Didn't it take just a few months for ATI to respond with the HD2400? which was up to par with Nvidia's G80???
**EDIT** and when I say up to par I don't mean equal, but very close to.
Printable View
Didn't it take just a few months for ATI to respond with the HD2400? which was up to par with Nvidia's G80???
**EDIT** and when I say up to par I don't mean equal, but very close to.
fail postQuote:
Originally Posted by kuroikenshi
the HD2400 was a lowend card that was put in millions of dells in school and home computers.
you are prolly thinking of the 2900XT which really was nowere close
lol yeah fail post, that what you when when one posts straight after getting up from bed, will have to get a coffee first before I type any further
Especially after the edit didn't even correct the fail…Quote:
Originally Posted by stangracin3
I LOL at myself!!!!!!:rofl::rofl::rofl:
damn that was the failsauce of the day
The 8800GTX lasted nearly 2 years.
It's close to a 4850 in performance.
Correct, G 80 will always be fondly remembered as one of the greatest GPU chip ever made, alongside R300 & its derivative R350 (if you consider R300 & R350 as the same chip with only minor improvement perhaps this is the chip that can challenge G 80 performance leading longevity in history).
Stop with your terrible logic. We compare dual slot, single PCIE cards to dual slot, single PCIE cards.Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew LB
I really am confused by this post.Quote:
Originally Posted by cegras
What are you trying to say, because I remember a 1950xt being a dual slot card.
Its a bit confusing the point your trying to make.
It really was kind of a weird comparison(at least if they are the only two setup in the comparison) to compare a single card to two cards combined.
Simple, one guy defines dominance as a single gpu card pwning a dual gpu setup/card. Another guy defines dominance by being on top as long as it uses 1 pci-e slot.Quote:
Originally Posted by tajoh111
Tbh, I don't really get what Andrew_LB is replying to anyway. kuroikenshi merely said 5970 is in a league of its own.
:shrug::shrug:
EDIT: Personally, I'll just shut my mouth. No point getting bothered with this :D. It's just messing with my mind.
i guess you didn't back then... :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by cegras
so, in summary, there is no hd6000 delay and the g80 kicked ass for a long time.
/thread
He's echoing the mantra of nvidia fans who love to say the 5970 cannot be compared to single GPU cards even though you can purchase it and stick it into your PCIE slot.Quote:
Originally Posted by tajoh111
Back then the 8800GTX / Ultra was the best card to get, period.Quote:
Originally Posted by 570091D
Thanks! Saved me few minutes of reading :DQuote:
Originally Posted by 570091D
Looks like 2011 will be another year with complete AMD dominance.
if only AMD could get a good driver team together and start releasing GOOD drivers..I might switch next upgrade
Looks like DigTimes changed their mind:
Quote:
no issues with amd in the last 2 years; i never understood why people complain that much about amd drivers...Quote:
Originally Posted by DragoonXX
well i guess that this is related to the fact that 60-70% of the people claiming that amd drivers suck own and nvidia card :shakes:
Half of it is fanboy nonsense, the rest is mostly Crossfire/HTPC specific. Individual game issues seem to get knocked out pretty quick. Not perfect, but neither are Nvidia drivers.Quote:
Originally Posted by generics_user
most drivers errors are really human errors ...Quote:
Originally Posted by generics_user
Maybe the rest of the world isn't as uber ati perfect as you, just because it isn't raining where you live doesn't mean its not rainy anywhere else in the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by generics_user
Tunnel vision is bliss... :up:
ive had issues with the installer not working so well, or xfire perf not being that awesome. but overall its no worse than nvidia issue we have with the laptops here.
mountains out of mole hills
I still want a confirmation on all of this "68xx series is the new midrange" crap.
You'd have a point if he was making claims about Ati being 100% perfect and all reports of problems were dirty lies, but that isn't what he said. The people who spam "OMG Ati drivers suck LOL" in every thread is who he was referring to.Quote:
Originally Posted by highoctane
lets see...finicky config for multi-monitor/resolution and driver settings that don't like to stay are two of the main "fun times" I had when setting up a multi monitor config at my church. two cards (non crossfire) driving two monitors, 1 projector and two floor TVs.Quote:
Originally Posted by generics_user
Setup is One monitor is dedicated, second monitor displays same as TVs and projector, TVs connected using svid- I'd love to be able to run the TVs at 1024*768 *max they support* and the projector and second monitor at 1280*1024, but I can't
lower performance in folding applications (may have changed, havn't really looked since when I was looking for my GTX 260)
and lets also not forget driver optimizations for games/TWIMTBP program-random crashes in games with new drivers; etc
let me also be clear- I have issues with nvidia drivers too, but for the uses I have...nvidia has been a better option for me
The point is clearly in the quote...Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMojoZ
His two years of having "no issues with amd" sounds like they have some pretty perfect drivers to me and is implying that maybe the rest of the world isn't as adept as he since they are complaining about their problems.Quote:
Originally Posted by generics_user View Post
no issues with amd in the last 2 years; i never understood why people complain that much about amd drivers...
Throw out the change logs guys, everything has been great for two years, there are no driver bugs to fix...