OH!It is FUTTOU-KUNQuote:
Originally Posted by Lightman
I am in the depths most（It is the left depths）:p:
I tested a CPU of the sixth
However, a clock of the NB did not lengthen:shakes:
11.453ｓ
http://cal930.sakura.ne.jp/cgi-bin/c.../file/6248.PNG
Printable View
OH!It is FUTTOU-KUNQuote:
Originally Posted by Lightman
I am in the depths most（It is the left depths）:p:
I tested a CPU of the sixth
However, a clock of the NB did not lengthen:shakes:
11.453ｓ
http://cal930.sakura.ne.jp/cgi-bin/c.../file/6248.PNG
Sorry CAL :p:
I need new brain or something :rofl:
Non the less great clocks and superb SuperPi score :clap:
great job =)
i cant wait to test it myself
congrats guys
i doubt that all cores ran at 6.4GhzQuote:
Originally Posted by Dagalidis
you can make core0 run at that speed and rest at 3Ghz if you want
it helps CPU MHz OC A LOT :D
Hi,dinos22-sanQuote:
Originally Posted by dinos22
About it, I did the post in #47 of this thread :p:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/Forums/...3&postcount=47
This CPU's checked every core...
core#0 ... 6.2Ghz
core#1 ... 6.1GHz
core#2 ... 6.2GHz
core#3 ... 6.4Ghz
Is not it admitted that all cores do not work with the same clock? :confused:
I think that there is a merit when I operate a limit in each core.
Do not you think that it is a good method?
I think that it is a merit only by the AMD CPU.
However, I operate all cores with the same clock from next and report it if there is criticism. :)
it's totally fine running each core at different speed. For 1m or CPUz you can have 3 cores at stock and only one at the limit - it's just fine for thoose benches. I am doing that all the time as well.
Just for wprime and 06 etc I am running all clocks at the same speed. But that just because I never tested if I could gain some points with some cores a bit higher.
Nice work Team Japan ;):cool:
I wonder how retail phenoms do against cherry picked ones? :)
Anyone who tried 6+ on retail?
:up:
Look into Massman threads ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by jenner
Very nice!
Love to see some more results