Nice, definitely getting this for my Allendale system :)
Thanks Andre
Printable View
Nice, definitely getting this for my Allendale system :)
Thanks Andre
can you see the c2 revision anywhere printed on the board? or would it be below heatsync?
damnit.. was looking at getting one of these boards next week.. now i dont know what to do :(
Eny beter performanse with memory bandwidth than C1?
André can you explain me the poor pi time ?
14.65 is really slow for 3.6ghz regardless of the memory timings, i've got 14.1 at 9X400 4/4/4/4 (DDR1000), 14.3 at 9X400 6/6/6/6 (DDR1000).
I've done same 14.65 with : 9X387 (DDR966) 6/6/6/18 and without os optimisation.
Is this the results of the FSB war between Asus and Gigabyte ?
Quartz modded ?
Sorry for this thread crapping but it's impossible for me to reproduce your time with the worst timings possible and 9X400, i just need an allendale to match :D
I would still like to see max dual channel, and the poor performance at these high fsb's is kida killin the point of running them.
Don't get me wrong 600fsb is nice but if you are forced to run 1 dimm and timings as slack as a bulls @$$ whats the friggin point??
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony
Did you make DDR2 1200 memory to me? I am glad that I help you test dual channel DDR2 1200.:)
Even with one stick and the worst timings possible , i can't do 14.65 @ 9x400 (DDR 1000).
Asus and gigabyte are not fair for us, those 600Mhz FSB seems not real.
André can you compare max cpu clock on this mobo and another retail , i think it should do 150Mhz better because of unreal frequency caused by changing the quartz.
Edit : BTW andré, why don't you create a new thread or updated this one when you reached 610 Mhz ?
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=121143
Do you think this result is unfair to publish it here ?
Fake like coolaler on this thread :
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=114600&page=4
I prefer a real FSB with a NB rev C1 than a C2 at 600FSB + and very poor scores...
no comment
too bad
QFT :)Quote:
Originally Posted by cpulloverclock
Thanks for the info, Andre.
I don't think I will be buying anymore mobos for awhile though. I already have too many.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmax_oc
So you think CPUZ Verified is faked?
Don't forget the key point. This is not 965C1 chip. P5B Deluxe 1.04G 965C2 will be stronger than 965C1.
http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/New-P5BD/1.JPG
http://www.iamxtreme.net/andre/New-P5BD/2.JPG
Nice:toast: ...Now those PC8888 rams got their mobo:)
Are real applications like dvdshrink and maybe winrar equally bad?
Wow i wish mine could do that. Maybe ill pick up that new revision
i tihnk its real but this guy makes a good point:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durzel
is this one of those xip skill only thing? or just knowledged people with the same setup that can reach 600fsb , too??
also tony from OCZ suggest that its running at 1600fsb strap , so the performance is extremely poor
I am rolling back to 975x and an E6600 myself. I don't feel like doing a clockgen up to my OC everytime I boot to avoid the 1333 strap post 400FSB.
I tested as others have, and my rig is definitely faster by setting 399 x 8 with the required voltages for 3.72 in the BIOS then doing a clockgen up to that speed in windows.
Look your spi time.Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreYang
Although in 9x400 ram 600MHz 6-6-6-18 single we can't do bad like you.
Can you explain why ?
yup,cherry pick, and the asus'rd version,if 602 is "easy",push more fsb to 650 is not that hard,right??or asus 'rd can push that, and andre post the results, like last time:stick:Quote:
Originally Posted by theteamaqua
I don't think 1600 exists yet but they can losen the internal latency tons to get it running that high.Quote:
Originally Posted by theteamaqua
the MCH is being pushed real hard and i doubt it would even run dual channel, infact it won't run a 1gig dimm even as the load is too high.
This 600fsb is just marketing BS for me...real performance is from 467 and upto 533 and everyone knows it
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmax_oc
P5B Deluxe in high FSB is not faster than FSB 400 because ASUS change memory low timming for high FSB.
Tonly already said in few weeks ago. Everyone knows it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hicookie
Who said P5B Deluxe cannot be over FSB 500+ in 2 month ago? So now?
Can you promise P5B-D 1.04G Retail is hard to over FSB 600 when it would be available on the market?
I will see many people can do FSB 600 when P5B Deluxe 1.04G is coming on the market.
Hey Andre, this is pretty nice. Good work and thanks for the preview. :toast:
Can you tell me, will chips that hit an FSB wall be helped at all with the C2 chip? Or did you have to try a few different chips before you hit 600fsb? My e6300 runs 510x7 stable at 1.45 but it wont boot or clockgen to 520, no matter what.
Wish people would stop bashing on this, all we ever talk aobut here is how high a boards fsb can go, then andre makes 600 and we all tell him it doesnt matter.
P.S. - A bit off topic but can anyone tell me if hte vcore/vdroop mods help getting your cpu fsb up? Thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revv23
Some 965C1 FSB is not better, such as my P5B-D 965C1 modded MCH is only up to FSB 540~550 1M.
I don't think my 965C2 is the best. Many people will be over FSB 600 when they got retail box P5B-D 1.04G 965C2.
Lol don't say so stupid words. :toast:Quote:
Originally Posted by AndreYang
6x600 memory@600 is ALWAYS quicker than 9x400 memory@600.
So : your 14.6xx second at spi 6x600MHz can't be real :slap:
Don't try to explain me life and overclocking. I'm sure that you don't know me.
I don't trust you when you say that you reached 600MHz :D
Next time, at 6x600MHz, please show us a 14,0xxs time at spi :slap:
It's better to make us accept your fakes :slapass: