Yes windows 7 64 bit. I would say worse than XP 32bit as i have no clue how to tweak this OS. :shrug:
Printable View
Yes windows 7 64 bit. I would say worse than XP 32bit as i have no clue how to tweak this OS. :shrug:
no cores unlocked but this is what i get. :D
http://h.imagehost.org/t/0922/X2_4000_png.jpg
* Phenom II X2 550BE
* Biostar TA790GX A3+
* Kingston Value Ram DDR3 1333 (CL9)
* Scythe Mugen 2
* Vista 32-bit (SP1)
Heh you made a mistake if i'm hitting 16:58m times at that speed i'm doing something seriously wrong.
and? what does this have to do with anything i said?
the price of beans in the southern states have surprised me too in the last ten monthsQuote:
'Stress your rig to failing'? If it fails stress-testing, then you need to ease up on your overclock. If it fails (eg. dies) during stress-testing, then you're just being far, far too zealous in your clocking, aren't you..?
Just to clarify, I'm not commenting on the thread, just KarbonKids comments, but with cheese prices the way they are, then i would seriously consider vegan :up:Quote:
Just to clarify, I'm not commenting on the thread, just soundood's comments. A 4GHz benchmark or even CPU-Z stable club is fine by me :up:
Every thing i Own is watercooled...............
You guys are Rocking with these Air Runs...Keep it up ,,Great work with the Thread OP..
What are you dude? The Benchmark Nazi ?
That's way too many benchmarks for anyone to run just to be on "your list". I'd decide which two benchmarks test heat and stability best and stick with those. I'd suggest Superpi 32M and 3dmark 2006/Vantage, seeing as once a chip goes through those two without locking up, there isn't any real need for Cinebench R10.
Perkam
the reason I started this thread is to compare an amd chip which running @4ghz on air,and compare with XS members,so that we can learn from each other setups.
You dont need to do all of the benchmark.just one is enough.I choose the benchmark because:
superpi:it's single thread.amd doing worse than intel in this bencmark
3dmark06:simulate gaming performance on dx9
3dmark vantage:simulate gaming performance on dx10
cinebench R10:sim ulate 3d rendering performa.
Your input is noted
Maybe take this,
http://www.jens.tauchclub-krems.at/d...enchmarks.html
easy to use, nothing to install or registrate, pretty heavy cpu test.
http://rol-co.nl/xs/4gdiv.jpg
do you use same hardware and setups for that superpi 32M?
impressive result :up:
I see that benchmark more 'Intel friendly' eh? :D
yes this was the same , 4005 mhz it was running. mounted the true normal now , the memory will fit just near it at bank 3-4. :)
whats so impressive? and yes you're not gona win that fritz benchmark with those amd's but the test is good stress....try it.
Here are my results:
http://www.geocities.com/johnvuong2000/3dmark06.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/johnvuong20...arkvantage.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/johnvuong2000/cinebench.jpg
http://www.geocities.com/johnvuong2000/superpi.jpg
Am I missing anything to be in your club?
Sorry about that, I'll upload it on Imageshack, something is wrong with Yahoo GeoCities:
http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/3725/superpir.jpg http://img20.imageshack.us/img20/sup...pg/1/w1680.png
http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/8743/3dmark06kmf.jpg http://img142.imageshack.us/img142/3...jpg/1/w948.png
http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/447...rkvantagep.jpg http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/3dm...pg/1/w1680.png
http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/9843/cinebench.jpg http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/c...pg/1/w2704.png
Chrono Detector, both your cinebench and 32M results are very bad! Either your NB and/or memory are running at a very low speed or your OS is messed up really bad.
edit: just saw you only have 2 cores running. Still, 32M is way too slow. At 4GHz you should be looking at a little over or even below 17 minutes.
@Rol-Co--->IMO, it is impressive that you cut down 11s with the same setups ;)
@Chrono Detector--->Welcome m8
what is your other hardware you use? Mobo, RAM(s), Cooling? and the try 3DMark Vantage once more, this time, without PhysX accelerator, ok?
as for superpi, maybe your RAM speed and timings, also your NB frequency runs at low speed and loose timings. just guessing because you dont provide CPU-Z memory tab
I do envy your Cinebench result though.I'm gonna try x64 OS to catch up with you ;)
List Updated on page 1
I down cored to 1 core got to 4.0ghz temp where 40C and I still got a bsod..... :/ stable 3.8ghz though.
why only 15mhz more?why not make it 150mhz more?mine cant clocked higher without locking up/bsod.and my rams cant do CL6 with 1,9v.gonna try 2v
what is your vcore?mine using 1,385v @3,8ghz but I had to use >1,525v to get to 4ghz
Here is my screenshot of my CPU-Z the memory tab:
http://www.overclock.net/gallery/data/500/cpuz2.png
Yeah the frequency does look low, any ideas how to increase it? Still new to this overclock thing.
Yeah my specs are on my signature on the second image, but I'll post it here anyway:
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-720D-US3
RAM: G.Skill 4GB DDR2 800Mhz RAM
Cooling: Noctua NH-U12P
In Bios run your memory timings at DDR1066 instead of DDR800
guys on ddr II wanting to come close to ddr III 32m times need to 4-4-4 1000+ and high NB ;) 5-5-5 is not faster not even at 1200+