AMD press release said Radeon HD 3000 or superior with DX10.1 or DX11 support on Windows 7 for Direct2D.Quote:
Originally Posted by informal
My old Intel GMA with DX9 only support doesn't run with Direct2D hardware acceleration... 22 points (CPU only).
We don't know.The other users' i3 with intel GMA has higher scores than my Radeon 4850 with QC Agena @ 2.6Ghz,which is fishy to say the least. He didn't run any other test(amazon or new CoH) so we can't say what's going on.Quote:
Originally Posted by savantu
I will try and find what is MS saying on the IE9 requirements for hw accel.Quote:
Originally Posted by ethomaz
edit: can't find anything regarding hw requirements on MS website :S.
Is there anyone with i3 or i5 with builtin GPU who can try and run these tests?Also,someone with the Radeon 4xxx or 5xxx could run and post their results.
I tried it on this Pentium work machine and only got 11...when I get home, if you still need it, I'll try it with a 5850.Quote:
Originally Posted by informal
Ok thanks ryboto,it would be nice to see what kind of numbers 5850 pulls in these tests(try the psycho test and amazon book reading test).
... "never gonna give you up"
Where can i get the HTML5 benchmark?
Edit: Figured it out...
~1280x680:
http://richierich1212.smugmug.com/ph...1_RxwdT-X2.jpg
About the same result.
dumb question
its not OpenCL related is it?
No. Direct2D only.Quote:
Originally Posted by Manicdan
So Core i3 IGP is better than Radeon HD 5000 over Direct2D???
Ran it with chrome and got 119.
Also Amazon benchmark:
Chrome has no Direct2D hardware acceleration... just IE9 and Firefox 4.0 bet has support.
kl0012, can you try hallucinogenic mode?
Already did it. See previous page.Quote:
Originally Posted by richierich
nm I see it nowQuote:
Originally Posted by kl0012
The benchmark has quite a jitter, my HD5870 ranges between 1800-1900 in normal mode and 600-660 hallu mode. (on vista 64 with an install that is 2 years old.. :D)
I hate raining on everyone's parade, but that isn't the standard City of Heroes. That looks like City of Heroes: Going Rogue which is a game AMD has HIGHLY optimized code for and one that Intel's current GPU drivers don't even properly support.
Perhaps the i3's IGP exceeds the 2D capability of the 5000 series? 2D performance is kind of static among all members except Matrox after all, and it wouldn't be terribly shocking.
Overall GPU load never exceeded 22% and CPU never exceeded more than a few percent during these runs. That i3 is faster at Direct2D I guess. I ran it at a resolution within a few pixels of the i3's run.
http://pcrpg.org/pics/misc/IE9-T1.png
http://pcrpg.org/pics/misc/IE9-T2.png
he is using ie9...i dont think amd used ie?
yes they are.. there are only 2 browsers that support D2D. IE and Firefox, with Firefox only released its D2D capable beta 6 days ago.Quote:
Originally Posted by god_43
Plus, look at the screens -> IE logo. :p:
They did use IE9. I'm willing to postulate that it's possible the big and small score were Zacate's scores on both modes of this benchmark, not a comparison between i3 and Zacate. That would be such an interpretation fail by Anand if so.
Dell 11z with SU4100 1.3GHz + Intel GMA 4500MHD:
http://richierich1212.smugmug.com/ph...2_MuHVq-X2.jpg
Eh I think it's a resolution limitation or something.
That's what I believe.Quote:
Originally Posted by Particle
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw14MgRHYJE
That shows the demo running on both right at the end.
Clearly so, jimbo. The laptop must have not had the power saving GPU setting set to performance as someone else speculated.