600 Lowest Cpu freq.

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-11-2004, 06:50 PM
misteroadster

Quote:

Originally Posted by pkrew

I was using the beta 8.07 drivers. The timings were 2225715. Good luck with win2k

okay , thx Phil , but 8.07 is used for 4.10B and 4.11B; for W2K my image cd dont want to be burned i've killed 3CD already :mad:.
I hope a good 600/600 run from you :toast:
11-11-2004, 08:54 PM
spaceman

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

can you give me the specs required : Cpu, Ram, FSB, Mobo, drivers.....

Doh, sorry guy. CPU is a de-lidded desktop 3200+ (.13), 1M L2 cache, RAM is 1x512 BH-5 @ 1t-2-2-2-5, FSB is 10x250, mobo is DFI LP 250 GB, and Cat 4.9s on Win2k. My RAM was running at 264 stable today, but the chip won't give me decent horsepower. 9x264=2376 MHz., not enough for 30k. Half multis = no boot, or I'd try 9.5. :( I'll put the beta Cats back on tomorrow, and give it another whirl. :) BTW, my VIVO @ XT PE won't do 600/600, on air, so all my entries are for the 520/560 class. :)
11-12-2004, 05:50 AM
misteroadster

i found a winnie/Gskill/XP competitor :D :
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8237697
11-12-2004, 08:02 PM
misteroadster

Quote:

Originally Posted by pkrew

I was using the beta 8.07 drivers. The timings were 2225715. Good luck with win2k

I've installed 2K+DX 8.1 it's better for sure , about 300 pts more.
Very hard to beat you , i'm fighting :toast:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8241057
11-12-2004, 08:13 PM
CodeRed

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

I've installed 2K+DX 8.1 it's better for sure , about 300 pts more.
Very hard to beat you , i'm fighting :toast:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8241057

Try playing with your GPU memory timings ;)

Its amazing how tight you can run with lots of volts and only 560 MHz :D
11-12-2004, 08:23 PM
misteroadster

yes, i tried that yesterday , i think i'm forced to do that now :D
But now it's time to sleep , i'm dead here it's 5:30 AM :rolleyes:
11-12-2004, 08:46 PM
pkrew

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

I've installed 2K+DX 8.1 it's better for sure , about 300 pts more.
Very hard to beat you , i'm fighting :toast:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8241057

You'll get there my friend. :toast:
11-12-2004, 09:47 PM
spaceman

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

I've installed 2K+DX 8.1 it's better for sure , about 300 pts more.
Very hard to beat you , i'm fighting :toast:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8241057

I see ya moved up on your FSB, from 3MHz. to 23 MHz., lol. :D
11-13-2004, 07:05 AM
Frank E. BoNeS

Here's one...Claw@261x9, stock card.....

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8241952

...Might be able to go just a tad lower on the CPU. I'll also try a 600/600 run later.
11-13-2004, 07:41 AM
misteroadster

Quote:

Originally Posted by pkrew

You'll get there my friend. :toast:

Arfff , it's so cruel !!!!!!!!! :D
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8242029
i will retry later !!!! :toast:
11-13-2004, 07:43 AM
misteroadster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank E. BoNeS

Here's one...Claw@261x9, stock card.....

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8241952

...Might be able to go just a tad lower on the CPU. I'll also try a 600/600 run later.

THx , waiting for yours timings and settings ;)
11-13-2004, 07:56 AM
Frank E. BoNeS

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

THx , waiting for yours timings and settings ;)

Timings were 2,2,2,5,7,12...2x256 of BH-5, DX8.1, win2k and the beta 8.07's. Did I miss anything? :D
11-13-2004, 07:58 AM
spaceman

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

Arfff , it's so cruel !!!!!!!!! :D
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8242029
i will retry later !!!! :toast:

LOL, that's harsh. :p: Seems you got the right settings, just need that one magic run. :cool:
11-13-2004, 04:41 PM
misteroadster

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank E. BoNeS

Timings were 2,2,2,5,7,12...2x256 of BH-5, DX8.1, win2k and the beta 8.07's. Did I miss anything? :D

no, it's perfect.
BTW: good job :toast:
11-13-2004, 04:42 PM
Formann

Not quite the result I was hoping for, but here it is.

A64 3500+ NewCastle @ 2570Mhz - 257*10 2-2-2-5 - Stock XT PE.

30013 3dmarks

Still have a lot to learn about tweaking.
11-13-2004, 05:10 PM
misteroadster

Not so bad !! ;) push your ram to 280 Mhz with 9x coeff and some tweaks can do the job :banana:
11-13-2004, 05:44 PM
Formann

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

Not so bad !! ;) push your ram to 280 Mhz with 9x coeff and some tweaks can do the job :banana:

One of the BH5 sticks can do 280, but not the other one. Its clocks about 10Mhz lower. For 267Mhz i need 3.7v (fluctuating from 3.57-3.7) I dont think i can reach 280 even with 3.9vdimm on booster. Im not gonna kill another A64. Im tired of watching my lovedones die.

Still, if i feel up to it, i might give it another try. If I just could find some new and/or better tweaks i could have 30k @ 2500-2530Mhz or so.
11-13-2004, 05:59 PM
misteroadster

i was benching at 3,94vddr for this :
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8243100 :banana:
Héhé :)
11-13-2004, 06:18 PM
Formann

Quote:

Originally Posted by misteroadster

i was benching at 3,94vddr for this :
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8243100 :banana:
Héhé :)

Okay.. you got me convinced. I mean, whats one more dead A64? :D

BUT, first i need to figure out some more tweaks. I dont think 280*9 alone is gonna cut it.
11-13-2004, 06:31 PM
misteroadster

humm, i think 280x9 would be enough with a good LC, but only you can tell us ;)
259X9+2K3=279X8+W2k(400Pts)
2337 =2238+40mhz
2337 =2278
20Mhz FSB = about 60mhz cpu = 600 pts
you are at 2570 and 280x9 give you 2510mhz , really just ok, but probably doable :toast:
11-14-2004, 11:27 AM
misteroadster

waiting for competitorz ...........
11-15-2004, 12:14 AM
spaceman

Mkay, here's an entry for the 600/600 category. (finally volt-modded the vgpu to 1.8v, after mounting a PAL 8150. ;) ) Delidded desktop 3200+ Claw (1mb L2, .13), 1 512MB stick of BH-5 @ 1t-5-2-2-2, CPU @ 9x260= 2340 MHz., Cat 4.11s & DX9c on 2kPro, on DFI 250 GB. Oh yeah, might need this. ;) http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8245514
11-15-2004, 12:41 AM
misteroadster

thanks spaceman ;)
11-15-2004, 11:54 AM
misteroadster

:banana: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8245830
http://pageperso.aol.fr/misteroadster/30K520.JPG

New 600/600 record :
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=8246048 :banana4:

Edit: Tras and Trc wrong on the screen. :D
11-15-2004, 11:58 AM
misteroadster

Quote:

Originally Posted by CodeRed

600/600 is fine by me, but a few are on stock air, no volt mods, and have warranty on their cards ;) 600/600 is probably a bit too high for these "stock" cards. 520/560 is also another nice number to choose, everyone should be able to do that :cool:

EDIT: If 520/560 forces u to use the 9x multi then that gives me a fighting chance :p:

you were wrong dude , 520/560 is a great contest , really hard , 600/600 is easier in fact :p:

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page