will come later..Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBull78
Printable View
will come later..Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBull78
i think amd doesn't want to embarrass themselves... their k8 duallies will be able to beat their k10 ones, and that will look bad for a new product... k10 just can't clock, be it one core or 4, so until amd can solve that problem, dual cores will remain k8 based.Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBull78
Kuma was delayed in late October to mid Q2 for the first.
Ohh WoW. That is bad. They should've first build the k10 dual cores and then quads since quads don't even cover 20% of the market. Wtf were they thinking...Quote:
Originally Posted by cky2k6
quads would have brought in a lot more money if they had gotten it down from the start, that's why a lot more r&d money was put towards it, and they might as well fix their quads since they have put this much time and money towards it and it'll be a while until they get 45nm quads along
All of you guys seem to think this set back is destroying AMD:rolleyes: I have news for you its not! Perhaps its perceived that way on this and other OC Forums but in reality 89% of the PC Sector is mainstream users and consumers that would not know the difference and could care less. Moreover its only the Enthusiast community and Sever segment that is frowning upon this whole situation and of course leaning more towards the the OC Community that hypes this way out of proportion.Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBull78
Does that make us Geeks?Quote:
Originally Posted by Brother Esau
YES:D ......Just remember I come here so I guess I am a geek as well:rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBull78
What really put AMD in bad financial peril was the amount of time it took them to release new products to because even average John Q Public wants the latest and greatest regardless of how well it does. Just like Conroe with the Motherboard situation when they first came out they sucked and had allot of issues but people were lining up for that ass whoopin anyways!:D
Conroe just iced it but before conroe not sure if u remember there was this cpu called dothan i think which gave a glipse of the upcoming tech from intel. If im not mistaken it was the same intel design team that introduced dothan which later became to be conroe.Quote:
Originally Posted by Brother Esau
You are correct and you get the CIGAR:hrhr:
why would they make a "native quadcore" design a dualcore first???? give your head a shake...Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBull78
Because in reality K10h is a server chip. and a damn good one (except for TLB)Quote:
Originally Posted by nunchucka
That's where the money is ;)
http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquir...-amd-quad-core
Not sure if u remember there was this chip called Pentium III.....Quote:
Originally Posted by RedBull78
KTE thanks for the info, although 2.6GHz max is quite dissapointing for a 2core cpu. I think i might get a AM2+ mobo and a 5000BE and wait for shanghai early next year
might well just be that MSI board that has BIOS_bugs :slash:Quote:
Originally Posted by Thesavage
and you might NOT want to overclock a CPU with TLB bug
its the whole point that AMD dont release higher clocked CPUs based on B2 as they might or will make the system unstable if its clocked to high
but all in all B3 should fix this.. :)
I have that combo for couple months no and didn't have any problems so far...Quote:
Originally Posted by spicypixel