if it mattered enough to change the name, they would :)
Printable View
if it mattered enough to change the name, they would :)
Comparing Textures Filtrate/Pixel Filtrate and Memory bandwidh, the 256 bytes/1024mb version is better than GTX 465....?
So GTX 460 better than GTX 465 and 50$ cheaper, probably more overclocking headroom due the less complicated and smaller chip., less heat and power consumption.
The 768mb model at 200$ wiil be a little under GTX 465 but 70-80$ cheaper.
Let say that GTX 460 seems to be the first Fermi done right for us and for Nvidia(lower costs, probably higher yelds so more profit)>
Looks like newegg leaked some info early:)
http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product...tx+460&x=0&y=0
EVGA 768-P3-1360-TR GeForce GTX 460 (Fermi) 768MB 192-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card
Chipset Manufacturer: NVIDIA
Core Clock: 675MHz
Shader Clock: 1350MHz
Stream Processors: 336 Processor Cores
Model #: 768-P3-1360-TR
Item #: N82E16814130562
Palit NE5X460SF1102 GeForce GTX 460 (Fermi) Sonic 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card
Chipset Manufacturer: NVIDIA
Core Clock: 725MHz
Shader Clock: 1450MHz
Stream Processors: 336 Processor Cores
Model #: NE5X460SF1102
Item #: N82E16814261075
Return Policy: VGA Standard Return Policy
Some leaks ...
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/cd2ea06...0047eedf8c.jpg
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/bccb826...cdc4701b3d.jpg
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/75d5986...260fcfa369.jpg
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/c75bbdb...77892444fd.jpg
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/6259f9c...fe26d7b4db.jpg
http://tof.canardpc.com/view/278e65e...3578bc2916.jpg
those numbers put it very close to a 5850 it seems
I like to see the GTX 460 1GB too.
i can see there are performance (1), (3), and (5) but 2 and 4 are missing :D any dx11 leaks ?
http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/2...xxxxx66813.jpg
yeah i found performance 2.. now we need 4
What are you smoking? :eek:Quote:
Originally Posted by Manicdan
It barely beats a 5830...
whats wrong with unigine scores why so low ?
I hate to admit it, but maybe Charlie was right all along with the "tesselation" performance will go down the toilet with derivatives..Quote:
Originally Posted by kaktus1907
IMO all about the RAM.. 1080p, 8xAA and tessellation level unknown.. someone can show us how much unigine eat RAM at same settings..
looking at TPU 465 review i see:Quote:
Originally Posted by Picao84
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/Zotac/GeFo...rfrel_1920.gif
a 5850 is 12% slower than a 465, which is 17% slower than 5850
and a 460 seems to be a good 5% faster than a 465, which would then make the gap
5830 17% slower
5850 12% faster
and thats the 768MB version. i hope the 1GB card is going to get a good 5-10% more and maybe this will bring ATI cards down 30% in price
Look again at those graphs. The GTX460 768MB is NOT beating a GTX465...Quote:
Originally Posted by Manicdan
Sorry to burst your wet dream, but its not gonna happen..
About the GTX460 1GB.. lets wait and see..
my apologies, damn horrible nvidia numbering system. and its not my wet dream, its everyones. the only people happy with an ATI card are the ones who bought them 9 months ago for a few dollars cheaperQuote:
Originally Posted by Picao84
Hope 1 GB/256-bit will do the job ... 768 MB/192-bit seems to be the limit with some 1920X1080 AAX8 scores :shrug:
True. Its not my wet dream because I dont buy graphics cards or play much :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Manicdan
I just like to watch the usual skirmish :p:
Well thats my hope also, as an nVIDIA fan :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by Olivon
But somehow I dont believe it.. Heard some rumours that GF104 is closer to GT200 than GF100 ..
so full gf104 aka gtx475 will be flop then ? without high tesssellation power it would be nothing..Quote:
Originally Posted by Picao84
i dont trust those numbers, unigine wise
Looks promising. Finally Nvidia has a power efficient card out. Only problem is that 5850 uses the same (even less according to Anandtech) than 5830.Quote:
Originally Posted by cold2010
Seems like the GTX460 finally will give AMD some incitament to drop the prices a bit.
It looks like a HD 5830 killer, possibly even HD 5850 depending how good it overclocks.
so it's going to be someting like this ? (my pic)
7 SM
48sp & 8TMU per SM.
wow great effort IDANPE :toast:
but there should be 32 rops and no L2 Cache..