Incredible work! :up:
Printable View
Incredible work! :up:
Thicker fans? doesn't that defeat the purpose As stackable being for those limited on space? "Now available in 2x120 and 3x120mm versions, with the single 120mm coming soon, these radiators can be stacked with each other or with our existing MCR-QP series, to provide a space saving, extreme performance upgrade at low cost" That's direct from swiftechs web site.
"to provide a space saving" false if you 38mm!
"extreme performance upgrade at low cost" false $78+$50=$128!
Relax man, more testing results are coming in. I don't have much faith in the fans used in this test. As seen from Vapors excellent fan testing it does make a big difference what fans are used. I'll do some very unscientifically testing with my my stack as soon as I get it with Petras YL Low/Medium and Ultra Kazes.
Taylor01
You cannot use closed corner Yate Loons with a MCR Stack anyway, so its academic. You cannot use MCR Stacks regardless of how they perform.
Excellent data HES. I appreciate the work you did that will help me and many others. I've been delaying personal upgrades to my watercooling builds, waiting for the continuation of your first testing and it was worth the wait. I'm personally not surprised by the results though. I had a feeling that stacking was just way too good to be true and that if it was significantly productive or even equivalent in performance to a non-sandwiched radiator without the sacrafice of comfortable noise levels, that manufacturers would have came up with their own design schemes much earlier. But the confirmation from this testing was needed.
I also would be eager to see results with higher performance fans, although I would not be interested at that point being that silence is as important to me as performance. Now if a sandwiched 120 rad with SLIGHTLY louder fans was SIGNIFICANTLY better performing than a 220 radiator with more queit fans than the sandwich would be very helpful to those who perfer smaller cases such as myself. But if the sandwiched 120 is louder and only 2 degrees better than the 220, then I'll find a way to make that 220 fit If I feel I truly need the extra radiator to begin with.
It's unfortunate that the lack of innovation in the CPU fan industry so greatly, directly effects advancement in the watercooling industry. Maybe if we all boycott the fan companies until they come up with something new, maybe then they'll laugh hysterically and tell us all to go #$%^ ourselves?? lol
We covered this already,
http://www.rsvppost.com/wp-content/u...ct-tape-3m.jpg
I don’t know if anyone has tried this configuration, but it should work better with lower speed fans. It would require a little more work and slightly greater volume, but should fit into 5 ¼ inch bay. The center baffle could be beveled to direct flow out towards the sides or the ends of the radiators. One could also add small fans (25mm to 40mm) along the edges of the center baffle to lower the pressure between the radiators.
nice review :up:
I think ppl need to look at this test a little more closely to see that stacking isn't exactly the failure it appears to be. The fans used are of the poorest quality and are the largest part of the miserable performance. Have a look for yourself.
Nanoxia FX-1250
I'll agree with you that 2 separate rads will work better nik but this "test" is making stacking look far worse than what it should.
I just don't see stacking as one of the cardinal sins every self proclaimed "pro" says it is (I'm not refer to you here;)). Is it the perfect setup?...no, far from it, but it is an option for some ppl with limited space.
have it tested with a delta fan yet?
or other high pressure fans? MCR series is tight finned
well it's tigher than TC i had
but i still cant believe it scored badly here
i tried stacking with TC 120.3 and MCR320 and the temps are quite good .. around ~4c lower ... i even used my cheapo logistics UV fan and a FN121 (it's ghetto mix)
therefore i'm quite convienced it's workable
Waterlogged, you did read my conclusion, yes?
I explicitly stated that the results depend on airflow and the fan's pressure. In fact, demonstrating this was the whole point of the second half of the test.
The fans are not "of the poorest quality", they are simply very good silent fans (and silent doesn't mean quiet, it means silent). Such silent fans are used by many people in Liquid cooling setups since for many, the main benefit of liquid cooling is reduced noise.
Actually, yes I did read your conclusion, but it seems most ppl aren't, or at least they aren't comprehending it.
When compared to ZM-F3's or S-Flex E, F or G, yeah, those are very poor quality fans. If I had to guess, I'd put them somewhere around the Noctua in this test as far as rad usage. Those numbers look about as made up as SilenX's. You can still have reasonable dB's and cooling power with any of the fans I mentioned.
Unfortunately, I have not yet compared nanoxias to S-FLEXs on a radiator, but on a TRUE, the nanoxias perform slightly better at equal rpms.
Can't be all bad.