Nvidia reveals the 64-bit Denver core... with a fake die shot

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by davidzo

sure its a representation. just like the woodscrews card was a representation.

but for what?
Its definitely not a representation for an Architecture. Taht would be much better shown with Diagrammes and even the Layout would be shown with blocks like in the bobcat sheets.

Its a representation for an actual chip, not for an Architecture. Its meant to give the impression they finished the Designstage already and are working on actual silicon. Thats what they suggest. Its not what they write, but they dont deny it either.

---

If you imply something from that, no company is liable for what you imply when it comes to the SEC. Its really that simple. They have to come out and state something in order for them to be held liable.

Also, it looks like Charlie's article decides to not credit the original source but rather this thread which does credit the original source. :rolleyes:

I don’t care about the GF100 background picture but im certainly interesting if the module outline (White lines) is correctly representing the “Denver” CPU architecture.