@Pi: interesting to read, I'm not the only stupid guy arround, who can't even run 1M at lower clocks then PiFast/05/AM3...:D
@Marc: allready tried this (72/82/88/100)
Printable View
@Pi: interesting to read, I'm not the only stupid guy arround, who can't even run 1M at lower clocks then PiFast/05/AM3...:D
@Marc: allready tried this (72/82/88/100)
I have had these batches which would do Vantage at 5.7ghz but could not pull GT in any bench or 32M any higher than 5.8Ghz. So having these batches are no guarantee(and the board has had other GT's in it that benched 32M as high as 6.4GHz and Vantage at 6GHz.
I have also experienced the 1M issue....:shrug:
Nick is Andre's student after all. :p:
Interesting to read, so many people reporting SuperPi problems...
Any theorie behind? Maybe IMC issue? I mean, PiFast also puts heavy load on memory/IMC...
680...nice :D
Maybe it's more along the lines of IMC cold bugging, and perhaps it's actually that 1M doesn't heat it up enough (while still accessing it plenty). Higher vdimm would heat it.
Has anyone tried running something like pifast or wprime at the same time as running 1M?
@Gautam: interesting idea, will test next weekend...
@680: not going for P55...;)
:D cpu test test test :D
vista:( or mobo dfi
Probably partial vista but yea I can beat those scores at 5.8 easy.
ocp? cpu throttles?
i have higher cpu score than that on water @ 4.8ghz OUCH!
Something happened there, I get 42k CPU with a bad 980x on water at 4.55 and vista should be around 40-41k.
testet just cputests ,becaurse my gfx suks
Very strong CPU. :D
haha guys, i was shamed until see your disscussion :D tried Brandy's 980x with re3, able to boot into windows at 6.2ghz and 5.1ghz nb but cant run 1m :rofl: and i was telling myself hell this cpu is :banana::banana::banana::banana: and gave a break :) let me tell Brandy to push it :D