Ci7-975EE & EVGA E790 Classified modPI32M WR

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-14-2009, 02:09 AM
kiwi

Quote:

Originally Posted by fredyama

Others: WindowsXP Pro SP3

Is it only for trial runs or XP is now #1 choice instead of 2k3?

Congrats :)

Very good example (as always from TeamJapan) how WR setup and posts are made, respect :up:
06-14-2009, 02:31 AM
hey

i was expecting this :D
06-14-2009, 04:26 AM
fredyama

Again, thanks all for your hearty words:)

@massman
Thanks for the static data however, the real OC world is so dynamic to consider many variables especially under extreme cooling as you know:D

@kiwi
kyosen made extensive tests and the XPSP3 results were slightly faster than those of 2K3SP2; believe someone from Team Italy showed us the same in the past.
06-14-2009, 06:09 AM
Bullet92

:shocked:

fredyama is back in the action. Cogratulation man, you're the 32M king :worship:
06-14-2009, 06:59 AM
zalbard

Grats guys, really impressive! :D
Woah at uncore frequency!!! :shocked:
06-14-2009, 08:03 AM
pippo369

Congratulation's Fredyama san. :up:
06-14-2009, 08:41 AM
saaya

cheeeaaaattt!!!! fake!!! ^^

congrats fredyama-sensei and duck-san! :toast:
too bad i couldnt meet up with you guys in tookyo in april...
06-14-2009, 10:03 AM
qballe

noce to C U back , congraz for WR ! :up:
06-14-2009, 12:05 PM
gandalfone

Quote:

Originally Posted by fredyama

Again, thanks all for your hearty words:)

@massman
Thanks for the static data however, the real OC world is so dynamic to consider many variables especially under extreme cooling as you know:D

@kiwi
kyosen made extensive tests and the XPSP3 results were slightly faster than those of 2K3SP2; believe someone from Team Italy showed us the same in the past.

yha I remember it:)
And I See you use eram...I like it so much it. Its efficency in winxp is better than 2k3
06-14-2009, 01:50 PM
hipro5

Nice one my friend... :D

Let me tweak this "flat run" and I'll be back... :D

P.S. This was done at LOW CPU frequency... ;)

P.S. 2 This was done with only 1.47VCore....Guess were it benches with 1.56VCore... :D

P.S. 3 It was done on a Foxconn BloodRage - STILL waiting for a mobo IF "someone" hears.... :(
In the end I will be "forced" to bench with the Foxconn I think... :(
Helloooooo!..... :D

http://www.hwbox.gr/attachment.php?a...2&d=1245001986
06-14-2009, 03:32 PM
gandalfone

Hehe....Hipro the blood is a fast board
06-14-2009, 04:13 PM
The-Fox

gandalfone is right, the Bloodrage is one of the fastest X58 boards out there.

Hipro, get yourself a good 6GB DDR3 Kit and, bump that uncore two noches and you got yourself a SPi 32M WR baby :D

Nice chip BTW.
06-14-2009, 04:57 PM
LardArse

Quote:

Originally Posted by hipro5

Nice one my friend... :D

Let me tweak this "flat run" and I'll be back... :D

P.S. This was done at LOW CPU frequency... ;)

P.S. 2 This was done with only 1.47VCore....Guess were it benches with 1.56VCore... :D

P.S. 3 It was done on a Foxconn BloodRage - STILL waiting for a mobo IF "someone" hears.... :(
In the end I will be "forced" to bench with the Foxconn I think... :(
Helloooooo!..... :D

If I could, I'd send you the Classified in a heart beat Georgie. The people who can sux.....
06-14-2009, 06:03 PM
Benji Tshi

Wonderful 32M, but why did you use such low memory clocks ?
06-14-2009, 06:22 PM
eva2000

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benji Tshi

Wonderful 32M, but why did you use such low memory clocks ?

