When buying high end hardware I want the best image quality,and should not have to adjust settings for a better picture.These cards are not fast enough to deliver a good experience without sacrificing image quality.:shakes:
Printable View
When buying high end hardware I want the best image quality,and should not have to adjust settings for a better picture.These cards are not fast enough to deliver a good experience without sacrificing image quality.:shakes:
Cat AI sliders exist till what 3 - 4+ years now ( and before the system was different )Quote:
Originally Posted by Carfax
for use the specific high optimisation you need to set Cat AI to "Advanced", i don't know any one who use it, all use the Cat AI on " Standard " or completely disabled...
All reviews and ATI user disable it or use it on " standard " ....
AFAIK most reviewers just use default IQ settings in their reviews.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitriman
Not a hardware problem, it is a driver problem.
Ultimately, something that can be fixed quickly but at virtually no gain to the gamer.
Whats is what ppl are paying forQuote:
Originally Posted by Hell Hound
Whole net says there is somthing wrong.
When ppl expect hi end and get :shrug:
IQ is only subjective if you look at it with out any methodology. aliasing and artifacts can be quantified fairly well. what looks "good" is definitely a different story though. for example, one of the reasons crysis looks good is because it is in a lush tropical island which has more appeal than a desert.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rai
oh and crysis is a poor game to judge IQ with. nv and ati optimize drivers for big titles like crysis frequently. that's why an 8000 series card could have inferior image quality in crysis but still be superior in other games.
if there is only one way to render something, we wont have any innovation in optimization.
if edge detect AA looks 95% as good but with half the impact as box AA, would you use it or despise it?
each person has their own answer to that, and should be happy if they are given the options for both.
You must have Cat AI enabled when using crossfire. In SLI, you can disable all the optimizations if you want.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanek
Texture banding isn't opinion or subjective, sorry.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rai
Cat AI just has to be on, it can either be set to standard or advanced, as long as its on.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElSel10
Well, no matter what the cause is, it is still a problem. And until it's fixed it's there to annoy users. 5870 has been around for ages and virtually nothing's been done about the issue AFAIK. So hope AMD sorts this out by Cayman release. Read: ASAP.Quote:
Originally Posted by nn_step
Maybe I'm too busy actually playing the games to try and spot small details, as stated before the Nvidia's optimizations for Crysis made the game look terrible, that's not subjective either.Quote:
Originally Posted by ElSel10
The issue has been popping up in varying degrees for the last 13 months...or 13 driver revisions in AMD's book. If it gets fixed now, it will be a bloody miracle.Quote:
Originally Posted by zalbard
Thread title suggests AMD lied about a hardware improvement and that it is not present even if AMD claimed so. Very misleading and innacurate geared to purposively generate anti climax with the new releases. Mods should interfere with thread title. If its not 100% accurate its not news, its fud.
Honestly how much of a problem is this? I've seen the videos and it's pretty bad but how common is this texture banding? It's not like there are tons of threads about people dumping their ATI card due to these AF issues.
I have a 6870 on the way so I guess that I'll find out soon enough.
I remember a lot of people here in the news section arguing that too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chumbucket843
One of the main reasons that I sold my 4870x2 was it's performance in older, modded, and less popular games. Morrowind really sticks out. I play Darkplaces pretty regularly which happens to be another game where the x2 didn't perform as well as my 280.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle
Thats actually one thing that I can't stand about video card reviews. Every site uses the same handful of new games most of which aren't even very good which means they won't be getting played much if at all. It would be nice to see some sites use say a modded Morrowind or even Oblivion install in their reviews. Maybe Stalker SOC complete, Eduke32, or Darkplaces. Even Serious Sam HD hammers my GTX280 but I've never seen it used in a review. Everyone just uses the same handful of top games that you know da** well both companies drivers are optimized for.
What do I care how Metro runs? I'll never play that again. AvP? I won't even consider buying that pos. BFBC2? How many UE3 games do you need reviewed?
Actually, no.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dimitriman
AMD claimed better AF quality. Meanwhile, they are still using FP16 render target demotion which can decrease the overall IQ in scenes but increase performance.
