maybe all 8000 series should be EOL
and only :
9600GT
9800GTS
9800GTX
9800GX2
if not you have 5 nVidia cards in the 180$ -349$ range
9600GT
8800GT
8800GTS
9800GTS
9800GTX
:shrug:
regards
Printable View
512BIT BUS width is... not necessary.
First of all, we already have fast GDDR4 ( and GDDR5 ) RAM that can give us more than the "required" bandwidth combined with a 384BIT BUS.
It also costs a lot in transistor count.
384BIT and faster RAM = cheaper, efficient, and easier to manufacture.
Fix'd :DQuote:
9800GTX is CRAP
if it is 350$ that would be great, b/c then i could step-up for free :)
Well, the g92 prices are dropping, 8800GTS is under $250, and $8800GT is under $200
So $300 for 9800GTX 512MB isn't thaay bad, bute $280 would be better.
and $330 for the 1gb version
and $400 for the 2gb
i say
IMO to be a genuine upgrade from the 8800GT 512MB, you need to go for a 1GB card. Otherwise, with the 9 series you are just getting more of the same card you already bought before.
ya i will go get a 8800 gtx and than step up and evga will pay me:ROTF:Quote:
if it is 350$ that would be great, b/c then i could step-up for free
i need some 9800 vs. 8800gts 640mb benches. I need to know where my card stands up to these.
ima just stick with my 2 gtx's
this is refreshing to see
low price offer from nvidia >> LOL!!!!
i think they are seriously trying to sell the idea of tripple SLI this time round
but no matter what ppl would complain
now i personally haven't looked at the GFX card slides yet so can't comment on the pricing but if the price is correct and we start buying these for $300 you are going to buy a monster powerhouse tripple SLI GFX setup for $900 (GFXs only)
now we all know how much Ultras used to cost and their pricing didn't really change a hack of a lot)
that sounds pretty bloody good to me.
but i'm no gamer. i don't give a :banana::banana::banana::banana: really. my 8800GT is great for my rig in all honestly and will serve me well for many many years to come i'm sure
i hate the idea of having a such a power hungry system though :rolleyes:......tripple SLI or quad SLI, quad core, lots of drives >> where does it end
look on the bright side guys, at least it has a black PCB :up:
seriously though, i don't might this all at since i'm still on a X1900XT256, i always wanted to own a GTX. but i do agree with you most of you about how this "new" card isn't really new at all.
Man im loving the price..............
will 2 x 9800gtx beat the gx2? Seems kind of obvious.... so why would anyone buy the gx2?
bus size doesn't matter
memory performance does.
if this uses fast enough RAM it won't matter.
if the clock speed of the RAM was increased by 50% and the bus width was decreased by 33%(which is the case here) then it shouldn't matter.
data transferred = frequency of transfers * size of transfers
LOL? :)
So much for the best and latest games optimized for quad core, gain from 2>3>4 cores, nV marketing just tried crashing that belief in one shot right there... don't waste your cash on a $1k CPU, buy a $300 GPU and get much better gaming perf.
What's better, the games they list as having no to negligible C2D 2.67G>Yorkfield 3G improvement includes: Lost Planet, World in Conflict, Company of Heroes, Call of Duty 4, Crysis, Unreal Tournament 3, Bioshock, Oblivion... they really didn't spare anything which has been mythed over.
I would love to put to test this presentation through its paces, if I could be bothered enough or had the demand to.
On another note, nV has pretty much stalled since G80GTX in November '06, which was a ground shattering technology for it's time, albeit monstrously expensive... but $300, if true, then I welcome very much.
Well i think 9800gtx will be the less exciting high end product that industry have seen in years.
$299 actually sounds right for this card. It's basically just a higher binned 8800GTS G92, the G92 cost like $200-250 right now, so another $50 on top of that is fair for a higher end product. They still have the 9800GX2 for their flagship.