Thanks you all!
Yeah it should, but there is alot of bugs with X1950 and late catalysts, that holds back the performence :( But I've just bought back my -100C X1900 master card for some 05 action :DQuote:
Originally Posted by k|ngp|n
Printable View
Thanks you all!
Yeah it should, but there is alot of bugs with X1950 and late catalysts, that holds back the performence :( But I've just bought back my -100C X1900 master card for some 05 action :DQuote:
Originally Posted by k|ngp|n
90K wall smashed finally! :eek: :woot:
Great score Kinc, congratulations :toast:
Insane score Kinc !
congrats
finally you got it!!! :toast:
congrats man!
awesome score!
Marco
Awesome, how many FPS in CSS? :D
Dat is a super kool run there, as usual.. all I do over here is show "Respect" to all those who have da edge.
any 03/05/06 runs ?
I'm working on solwing the problem wehere Catalyst thinks the cards works at the max temp when is is actuall below 0C. This problem is not showing in Catalyst 6.3 and I think I first noticied it in Catalyst 6.7 or even 6.6, not sure. This problem needs to be solved for the performence to get back in 05 and 06. As it is now X1900 would be better then X1950 in 05.Quote:
Originally Posted by TaPaKaH
congrats Kinc...you deserve it. :toast:
all the time impressive results....congrats kinc ;)
grats kinc, would you say the score is held back by the cpu or gpu's?
What i mean is, whats the biggest bottleneck in your opinion, do we need faster videocards or faster cpu's for 100k?
Cpu, the only test not limited by cpu is nature. For 100k tough we will need more fps in nature as well since i doubt we will see c2d 3d stable over 5300 in the near future. Nv nature + ati system would be nice :-)Quote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
Grats again on the 90K a huge milestone for sure. :toast:
I was actualy amazed when i saw how not so good 1950 in 05 is, so that would be drivers issue?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinc
Part driver and part hardware, x1900 is better in 05. Im going to run x1900 in 05 soon to see if it fixes the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon
the best score in 05 i got with 1900xt 256mb :banana: , and I had 1900xtx and 1950xtx, you should try too :D
Very nice overclocking Kinc - congrats to your hard work :toast:
I just bought back my X1900 master that can handle -100+. Pared with my -100+ X1900XTX I hope to see great scores in 05.Quote:
Originally Posted by zbogorgon
Good luck my Friend!!
Lets se a killer score soon!!:slobber:
Kinc = da man!Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie
Charlie, G80 or even G90 wont do much for 3D01 (if anything). Afterall, reason why C2D got so much higher than P4/Athlon64 is because 3D01 is so CPU limited.
However, as you well know, G80 and company will do great things in 3DMark05 and especially 3DMark06.
Kinc, any chance you can run a Quake3 timedemo (demo001)? I'm curious if Quake3 scales to 5 digits!! ;)
X1900 Crossfire fully vmodded rigged and ready to go. Mousepots all over.
http://www.kinc.se/mall.jpg
oo, that looks really nice, go get those WRs now! :)
That rig should pull off a hardcore set of numbers, good luck kinc.
Haha! Nice work on that NB cooler!!!Quote:
Originally Posted by Kinc
I almost forgot, good luck!
Just ran the rigg and it is looking reall good. Figured I woud max out the cores on the 1900s with vmods and the results is jaw dropping. With 1.7V vcore/vddci and -100C 927/927MHz works great. With the cpu @ 4GHz that equaled 152fps in gt3 of 3dmark 05. I'm noticing serveral periods of the test that are cpu/mem limited so hopefully we will see up to 156fps in the end.
The problem running the cards so cold with these pots is that the cold is transfered very easaly to the pcb. The second internal probe of the card in atitool shiwed a temp of -33C wich is by far the lowest temp Ive seen there.
I had to shut the rig down before I could cool down the cpu bacuse the pwm area of the cards was deepfrozen.
Better insulation tomorrow :D