-5 3.31V 33.7ns Latency with CPU @ 2340 (I just deleted the middle to make it under 200Kb):

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HiJon89

This is where I'm at so far, 2x512MB Corsair BH-6 at 260Mhz 2-2-2-5 3.31V 33.7ns Latency with CPU @ 2340 (I just deleted the middle to make it under 200Kb):

---

:D Try trfc 12/13 and cas 1,5........ ;)

:toast:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HARDCORECLOCKER

:D That's right mate............ :p:

:toast:

---

Brilliant :D

But just "pumping" up the 6600GT would be nice in 01SE :)

Wow, it's stuff like this that is pushing me towards buying some bh-5 for my new rig! Awesome overclock. :toast:

Nice score, but why CL1.5 ?

http://members.lycos.co.uk/m4rd0k/CL1.5.png
http://members.lycos.co.uk/m4rd0k/CL2.0.png

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mardok

Nice score, but why CL1.5 ?

http://members.lycos.co.uk/m4rd0k/CL1.5.png
http://members.lycos.co.uk/m4rd0k/CL2.0.png

---

you can't change Cas latency in windows with A64Tweaker,
that's why there's no difference.

@Jack:
OK, but i don’t change in widnows, only in Bios…

Mardok,

Cas 1.5 won't effect Sandra as you have shown, but if you check Everest Latency, and SuperPi, I think you will see the improvements 1.5 will make.

Maybe I am off base but.......

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jack

you can't change Cas latency in windows with A64Tweaker,
that's why there's no difference.

---

Really now? Because I can. And the difference is reported in every other program that monitors the ram timings.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RyderOCZ

Mardok,

Cas 1.5 won't effect Sandra as you have shown, but if you check Everest Latency, and SuperPi, I think you will see the improvements 1.5 will make.

Maybe I am off base but.......

---

It helps latencies and bandwidth a little if you can find the right timings/settings to go with it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RyderOCZ

Mardok,

Cas 1.5 won't effect Sandra as you have shown, but if you check Everest Latency, and SuperPi, I think you will see the improvements 1.5 will make.

Maybe I am off base but.......

---

small difference, but difference

http://members.lycos.co.uk/m4rd0k/xs/CL1.5.png
http://members.lycos.co.uk/m4rd0k/xs/CL2.0.png

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...775#post841775 :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RyderOCZ

Mardok,

Cas 1.5 won't effect Sandra as you have shown, but if you check Everest Latency, and SuperPi, I think you will see the improvements 1.5 will make.

Maybe I am off base but.......

---

:D True.......... :clap:

:toast:

Dynamic Idle Cycle Counter!!! :p:

also, i doubt the same would go for you, but i find that a trtw of 3 is just a smidge faster in latency, but an equally small amount less bandwidth

:clap: hmm hardcoreclocker: Im getting close to youre ram settings.

also with 3.7v, bios wont let me boot after 3.7v. Need to flash bios soon.

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=15500

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Waus-mod

:clap: hmm hardcoreclocker: Im getting close to youre ram settings.

also with 3.7v, bios wont let me boot after 3.7v. Need to flash bios soon.

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=15500

---

:D What BIOS are You using? Try 331-1 - working good for BH-5 !!!

I also can get 283 CAS 1,5 but there is no sense for me - my chip maxes out at 12 x 280.

:toast:

and that is a nice clocks there, well done hcc :toast: