I thought the diego fx55 will come first? Maybe amd had a change of plans and decided to call it 4200+ instead and just release the fx57 early? cant wait for overclocks and 3dmark results
Printable View
I thought the diego fx55 will come first? Maybe amd had a change of plans and decided to call it 4200+ instead and just release the fx57 early? cant wait for overclocks and 3dmark results
"There will probably be FX-55 90 nm... so no way it will be like 4200 > FX-55"
I think the 4200 will replace the fx-55 much like the 4000 replaced the FX-53. AMD will use only 'one' FX badge as their top of the line chip. Thus the FX-57 and nothing else, to keep things less confusing :rolleyes:
the first link has NEGATIVE stock? Does that mean preorders? Damn even if one of these things came out, i gotta wit for my G5 from Cathar.
one thing I wonder, will we need a bios update to make it work with diego and venice? are new bios out yet for those cpus?
that first site.. i've seen it before, but it looks different now. and they still have the box codes wrong, it should be ADA3x00BPBOX.Quote:
Originally Posted by cupra
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodman
maybe amd would release the fx-57 a lil earlier and hopefully later in the year there will be a fx-59 dual core...so for the first time 2 fx cpus at the same time?
FX should stay single-core as the highest performing CPU. A64's will go dual-core.
subscribed
I agree, but according to all roadmaps I've seen this isn't the case. Actually, if I'm not misstaken, won't the FX-59+ series be the only dual cores on S939?Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanAndreevich
Moreover, I'm a student too, yet I could "easily" afford (matter of definitions) stuff like the FX by working hard. Right now I'm only waiting for the FX-57, then it's sweet new riggy time. (Gonna get me some sort of vapo/prometeia too, if sub-zero bug has been fixed. Cascade would be a bit out of my budget, though. lol) :toast:
Edit: The biggest problem for me, though, is the two main characteristics of Sweden:
1) Unavailability.
2) Taxes - I only get to buy computer parts for ~42% of my earned income (rest = ~58% is lost to taxes - and yes, I am a low-income earner :rolleyes: )
AFAIK AMD confirmed that FX will stay single-core and dual-core will debut @ 2.4 GHz in the A64 flavour on the desktop ;)
Then what about Toledo?Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanAndreevich
That would be the dualcore, ie its not going to be an FXQuote:
Originally Posted by krille
any infos about FX57?? when he comes out??
maybe 4/15
:D Who buys first and does the tests on single phase........ ???Quote:
Originally Posted by xgman
:toast:
According to this sticky here over at EOFC, Toledo will be FX. But, I too understand that isn't fool-proof evidence...Quote:
Originally Posted by Sentential
http://forums.extremeoverclocking.co...chmentid=57162
http://forums.extremeoverclocking.co...chmentid=57257
According to these roadmaps too, it looks like Toledo is going to be FX. And I think I've read it somewhere else, as well. However, if you've got better knowledge, enlighten me, please.
yeah, thats very good, thx :banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by xgman
hope thats a killer cpu :D
He needs to update some of that info, he shows the 4200+ as being Venice core. 4400+ as venice too (Not sure about that). Also, all the prices are very out of date.Quote:
Originally Posted by krille
Very good read though all-in-all
:D We already have a lot of killers here yet - has to be an overkiller so.....Quote:
Originally Posted by FX Freak
:toast:
I was under the impression that Toledo was simply the Dual-Core chips that would support DDR whether it was FX or A64.
your FX55 is very nice :DQuote:
Originally Posted by HARDCORECLOCKER
according to this, the toledo's will be called athlon 64 d's (similar to pentium D's?)Quote:
Originally Posted by krille
LOL!! Athlon 64 D. Well, at least better than aEC2T (AMD Extended Core Dual Technology :banana: ).Quote:
Originally Posted by pik-ard v1.1
Sorry for doublepost mods, but according to that, the Toledo has a huge 2MB L2-cache - now that smells FX long way.