Nuclearus - New Build - Benchmarks

heres my lowly quad :(

http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/474/17754ry0.jpg

2GB @ 4-4-4-12


@ 1:1 L1/L2 @ 19,xxxMB/s
@ 4:5 L1/L2 @ 17,xxxMB/s


nice quad/octal benchmark!

10525 Here:)

http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/5566/mnrlk8.jpg

Re-benched my Xeons with the new version...
12905..!! :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NapalmV5

heres my lowly quad :(, nice quad/octal benchmark!

---

:eek:

updated

Hey guys I would like to try this out but I cant read the language on the page can someone please make it in English or send me a direct link to the download?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by littleowl

Hey guys I would like to try this out but I cant read the language on the page can someone please make it in English or send me a direct link to the download?

---

This is the best we can do for now. No direct link will work for this at the moment.

Go to this page here DOWNLOAD, and click the link NuclearusMC.rar

okay, a few more of my own :)

5212 on 3700+ @ 3258mhz
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e3...2at3215Mhz.jpg

6371 on X2-3800 (939) @ 2683mhz
http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e364/mofo64/6371.jpg

SOLDNER hi m8 ill get it run in a bit had a leek on my comp lol

:up: Hey bud, nice to see you here. :clap:

Sorry to hear about your accident :)

I'll reserve you a slot shall I? ;)

This test likes RAM bandwidth, high FSBs and hates Vista. I re-ran it after adding another GB of RAM. I had to lower my RAM speed but got an extra 100 Mhz out of my CPU in the process. I figured the added CPU speed would make up for the lower performing RAM, nope. It also seems the 1.2 version runs slower than the 1.0.0.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ZNuclearus.jpg

I agree with RAM bandwith
new score with a better ram frequency:
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/7...5144ym2.th.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Major_A

This test likes RAM bandwidth, high FSBs and hates Vista. I re-ran it after adding another GB of RAM. I had to lower my RAM speed but got an extra 100 Mhz out of my CPU in the process. I figured the added CPU speed would make up for the lower performing RAM, nope. It also seems the 1.2 version runs slower than the 1.0.0.

---

Have you run 1.2 on your XP install m8?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by blackhawker

I agree with RAM bandwith
new score with a better ram frequency

---

Congrats on 5k bud......nice 1 :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SOLDNER-MOFO64

Have you run 1.2 on your XP install m8?

---

Nope, I scraped my XP install. I was spending more time in Vista and rebooting to play a game turned into a pain.

Updated with my second stick of OCZ (from RMA! :D ) Later I'm going to go for a 11,000 pass. Core speed was actually 3550mhz.

updated....nice :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SOLDNER-MOFO64

Congrats on 5k bud......nice 1 :)

---

100pts left and it will be good enough :D

blackhawker...That's a nice score for a single core Opteron! :D

indeed, but mofo64 is too near
competition will be difficult with such a good 3700

12030 for a start

Updated....CPU speed @ 3.6ghz.

new score with single core version: 5262 pts :D

http://img339.imageshack.us/img339/3...5262hd7.th.jpg

nex version of nuclearus MC: 1.2.1
I have uploaded it here: http://anonyme.archive-host.com/nucl...3i0s5qjryt.rar

it would be a good benchmark but there is FAR too much variation from one build to the next, so theres literally no consistency between the benchmarks if one person is using a different version.

why do Cores take such a big dip in 8 Queens in the multithreaded version 1.2 and score about 3 times higher in version 1.0...

:worship: to Kunaak! Excellent score!

updated with nuclearusMC 1.2.1:

http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/4...5275ez2.th.jpg

:D

Air cooled 13k dual core
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/9...4150pt7.th.jpg

I've bench it in a while, now don't have time to bench it again with the newer version:(