Same could be said about 90nm, however they on average overclock better (almost a full 400-600Mhz better than 130nm) then what they replace. While using less power.Quote:
Originally Posted by pawl
Printable View
Same could be said about 90nm, however they on average overclock better (almost a full 400-600Mhz better than 130nm) then what they replace. While using less power.Quote:
Originally Posted by pawl
I have a feeling that the 65 nm Amd Brisbane will have an improved memory controller;)
humbug memory controller. we want the new improved IPC core. they can keep the memory controller. all the whisper and inuendo about better things to come soon etc - its all rubbish.
amd had to be absolutley desperate to be desperate to break the numbering system and allow the operton socket 1207 to work to unregisterd ram. now every cheap server vendor is going to be squeazing them to let the opteron server cpus run with elcheapo ram.
and im guessing that they needed all those pins to supply the power to that hungry beast. its the new SUV of cpus.
the are running on empty. no gas.
9/10 performance problems come from not enough work being ready to be processed.Quote:
Originally Posted by pawl
Not the lack of processing power
Thats k8l The improved ipc;=)
The big thing for Amd Brisbane is
1.Improved Memory controller<---Very likely, but i cant guarantine it
2.Lower power Usage:toast:
3.And higher clocks, althought the first one may clock bad . This will depend on how mature Amd 65 nm production is. Noone knows, but my guess is that Amd have had time to mature their 65nm node.
In a few days we will know:toast:
umm, i think we can drop the intel-dubbed "K8L" and use AMD's name, K10
So there will not be AM3 CPUs (DDR3 only).Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ghost
im crossing my fingers that its more powerful than intel.. because i've always had an AMD in my computer.. and i <3 the underdog...
but then again I <3 the best.
I wonder how the market will look in February....
K8L is native quad core like Intels QX6700 right?
QX6700 has two Conroe chips sharing the FSB.
"K8L" is Greyhound/Deerhound, now renamed to certain starsQuote:
Originally Posted by brentpresley
from looking at the original post, it seems as if Kuma is multi-core, and Rana is single core?Quote:
Originally Posted by WeStSiDePLaYa
AM2+ is the name for the socket, not a kind of CPUs.Quote:
Originally Posted by doompc
AM2 CPU supports DDR2Quote:
Originally Posted by doompc
AM3 CPU supports DDR2 and DDR3
Socket AM2 mobos use DDR2
Socket AM2+ mobos use DDR2 and have HT3.0
Socket AM3 mobos use DDR3
AM2 CPUs works on socket AM2 and AM2+ mobos
AM3 CPUs works on socket AM2+ and AM3 mobos (using DDR2 or DDR3, respectively)
Easy as that! :p:
(if there's some error tell me, but I think it's correct)
from what I've heard, that looks right. AM2+ is just a bridge between AM2 and AM3. Nothing more than HT3.0 for socket AM2...?Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsama
I gess the QX6700 is not much different than 4X4, other than the cores are physically connected. Should be intersting to see how much performance gains there are from 4X4 to Rev. H. That will be a while though.
Since the Hyper Transport 3.0 is backward-compatible AM3 CPUs will work on present day AM2 boards.Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsama
According to the first CPU-Z shot of the Brisbane core, it's running at 1.3V stock. Pretty high for a 65nm part.
Linky
It may also be a cpu-z error
We will know tommorow if this is true or not
There have been rumors about initial 65nm parts needing higher voltage than expected. Let's hope it isn't true.Quote:
Originally Posted by Teroedni
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=125497
there is a link right in this forum :)
This is good enough for you ?Quote:
Originally Posted by The Ghost
http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/115...uadcorexb6.jpg
Looks like gossip wins this time ... ;)
Sounds like someone forgot than Socket M2+ is 100% compatible with Socket M2 as the only features that it adds is Hyper Transport 3 (Probabily useless, everyone knows than Chipset communications doesn't even comes close to sature the current Bandwidth than Hyper Transport gives) and split power planets for running less used parts of the Cores at lower Voltage to save power consumption independently from the rest.
and a few other things, but yes, an am2+ cpu will work in an am2 board. why bother with the +? i dunno.Quote:
Originally Posted by zir_blazer
I guess one more reason to just sit back and watch AM2. It's gonna get left behind just like 939 did. If I invest it will be AM3 as core speeds from AMD will not exceed much if any beyond 3ghz before AM3 arrives.