Standard don't include the optimisations incriminate, it's just apply the "standard profile", exactly same Nvidia driver do ... it's needed for allow the ATI cards to use the specific crossfire profile / games, as typer of renderer ( AFR etc ).. Nothing more .. for enable the "Incriminate" optimisation you need set the Cat AI slider on " advanced " ...Quote:
Originally Posted by ElSel10
Really good point re which games to test. That's why I put the most stock into Techpowerup's reviews. They test a really vast array of games, quite of few of them are older too. I don't see the point in testing a half dozen newer games, most of which are garbage.Quote:
Originally Posted by BababooeyHTJ
dont forget FarCry2Quote:
Originally Posted by BababooeyHTJ
played that for a few dozen hours then never looked at it again. great graphics, and smooth playing, but no where near what i would call an awesome game.
Hum im maybe wrong. but is FP16 demition is not the surface optimisation setting you can disable or enable by just check it or uncheck it under the Cat AI setting ?Quote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
I quote an article about this setting:
The Surface Format Optimization checkbox allows improved performance in selected games that use 16-bit floating point surfaces for HDR rendering. It is designed to have no discernable effect on image quality,.
Sounds like a reviewer quoting from the supplied AMD PR materials to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanek
From my experience, the check box has no effect on the way AMD's drivers handle FP16 at this point. I'll check again when the 10.11 drivers are released but 10.10 WHQL and 10.10c don't show any difference when it is toggled.
I've got bits and pieces of testing done for an IQ article and FP16 is one of the first things I tested for when 10.10 came out.
We differ in opinion than. While you have a problem with reviewers using current games as a bases for a review I do not. Perhaps you should email them asking them to use older games. Furthermore, as already pointed out drivers may not longer be fully optimized to run those older games like they use to. As for reviewers using a handful of current games to review, that's been common practice for sometime now.Quote:
Originally Posted by BababooeyHTJ
However, lets put the gist your post to practice shall we? Computer Base used those older games to do IQ comparisons yet used current games to do the actual benchmark reviews. So the question is why did they do that? Obviously they had current games on hand to show IQ comparisons along with the rest of the review. So again, how can I make any distinction between HL2 IQ vs Dirt 2 benchmark review? The answer is simple, I cannot. So in the end, the IQ part of the review loses merit as it's a complete disconnect to the benchmark review.
That is a good point. Especially considering that some of the games mentioned had known problems with AMD (at the time ATI) drivers and AF implementation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle
There is one thing to remember: NVIDIA called out AMD about FP16 demotion several months ago and specifically mentioned the following games:
Empire Total War
Far Cry
Dawn of War 2
Need for Speed: Shift
Oblivion
Serious Sam 2
There may have been others as well but I can't remember them off the top of my head.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
Nice point, i have not really test further with this settings, as im not even sure CCC modded with this settings is working 100% correctly with 5870 right now ..... (same goes for MLAA)
One reason for using older games might have been, that the problem is more apparent. It also shows, that either these "optimizations" are more general in nature, but don't work well with some games or they are game specific and if they miss something or the game you want to play is not exactly an AAA title, you might be out of luck.
Testing every game you benchmark with every driver version and comparing it not only with competition, but with older generation of cards would be quite exhausting in either of these cases and it still might not be enough.
Why should drivers need to be "optimized" for older games? Yes Nvidia has had issues recently with older games. Gothic and NWN2 comes to mind both of which have been fixed. I want to be able to play an older game or a source port (some of which can be very demanding) and have it looking as it should.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eastcoasthandle
Why would a benchmark on a game like HL2 matter? We all know that it runs at a more than acceptable framerate. I applaud Computerbase for pointing these issues out. The point stands no matter how much you try and downplay it. Benchmarks only tell half of the story.
There is no excuse for sub-par image quality on a $200-$700 product. When I spend that much on a video card I want it to be able to run anything that I throw at it. Not only games made in the last three years.:rolleyes:
That said I have yet to see a post about one person switching to a Nvidia card because of AF issues so it can't be that common of a problem.
I agree with that but if you want more hits and you want your review to stand out why not try something different? I clicked on quite a few links from OTH in the 6870/50 review thread and most of the reviews tested the same da** games. If I wasn't interested in picking up a 6870 I wouldn't have done that and probably only checked a couple of sites. There are quite a few pretty popular sites whos reviews I don't even bother to check anymore since it's the same crap done elsewhere. Use one surprise game every once in a while.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vardant