Originally Posted by
flamenko
Again, I agree totally which is why I now make sure that performance testing software (ie vantage) is used in reviews. Its actually a two sided coin where it is not fair to base an end opinion on a simple Crystal 0Fill score because it is not indicative of the true performance yet, its not right to exclude this method because comparing a compressed/non-compressed ssd in ...oh lets say ATTO... is also not a true representation because the non-compressed (Intel) looks so much better when it actually is not the case. For example, if I put the OWC beside the Intel in AS SSD tests, the Intel cleans house. People would wonder why anyone would buy the OWC. Now, if we go and put these through the wash in PCMark Vantage x64, It shows a totally different picture. Actually, the true picture shown in simulated true to life testing is closest resembled through an ATTO test of both drives.
Its really a damned if you do and damned if you don't story. At the end of the day though, we still have countless number of people wondering why there SandForce SSDs are getting such poor AS SSD and Crystal scores... Oh and thanks for the article....I eat thats stuff up.