no need for high mem clocks if you push uncore frequency (proof) - fredyama had uncore >5000mhz hehe
06-14-2009, 06:27 PM
Gautam

Unless I'm reading wrong, all you "proved" is that uncore helps, not that memory does not help.
06-14-2009, 06:31 PM
eva2000

yeah that's what i'm getting at... :)
06-14-2009, 06:31 PM
dinos22

give the guy a chance...he literally just started benching with the setup lol

there is definitely room for improvement but he knows it anyways

i'm sure that we will be asking DAMN HOW DID YOU DO THAT very soon

:D
06-14-2009, 06:51 PM
Benji Tshi

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

no need for high mem clocks if you push uncore frequency (proof) - fredyama had uncore >5000mhz hehe

As Gautam said, it doesn't proove that 1100Mhz+ won't help...

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

give the guy a chance...he literally just started benching with the setup lol

there is definitely room for improvement but he knows it anyways

i'm sure that we will be asking DAMN HOW DID YOU DO THAT very soon

:D

Maybe, but i'm asking this because 90% of the 32M i saw these days are done with less than 1000Mhz mem clocks...It's amazing because all your sticks can easily hit 1050 C7.
I'm sure it will be better with higher clocks, and even if it doesn't help so much, it will help (every ms is goo to take).
06-14-2009, 08:38 PM
hipro5

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benji Tshi

Maybe, but i'm asking this because 90% of the 32M i saw these days are done with less than 1000Mhz mem clocks...It's amazing because all your sticks can easily hit 1050 C7.
I'm sure it will be better with higher clocks, and even if it doesn't help so much, it will help (every ms is goo to take).

Then you haven't tested the rams at 840MHz Cas 6 - 6 - 5 - 18 - 1T and Uncore at 5040MHz.... ;)
The lower the ram frequency is with tight timmings, the lower latencies in the internal mem controler are... :)
Just wait.... ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by LardArse

If I could, I'd send you the Classified in a heart beat Georgie. The people who can sux.....

I understand my friend....Don't worry... :)
06-14-2009, 09:18 PM
k|ngp|n

Wonderful work Freddy and Duck :up:
06-14-2009, 09:50 PM
Benji Tshi

Quote:

Originally Posted by hipro5

Then you haven't tested the rams at 840MHz Cas 6 - 6 - 5 - 18 - 1T and Uncore at 5040MHz.... ;)
The lower the ram frequency is with tight timmings, the lower latencies in the internal mem controler are... :)
Just wait.... ;)

Ah, maybe you're right. But comparing 975 7-7-7 and 1125 7-8-7, i think the 2nd one is better no ?
BTW, i hop i can make all the tests soon :)
06-15-2009, 01:47 AM
Pt1t

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benji Tshi

Ah, maybe you're right. But comparing 975 7-7-7 and 1125 7-8-7, i think the 2nd one is better no ?
BTW, i hop i can make all the tests soon :)

More you stress the IMC , more you get stability issues under cold.
06-15-2009, 05:03 AM
fredyama

Thanks so much all:)

@hipro5
Hello my great friend George.
I still vividly remeber the OC bench session with the world greatest OCers at your lab:D
You certainly have an awesome CPU and look forward to your far out results soon;)

@saaya
:confused::(:rofl:
What a pity we missed you here in April:( Hope we can get together in Akiba next time:toast:
@k|ngp|n
Very much regret to miss the best opprtunity to bench with your F1 duck-edition. We will bench together again & send you some pictures soon.

@gandalfone
Thanks for your confirmation:up:

@Pt1t
Yep, definitely many weird things happen under extreme cooling:D

About memory settings & modPI, perhaps the below database may be of your interest.
No need to post your comments on these results, please:D

8M Ranking at tanuki, 45GP-i7 at tanuki & 32M Ranking at OMEGA

:toast:
06-18-2009, 03:30 AM
Pt1t

OMG i found one too :D

http://www.pt1t.eu/public/X58/975/45B/975xe_45B.jpg

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page