Phenom X4 vs. Yorkfield tested in Crysis

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

10-29-2007, 12:08 PM
BeardyMan

Quote:

Originally Posted by gundersausage

Poor kid couldn't afford a quadcore :)

My B3 kentsfield did ran 3.8ghz air stable at 1.45V boxed cooled...
I can afford more HW then you, i can assure you that :D
10-29-2007, 12:11 PM
Bail_w

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeardyMan

My B3 kentsfield did ran 3.8ghz air stable at 1.45V boxed cooled...
I can afford more HW then you, i can assure you that :D

a B3 kentsfield on air 3.8ghz with 1.45v is very decent. Quit the talk, show some proofs. also, are you sure thats 100% stable?
10-29-2007, 12:13 PM
BeardyMan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bail_w

a B3 kentsfield on air 3.8ghz with 1.45v is very decent. Quit the talk, show some proofs. also, are you sure thats 100% stable?

It did ran wprime 1024mb without any problems :)

I sold it though since i was in a pi mood back then.
10-29-2007, 12:14 PM
gundersausage

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeardyMan

My B3 kentsfield did ran 3.8ghz air stable at 1.45V boxed cooled...
I can afford more HW then you, i can assure you that :D

Sure you can Princess :p:
10-29-2007, 12:16 PM
BeardyMan

Quote:

Originally Posted by gundersausage

Sure you can Princess :p:

I can yes :) i have the luck for getting overpaid ;)
10-29-2007, 12:19 PM
CyberDruid

AMD Fanboy uses Core 2 Duo Benchmark to back up his love for AMD...

ooooooookay
10-29-2007, 12:19 PM
Bail_w

All talk, no proof, useless. Anyway time to get back to the topic.
10-29-2007, 12:21 PM
gundersausage

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeardyMan

I can yes :) i have the luck for getting overpaid ;)

Riiiiiight *Dr Evil voice*
10-29-2007, 12:24 PM
PhilDoc

Maybe you two ladies can do this in a pm and save the thread. :D
10-29-2007, 12:27 PM
BeardyMan

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bail_w

All talk, no proof, useless. Anyway time to get back to the topic.

That's because i didn't savec much from that cpu , al i could find was a useless 1M superpi run :)
But it did run during the 6days that i had the cpu at those speeds.
http://users.telenet.be/kuan/13.5.JPG
10-29-2007, 01:21 PM
funnyperson1

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeardyMan

it didn't loose, its has been overclocked to a 3.0ghz speed, but a 3.0ghz phenom would have 2.6ghz NB clock, not 1.6ghz wich indicates this chip is a 2.0 phenom? 50% overclock on air? can't see any E68500 pull that of ;)

I doubt that will make a wee bit of a difference considering these tests were run with a single card. HT bandwith is not the problem here, AMD has that in droves even at 1.6ghz NB clock, certainly more than Intel's FSB. The problem is that the processor is not computing :banana::banana::banana::banana: fast enough, all the bandwith in the world won't fix that.

Can we please stop the epeen contest please, we get it...you're rich....you have sick hardware, good for you.
10-29-2007, 02:12 PM
Psycho_eddie

This thread has been somewhat sidetracked... i too dont understand why this 'rich guy' is posting Intel Super pi benches when hes supposted to be backing up Amd??
10-29-2007, 02:14 PM
zornundo

Quote:

Originally Posted by MR_SmartAss

They should have tested Yorkfield on X38 on FSB 2000MHz using DDR3 1333MHz CL5 5-5-5 CR 1T

Yeah, that'd be real price-conscious :rofl:
10-29-2007, 02:25 PM
boban10

Omg most people are still blind. I was thinkink my previous post will open eyes to some people, well here is again, look at this pictures:

http://www.expreview.com/img/news/071028/Crysis_k10.jpg

http://www.expreview.com/img/news/07...sis_qx9650.jpg

http://www.expreview.com/img/news/07...sis_qx6850.jpg

http://www.expreview.com/img/news/07...ysis_e6850.jpg

Something strange or no ? Or im the only one in entire internet world to see this diference in minimum fps. :)
10-29-2007, 04:05 PM
bt_medic04

all the flaming over one piss poor comparison is about as irritating as getting pounded in the poopshoot by ron jeremy wearing a sandpaper condom. it all comes down to this: can the average joe buy a phenom or a yorkfield right now? nope didnt think so.

until the chips are available at retail, take these results with a grain of salt as many more of them will follow until the chips are actually released. fwiw its nice to see amd in the same ballpark as intel even if the testing was flawed (gpu bound)
10-29-2007, 04:09 PM
akaBruno

:D I'd prefer Lassie w/ a Lambskin.
10-29-2007, 04:20 PM
Carfax

Once again, people are jumping to conclusions. These results aren't just fishy, but SUPER fishy!

In particular the minimum FPS for Phenom.

There is no reason whatsoever, from a hardware perspective, that the Phenom should have such a mediocre minimum FPS score.

Something is definitely amiss.
10-29-2007, 04:27 PM
Zytek_Fan

This bench is complete fraud. No point discussing it.
10-30-2007, 02:37 AM
gundersausage

Quote:

Originally Posted by PhilDoc

Maybe you two ladies can do this in a pm and save the thread. :D

That aint no lady, that's my wife
10-30-2007, 02:56 AM
BeardyMan

Quote:

Originally Posted by gundersausage

That aint no lady, that's my wife

i see, he loves hairy holes :D

*takes ignore list *

:D
10-30-2007, 02:57 AM
gundersausage

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeardyMan

i see, he loves hairy holes :D

Seriously dude, English is not your first language is it?
10-30-2007, 02:59 AM
BeardyMan

Quote:

Originally Posted by gundersausage

Seriously dude, English is not your first language is it?

Ofcourse not du kleines mädchen :D
10-30-2007, 03:00 AM
mad_skills

Quote:

Originally Posted by MR_SmartAss

There are other benches too, check the thread about the Barcelona 2350 (B1). are those benches a fraud too?

i like those ones..7s in SPi 1M with 400MHz boost..:) nice..on server rig and crappy ram..
10-30-2007, 03:05 AM
gundersausage

Quote:

Originally Posted by BeardyMan

Ofcourse not du kleines mädchen :D

Oh thank god, because you make no sense at all.. hey nice try with the whole world domination thing twice last century.. but just like AMD.. you got owned and boned :D

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page