X850XT PE problems

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

02-11-2005, 08:12 PM
jikdoc

thanks pc_ice. any idea what clocks to expect with normal watercooling on 1.7 core? i like your mod!
02-11-2005, 08:31 PM
mikead_99

misteroadster:
I'll go ahead and give you this as a comparison point. This is from that all stock clock XP run I did earlier.
http://mysite.verizon.net/res6otqr/s...WinXPStock.jpg

Your cpu tests look fine, at least compared to mine, but the ones that use some gpu (drags and nature) seem to be where you are getting dinged. Makes it a bit tougher to point to mobo bios or gfx card. I know AGP b/w could affect those tests, could be something with the pci-e bus. Just to finish fleshing out the picture, mine was run with SP2 and 9.0c. Cat 5.1's as mentioned earlier. Hope you get it sorted, without having to go to a second mobo, I've been there before. I'll post up again if I find any bios settings that obviously impact the tests you are hit on. Might give you some more insight.

edit to add: I did find a few hundred more points in bios, but only in the spots you were doing OK already. Don't think that'll help.
02-11-2005, 08:44 PM
Onepagebook

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

Strange 2001 ranking :
OPB(DFI) and Pinto(MSI) sucks a lot but Jason(DFI)result is good with a winnie.
Herms(DFI) result is not so bad but not great.
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadste...llX8502001.JPG

Thank you:D
that 35770is just not a "serious play"
if I got cascade on that, you probably won't see my name there in the 30k range. All my 3d bench are all done by just watercooling :banana: :banana: :banana:

you know what? if you speak more friendly, I will highly appreciate that. :toast:
02-12-2005, 12:19 AM
Geforce4ti4200

here is what a stock fx55 and stock x800xt PE should get:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8266139

from Macci none the less. 32.2k if your getting below 32k then somethings wrong and/or you are missing alot of tweaks. I also couldnt help but notice your winny was 289fsb vs. 200fsb for your fx55 so hence why the difference is only 1100. Your ram bandwith for the winny was probably higher.
02-12-2005, 02:22 AM
misteroadster

Ok , thanks geforce but i'm in desynch 133++ , so i think my ram is pretty close to 200 Mhz , my bandwith is not improved.
Mikead big thanks too ;)
:toast:
02-12-2005, 02:27 AM
misteroadster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Onepagebook

Thank you:D
that 35770is just not a "serious play"
if I got cascade on that, you probably won't see my name there in the 30k range. All my 3d bench are all done by just watercooling :banana: :banana: :banana:

you know what? if you speak more friendly, I will highly appreciate that. :toast:

Sorry OPB but , it's just a constatation , look at the jason/winnie score 100% aircooled and winchester , and look at yours , and you 'll understand i was right. :stick:
It's not a question of cooling , just frequency/Cpupower/Optimisation comparaison.
Sorry if i offenced you. :toast:
02-12-2005, 08:53 AM
mikead_99

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geforce4ti4200

here is what a stock fx55 and stock x800xt PE should get:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8266139

from Macci none the less. 32.2k if your getting below 32k then somethings wrong and/or you are missing alot of tweaks.

We are missing tweaks...and running XP. This is just for the sake of comparison right now. :toast:
02-12-2005, 11:39 AM
Geforce4ti4200

maybe that could be the problem, winxp and no tweaks isnt letting the fx55 shine like it should? If you have time to try this, let us know how it went
02-12-2005, 11:55 AM
misteroadster

For those who have problems with their X850XT , if they can't hit more than 600 Mhz to the ram , by changing my Trp from 5 to 6 by using ATI tool , i can hit 655 now , before it was 587 mhz !!!
I need a bios editor now. :rolleyes:
02-12-2005, 12:03 PM
Geforce4ti4200

you mean it was at 5 and you loosened it to 6 :D did relaxing that timing hurt performance any clock for clock?
02-12-2005, 12:04 PM
misteroadster

before my max nature was 430 , now 480 , i think it's better :)
02-12-2005, 12:05 PM
eva2000

weird why would tightening card ram timings make it go higher ?
02-12-2005, 12:18 PM
Geforce4ti4200

he meant losening it to 6 from a 5
02-12-2005, 12:22 PM
misteroadster

oops thanks geforce , i've done a mistake ;)
02-12-2005, 12:52 PM
mikead_99

Nice tip! I'm testing out the mobo more now, but when I get back to the card I'll give that a go. 620+ was OK with stock volts, 650+ would be great!
02-12-2005, 12:57 PM
eva2000

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

oops thanks geforce , i've done a mistake ;)

lol.. makes more sense loosening to 6
02-12-2005, 01:02 PM
misteroadster

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikead_99

Nice tip! I'm testing out the mobo more now, but when I get back to the card I'll give that a go. 620+ was OK with stock volts, 650+ would be great!

yes , before i had enormous corruption at DL.
Now no problem ;)
02-12-2005, 01:42 PM
misteroadster

really strange :slobber:
I use ver 0.24b1 without problem, try it ;)
your atitool seems to be any japanese version.
02-12-2005, 01:48 PM
k|ngp|n

These cards really rock out of the box eh?.. 650 mem here too...and still no artifacts.
The core hit a wall at 630 with def hsf tho :/
I was expecting more out of the pe core..

MR, that is interesting problem with your card/ mem timings. I didnt experience that.
02-12-2005, 01:50 PM
bachus_anonym

ATITool 0.24 Beta 1

- Added option to control artifact detection sensitivity
- Fixed memory timings editor's MEM_TRFC extra options with garbled characters after the list of correct options
- Added option "Beep on artifact"
- Default profile always in list, even when profiles.ini does not exist
- Fixed crash issue when opening Memory Timings Editor window more than once
- When multiple ATI cards are installed, you can now select the one to use
- Crash issues when returning from standby/hibernate with Catalyst 4.8+ fixed
- Fan control is restored correctly when returning from standby/hibernate
- Completely rewritten Kernel Mode Driver, it's no longer a legacy NT4-style driver
02-12-2005, 01:51 PM
misteroadster

yes 650 no artefact , 655 with a fan.
02-12-2005, 01:55 PM
misteroadster

Quote:

Originally Posted by k|ngp|n

These cards really rock out of the box eh?.. 650 mem here too...and still no artifacts.
The core hit a wall at 630 with def hsf tho :/
I was expecting more out of the pe core..

MR, that is interesting problem with your card/ mem timings. I didnt experience that.

Mine is not a PE.
I was affraid to see 587 Mhz without artefact and 590 was awfull !!!
Probably this card did'nt pass the PE ATI tests with Stock timings.
I'm really happy to see it's not a bull:banana::banana::banana::banana: :)
I prefer this then a poor GPU.
02-12-2005, 02:19 PM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by pc ice

can some one link this beta version.

http://forums.techpowerup.com/showpo...26&postcount=1

you need to register on their forums first, though....
02-12-2005, 02:20 PM
mikead_99

Quote:

Originally Posted by pc ice

can some one link this beta version.

Here Gotta register to d/l. :rolleyes:

edit to add: lol, got me while I was typing b_a.
02-12-2005, 03:15 PM
misteroadster

you can take it here without reg ;)
http://fileforum.betanews.com/downlo...4728381/1?ie=1

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page