Arauna: Real-time Ray Tracing Benchmark - Post your Results

4387 - Phenom II 965 @ 4013.9mhz on TRUE 120 air

http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/6451/araurabench2.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mAJORD

UPdated OP..

Well done Gaul!, big freq for a 9550.

---

thanx, MEGAHALEM rulez......for COOLER :up:

stock cooling stock settings only turbo mode on :/

Interesting error msgs there in the cmd window..

Still, you've got #1 multi socket, and a damn fine score for 2.4Ghz!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mAJORD

Interesting error msgs there in the cmd window..

---

That error will be because the 3D window is occluded by the task manager. It happens in every game where you Alt+Tab out of it or when you run it in windowed mode and partially cover it up, only applications usually don't bother reporting it.

update !!

Q9550 @ 4.45 GH


http://i47.tinypic.com/11ceb9v.jpg

thanks gaul!, is that score 4850?

yngdrw: veryt interesting.. thanks

Seems to be a decent score compared to others so far. 3957

http://i.imgur.com/sYXuo.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mAJORD

Interesting error msgs there in the cmd window..

Still, you've got #1 multi socket, and a damn fine score for 2.4Ghz!

---

mAJORD: The bench from what I've found runs nomatter if it errors or not, I've gotten the same error's before and even screem corruption in the window :ROTF: but it keeps running and doesn't crash. ;) I guess as long as it still outputs a score it's valid. :p:

score: 3768 , x4 940be @ 3640mhz 1.4725v nb @2500mhz, ram @ 555mhz (1110) 5-5-5-15 2t

http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/7807/benche.jpg

and since that's as near as makes no difference identical to Jokester_wild for core speed and very close of ram some comparison can be made between Q6600 and x4 940br, as if there isn't enough in the world ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cheffy

score: 3768 , x4 940be @ 3640mhz 1.4725v nb @2500mhz, ram @ 555mhz (1110) 5-5-5-15 2t
and since that's as near as makes no difference identical to Jokester_wild for core speed and very close of ram some comparison can be made between Q6600 and x4 940br, as if there isn't enough in the world ;)

---

Ah! very close system specs. Almost par. Pretty close results as well though.

A rather lame 2250 here.

http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/s...validation.jpg

The CPU usage never went up over 69% and I don't know whether CPU-Z is reporting the clockspeeds correctly as it is saying the cores are set at 800mhz when they should be at 2.2. I'm wondering if AMD cool 'n quiet is activated or comething like that but I didn't see anything like that when last I had a look in the motherboards bios.

I'm using a pair of Istanbul Opteron 2427's.

Core 2's can hang in but just barely.....3091

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...la/arauna1.jpg

I will run it on my Q6600 also

WZ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WeldZilla

Core 2's can hang in but just barely.....

---

Cant read any numbers on the resized pics.

uh ....3091

WZ

UPdated!

Well done Weldzilla, #1 in Dual/tri ranking. Very good score for a dualcore. As mentioned can't read figures very well so correct me if I messed up any number.s

Chris_Redfield: You seem to have issues there for sure, you should be in the ballpark of Particles score of 4000 since he's running the same CPU.

Perhaps you have a Cool n Quiet issue?. Taking freq scaling into account The score is indicative of it running at less than half rated frequency, so it indeed may be runing at 800Mhz.
I've hesitated on posting your score incase you want to sort out the issue first :p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by poke349

I wonder if limiting to one stick per channel might give better timings or lower latency... (I've got 4 sticks per channel in my workstation...)

Not like I'm gonna try it though... since I don't have physical access to it while I'm at school, nor do I want to mess my ram config anymore...

---

It definately will. More sticks on each channel adds latency. Search "How FB-DIMM's Work" on here or 2cpu.com.. or google ;)

edit - for the record I peak at 72% CPU Utilization and average 50-65% with the Dual E5450's. Testing my T7400 now.

1267 on a T7400ES @ stock 2.16ghz in a laptop lol :)

Ok, my first entry:

http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/9...26ghzmem16.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

First Phenom X6 here as well :D

Xeon 2.4ghz ES @ 4ghz (6 cores, 12 threads)
3x2gb DDR3 @ 9-9-9

7640.... :)

975EE @ 4.14GHz (reported CPUz is slightly off with the Classified) HT on, ram is Dominator GT @ 2000MHz timings in sig. Not done yet but holding on more OCing for now since it's crunching for WCG...

Score: 5843

http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/1...b284ghzmem.png

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Slightly better run.

EDIT:

Score:5926

http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/537...b285ghzmem.png

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

At this rate I will crack 6000 by the end of week :D

Seems lower given clock speed and timings however other things are running on this system that I could not shut off during the tests!

Are you SURE the GPU has no influence?
I remember the REALSTORM raytrace bench definitely WAS impacted by GPU!

http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t...f?t=1272926168

Guys, all this CPU power should be used on WCG for this week. No benching for this week! :yepp: :p:
Nice results though. Looking forward to more come 8th of may ;)

980X HT ON 4.22 GHz

I believe GPU is indeed making this run faster! It's 2000 pts faster than my W3520!

http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t...f?t=1272937236

One more for the road :D 8849

http://img708.imageshack.us/img708/172/66311833.jpg