here's a screenshot:
280FSB, 1:1, 3-4-4-8
Printable View
here's a screenshot:
280FSB, 1:1, 3-4-4-8
Nice bandwidth there mate:toast:
I'm getting a stable max of about 288mhz out of the XMS4400 at 2.8v CAS 2.5 7,4,4 on a P4C800/P4C2.4ghz. I'm gonna raise the timings and go for more....
my setup wont boot at cas 2.5 :(Quote:
Originally posted by mdzcpa
Nice bandwidth there mate:toast:
I'm getting a stable max of about 288mhz out of the XMS4400 at 2.8v CAS 2.5 7,4,4 on a P4C800/P4C2.4ghz. I'm gonna raise the timings and go for more....
how much bandwidth you getting?
Which memory are you using and which timmings?? How much vdd and which cooling for the chipset?? Bios D10 I guess no??Quote:
Originally posted by Hëll ‡ Fîrë
Cough...back to the NF7 thingy quickly...
I just recieved one, booted at 235 outta box, and just did mod and she booted at 247.
Thats with no burn in on board and ram as both are new.
This isnt my board, modded for a friend, so I leave it to him to post how it runs for him after he gets it from me.
Err, also, saying that using a vmodded board to get higher clocks versus someone going stock is one valid arguement, but saying that someone using a modded bios isnt running stock isnt 100% accurate. Changing bios to find something stable and something that allows full use of the board is by no means "cheating" our way to high clocks. Not our fault if someone doenst bother running a board through its paces to see what works best. I say more power to anyone that runs a modded board or bios if it helps. Espec the bios since its not the publics fault that it takes 112 bios releases from a company to get all the bugs worked out.
Thanks (I´m going to start playing with another NF7 ;) )