ratGPU OpenCL raytracing benchmark

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

11-10-2010, 10:14 AM
NapalmV5

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arctucas

950/2200

950/2200
http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/6556/31319747.png
11-10-2010, 10:17 AM
NapalmV5

stock cooler :up:
http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/2269/60116421.png
11-10-2010, 01:42 PM
Arctucas

950/2200 with my new (i7 950) rig:

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...PU950-2200.jpg

By the way, how much did that 580 cost you, if you do not mind me asking?
11-10-2010, 04:46 PM
jogshy

Nice 580, Napalm! :shocked:

Btw, I've just uploaded the 0.4.5 for MacOSX 10.6.

http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/210...u045macosx.jpg

It's my first program for Mac :D
In the next days I'll upload the 0.4.5 for all the other OSs... I've just optimized sightly the performance and solved several minor bugs tho.
11-10-2010, 07:08 PM
blindbox

Where are the AMD benches anyway?
11-10-2010, 07:29 PM
jogshy

Quote:

Originally Posted by blindbox

Where are the AMD benches anyway?

Cat 10.10 APP broke ratGPU, so I bet no 6XXX fun unless AMD solves their JIT-compiler infinite loops in the upcoming Stream SDK 2.3 :(
11-10-2010, 09:29 PM
Particle

http://www.pcrpg.org/pics/misc/ratGPU.png
11-10-2010, 11:23 PM
NapalmV5

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arctucas

950/2200 with my new (i7 950) rig:

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...PU950-2200.jpg

By the way, how much did that 580 cost you, if you do not mind me asking?

even if it costs more it still beats 2x 460 :D

my results here have all been on the q9650/p45/ddr2

an upgrade has long been overdue but its coming

arctucas keep pushing :up:

Quote:

Originally Posted by jogshy

Nice 580, Napalm! :shocked:

Btw, I've just uploaded the 0.4.5 for MacOSX 10.6.

http://img51.imageshack.us/img51/210...u045macosx.jpg

It's my first program for Mac :D
In the next days I'll upload the 0.4.5 for all the other OSs... I've just optimized sightly the performance and solved several minor bugs tho.

thanx jogshy :toast: stock cooled at that

0.4.5 bring it!
11-11-2010, 12:35 AM
blindbox

Quote:

Originally Posted by jogshy

Cat 10.10 APP broke ratGPU, so I bet no 6XXX fun unless AMD solves their JIT-compiler infinite loops in the upcoming Stream SDK 2.3 :(

Bleh, that explains.

EDIT: Now we just need another Intel run, since this one is from an old version :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by tet5uo

Here's a CPU only run on my 980x @ 4.45 w/ 12gb of ddr3 2000mHz cas10

http://i1201.photobucket.com/albums/...5uo/ratCPU.jpg
11-15-2010, 01:04 PM
Manicdan

i decided to check this out over the weekend, great benchmark.
got 607 seconds with the cpu in my sig, somehow a 100mhz slower than particle, but 13 seconds faster.

loved playing with the various settings and i noticed the slider for quality, seemed to do nothing visually, but alot on the scene setup time (like it makes more polygons? but we cant see them very well with the AA at 0x?)
11-15-2010, 02:18 PM
NapalmV5

stock cooling :up: virgins no mods :up:
http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/6033/43178276.png
11-15-2010, 03:46 PM
Expat GriZ

1 Attachment(s)

Hmmmmmm....does this look right??????
11-15-2010, 03:50 PM
Expat GriZ

edit: Wow NapalmV5!! The 580 is kickin it!! :up: :up:
11-16-2010, 06:55 PM
jogshy

I've just uploaded the 0.4.5d fixing several bugs with the timers for Windows, Ubuntu 10, SUSE 11.3 and MacOSX 10.6. Fedora 14 still has some problems with OpenCL :mad:

Btw, I've tested it with the new Intel OpenCL 1.1 SDK Alpha ( which appeared today ):

http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/8...lopenclsdk.jpg

Here are the results with my i7 920 OCd to 4Ghz ( I have no idea why it says 2666Ghz on the description tho ) and Win7 x64 ( with ratGPU in 32bits mode.. because the IntelSDK currently only supports x86 ).
http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/1...ntelopencl.jpg

Gonna be interesting to compare the AMD's CPU implementation vs the Intel's one ;)
11-16-2010, 11:35 PM
NapalmV5

Quote:

Originally Posted by Expat GriZ

edit: Wow NapalmV5!! The 580 is kickin it!! :up: :up:

thanx :toast: indeed!

0.4.5d
http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/901/54014696.png
11-17-2010, 08:42 AM
Manicdan

anyway to add individual times for each portion of the test? if its going to take a few hours it might not be worth the effort,
but it think you would want to have each test be "about" the same effort. so adjust the accuracy of the rays or resolution size, etc.
this could really help make your app show if certain devices work best on certain things, and i think it would then have enough quality for some serious reviewers to use it in testing
11-17-2010, 10:37 AM
jogshy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manicdan

anyway to add individual times for each portion of the test?

You can open each scene file individually and render changing the settings if you need.
File->Open -> locate the .RAT files which are on [installpath]\StandAloneRenderer\scenes -> Change the common settings ( adjust resolution, etc... ) -> Change # of rays, etc... -> Render
11-17-2010, 12:24 PM
Manicdan

Quote:

Originally Posted by jogshy

You can open each scene file individually and render changing the settings if you need.
File->Open -> locate the .RAT files which are on [installpath]\StandAloneRenderer\scenes -> Change the common settings ( adjust resolution, etc... ) -> Change # of rays, etc... -> Render

been playing with that.
just thought it would be cool to have the benchmark do all of it for us.
11-17-2010, 04:44 PM
STEvil

how about changing the hybrid render path so one (or all similar) renderers go from one side of the image and the rest (slower) ones go from the other until they meet at whatever point they run into each other? This would reduce the workload being cut into two equal halves then being placed on two unequal performing parts.
11-17-2010, 06:14 PM
jogshy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Manicdan

just thought it would be cool to have the benchmark do all of it for us.

Yep, I should add some option to do that in future versions. Thanks!

Quote:

Originally Posted by STEvil

how about changing the hybrid render path so one (or all similar) renderers go from one side of the image and the rest (slower) ones go from the other until they meet at whatever point they run into each other?

Yep, I need to investigate it a bit. Thanks!
11-18-2010, 05:34 AM
fellix_bg

This is with Intel's first public OpenCL 1.1 alpha driver:

http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/2713/ratgpu.png
http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/9445/gpucaps.png
11-18-2010, 01:26 PM
Arctucas

With version 4.5e, 950/2200:

http://i291.photobucket.com/albums/l...0011-18-10.jpg
11-25-2010, 01:51 PM
AmdAtiTom420

Thanks jogshy ! I'm about to try it with the 10.11 set.

http://sites.amd.com/us/game/downloa...n_win7-64.aspx

EDIT
10.11 DIED ! LOL but 10.9 worked fine..
http://img.techpowerup.org/101125/RatGPU.jpg

The Gpu was enabled by mistake on this run.
http://img.techpowerup.org/101125/RatGPU Cpu1.jpg

Cpu C++
http://img.techpowerup.org/101125/ratGPU c++.jpg

Gpu oc'd to 770 core.
http://img.techpowerup.org/101125/RatGPU 770CORE.jpg
11-25-2010, 07:16 PM
andressergio

here's mine :up:

http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/7829/ratgpu.jpg

cheers :toast:

Sergio
11-25-2010, 07:55 PM
AmdAtiTom420

Some quick math tells me, the low shader speeds maybe holding the Ati cards back.

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page