Printable View
I tried that long before and just tried it again today knowing that I'll hit a looping failed loading coretemp error...and it still does...0.94 doesn't have looping error but only one error poped out. 0.94 can be opened but all the readings are messed up..Quote:
Originally Posted by Flinch
I think I've to dissable driver signing but I'm still figuring out how to do that..
Quote:
Originally Posted by -n7-
Thanks so much, I just tried exactly what you've provided up there.
I won't do a restart do just, I'm waiting for my priming to pass 8+ hour mark ;)
Yes it's still stable as of now.
I still so excited to know that this new Q6600 G0 runs cooler than my golden E6700, it's unbelieable. I wasn't having high hope for running quad on air, even with a lapped TR U120 X but it looks like it has helped:clap:
8x450 with only 1.38 vcore is one hell of a quad core.. :) very nice.. :)
mm.. can you find the maximum fsb?? no stability test ofcource.. just screenies.. :) I want to know whats your fsb wall on air.. :D
very nice chip you got there.. :)
yes of course, will do that in about an hour.Quote:
Originally Posted by erwinz
Still waiting priming to pass +8hrs :)
thanks.. :) will wait for it.. :D hope you can do 500fsb.. :) or more.. heheheQuote:
Originally Posted by XtremeTiramisu
7x515 fsb prime stable will be some quad.. :) good luck..
woah congrats ... can you do some max FSB tests on the cpu to see if it can do >500FSB ?Quote:
Originally Posted by XtremeTiramisu
and while you're at it post VID value from coretemp :DQuote:
Originally Posted by eva2000
The luck of some people. One cherry chip right after the other. Totally gonna hit 8 hours if you hit 7 already.Quote:
Originally Posted by XtremeTiramisu
Good chip, but your temp are wrong ... no tool can read G0 temp correctly now ...
Look at Priming or Orthos for Throttling of Cores, on this chip throttling starts at 75 degrees ... you will see, if your cores are throttling temp is above 75 degrees ...
Nice work!
Same batch as me :D.
Hopefully, I can attain similar results. Right now, I'm priming 334x9 (3 Ghz) @ 1.2500 vcore in bios (1.2000V real).
who CARES about 8 hours of priming...NO ONE will ever be doing that in a real world operating environemnt...SO...get on with clocking that baby up!;)Quote:
Originally Posted by XtremeTiramisu
Finally a 8+ hours Prime stable. 1.38v loaded and 57~61c from 4 cores :cool:
It's not as hot as during the day time now, ambient temp has dropped down to 23c from 27~29c in the earlier in the afternoon. Hence, core temps dropped a little too :up:
I'm sure 3.6ghz on air isn't the max stable OC just yet but it's the final stable OC at this stage.
I'm going to test max FSB and suicide screenies later as per the demands. Hopefully 4ghz on air suicide screeny ! :D
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/6...ometrueoz8.jpg
He is a folder, so of course he will.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace-a-Rue
very nice q6600 indeed.. :) hehehe now for the highest fsb.. hehehe go go go :)Quote:
Originally Posted by XtremeTiramisu
4 GHz 1st :D
**I really think P35 chipset helps in the succesful overclock and stability of the quad core.. :D
Quote:
Originally Posted by -n7-
Tried your method, restarted the computer and run as admin still gives me looping error failed coretemp load!
and now I cannot even go into control panel. Everytime I want to open it, it's gone in a blink of a sec. Just like how we open Intel TAT on Vista x64...
How can I revert things back to normal again?!
Thanks
i don't care about folding!:)Quote:
Originally Posted by SP33DFR34K
you should switch back to XP..forget vista with overclocking and getting test programs to function correctly..VISTA just stinks right now!Quote:
Originally Posted by XtremeTiramisu
You would probaly see more overclock on Xp!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace-a-Rue
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ace-a-Rue
Quote:
Originally Posted by SP33DFR34K
Who says I'm a folder..lol
My primary goal in OC is run my system in maximum OC'ed state for day to day use.
BUT, of course I'll test out the max FSB and some suicide screenies just so I won't get kicked out or get flamed from our lovely "XS" community:p:
Regarding Vista, it's actually x64 Vista that's kind of annoying cos Coretemp/Intel TAT isn't supported no matter what I tried.
Vista 32bit worked flawlessly though!
But I've another pair of 2GB ballistix tracer 8500 kit that I want to use for a total of 4gb configuration so I kinda want to keep x64bit Vista.
no flaming...my main focus is to get you focus on the main topic..."OVERCLOCK" the heck out of that 'G0'
I can finally use Coretemp 0.95 in Vista 64 bit. Please use the following FYI. :)
Exactly as what others and I have stated, Speedfan's core temp + 15c = Coretemps core temps.Quote:
All you have to do is type "cmd" in the Search Box included in the Vista Start menu. Next, press Ctrl + Shift + Enter to open a command prompt window with elevated privileges. Now enter bcdedit /set loadoptions DDISABLE_INTEGRITY_CHECKS in order to disable Driver Signing and reboot.
It's always your CPU Tjunction temp (100c) - DTS = core temps. Coretemp 0.95 can read the max Tjunction of the Q6600 G0 at 100c properly but Speedfan assumes the max Tjunction for the Quad is 85c like all C2D. In the end, either programs give accurate core temp readings.
http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/9190/coretempzi3.jpg
so you actually think that your temps are accurate as reported by coretemp now
i'm having trouble digesting that man
Ok, to make this clearly, I'll re-quote this informative quote from unclewebb
Quote:
I believe that SpeedFan 4.32 assumes a maximum junction temperature of 85C for the Quads when it should be using 100C. You need to add 15C to the SpeedFan reported temperatures.
Reported Temps = TjMax - DTS ( DTS is the on chip digital thermal sensor reading )
AM I AM TELLING YOU
that i don't think those temps are correct
ambient 29C
CPU (quad) idle at 3.6GHz with 1.4V 31-34C on air
no way!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hmm could this be a unique CPU sample? I find it hard to fathom your overclock on air but well done nonetheless.