How has he got a 21 multi? es chip?
Printable View
How has he got a 21 multi? es chip?
133x21=2800
No ES, the 2.4a and the 2.8a only have 133FSB
Holy **** that is fast. That is one insane clock speed (those japanese guys really are insane)
Wonder how many chips he went through (must flood selling forums with them :p:)
And i thought this place was xtreme LOL :p:Quote:
some people have dipped fingers into the nitrogen and pulled them out quickly without harm (DO NOT ATTEMPT)
G
Funny thing is his score scales ~= with people running EE's I've seen. So it looks that EE's have little or no advantage over A's in superpi... which is a little wierd.
Prescott scales better with clockspeed than northwood and gallatin, at slower speeds below 4ghz or so Id say gallatin is the fastest but once you get up to those extreme clocks around 5ghz or so Prescott starts to get faster.Quote:
Originally posted by Lithan
Funny thing is his score scales ~= with people running EE's I've seen. So it looks that EE's have little or no advantage over A's in superpi... which is a little wierd.
Why would that happen? I was under the impression that Gallatin did more work per clock cycle, so it should scale better than prescotts.
according to anandtech as seen here
http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/...t/image002.gif
the L2 cache on prescotts wont reach the same speeds at Northwoods until it hits 5ghz. because the prescott ram runs at higher latencies.
also the longer pipeline makes the processor less efficient because if there is an error it has to take longer to fix it than if the pipeline were shorter, but if this longer pipeline allow higher clockspeeds which it does, at some point those increase in clockspeeds would make up for the lowered efficency, and i believe this nuber is somewhere aroun 4ghz for prescotts, give or take 200mhz
look here http://anandtech.com/cpu/showdoc.html?i=1956&p=24
Yes but my point is this. Mathematically calculating the results an EE would get at 5.6ghz, they would be ~= to what this A got. Which indicates that Superpi shows little difference between the two types of cpus.
hmm, that could be true, what did u use to calculate it
I took 2 examples of high clocked ee's at 1:1 250+FSB on BH5. Then I took lower clocked examples at ~the same fsb/ram settings. calculated the ~ impact regarding %clockspeed increase against %time taken for result decrease. To figure what a 25% clockspeed increase in a 4.4ghz clocked EE would give (5.5ghz). My results gave me 23sec.
The LN2 Container alone cost 600 dollars ( approx 3700 dkr), for the SMALLEST container ( 10 litres) the biggest, almost 1000 dollars..Quote:
Originally posted by bh2k
Ln2 doesn't cost 600 dollars where are you getting that number from?
Prices in DK..
I still wonder how he is able to push 1.71v through his Asus p4c800 when Prescotts stop working at 1.6v
did someone find a way around?
VCore-Mod? Only the bios is limiting the vcore to 1.6v, I'm right?
That holds true for Super Pi, but I think 3DMark2001 would still be dominated by the EE.Quote:
Originally posted by Lithan
I took 2 examples of high clocked ee's at 1:1 250+FSB on BH5. Then I took lower clocked examples at ~the same fsb/ram settings. calculated the ~ impact regarding %clockspeed increase against %time taken for result decrease. To figure what a 25% clockspeed increase in a 4.4ghz clocked EE would give (5.5ghz). My results gave me 23sec.
And you know this cos..?Quote:
Macci: This is what i meant... LN2 is only about -100 <-> -120C
LN2 can get the base temp to -100..-190C. It all depends on how you use it. And this piece of info comes from personal experience :)
Just from reading here... But since it evaporates and doesnt cool as well i figured that around -100C... Like dragsters...Quote:
Originally posted by macci
And you know this cos..?
LN2 can get the base temp to -100..-190C. It all depends on how you use it. And this piece of info comes from personal experience :)
But isnt a very good cascade then almost as good if not better(Constant -temp and not swinging like LN2??)
Like Macci said, the LN2 BASE CAN be COLD...like -170C or so... it just depends on what number you're SHOOTING for. Add too much LN2 and it might hit -190C and the rig may BSOD....
C
Did'nt find this on xtreme so i thought i would post it for you.
http://www.hkepc.com/bbs/viewthread....hlight=&page=1
Insane...
Yep, posted.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...threadid=37007
Thanks link to the thread
Really sorry to bother then :)
not a problem.
Charlie - what do you mean?Quote:
Originally posted by charlie
Like Macci said, the LN2 BASE CAN be COLD...like -170C or so... it just depends on what number you're SHOOTING for. Add too much LN2 and it might hit -190C and the rig may BSOD....
C
The rig go like boom?
Is it like the "magical" -120C cpu stop?
Quote:
Originally posted by JacobHansen
The LN2 Container alone cost 600 dollars ( approx 3700 dkr), for the SMALLEST container ( 10 litres) the biggest, almost 1000 dollars..
Prices in DK..
thats not true.. you could easily aquire some cheaper than that... as said with LN2 you got to know the right people.. :)
Bias_hjort.
That was the prices i was by Yara.. ( company that sell Liquid Nitrogen )
I know - But I Don´t know the right people regarding LN2..
Do you? - and if you do, can you get me some?
next time PM me about something like that :).. But currently I dont know whether I still can get it. Maybe or maybe not ;) :)