Absoluteluy insane... let us know if with a better mb you can handle the FSB limit! :D
Printable View
Absoluteluy insane... let us know if with a better mb you can handle the FSB limit! :D
Incredible...
nice stuff, i'd be really interested to, really at any speed, even stock on a stock sink(i know, blasphemy :p ), see the difference between a single pi run on one core, and running 4 copies at the same time to try and see what kinda bus/bandwidth limitations the chip has. might have none, i'm thinking might be quite bad. say a 1mb pie run on all cores compared to just once instance, then again with 8mb. tbh i'm not entirely sure what kind of slowdown there is now on a ath 64 rig, seem to remember it not being to bad.
got a 3800+ x2, and a temp 3Ghz pressler in my setup that is conroe ready(cept the cpu). looking less at the numbers and more at the % drop in performance(hence any speed), of the different platforms. whats the follow up to kentsfield, its supposed to be native quad core, will that chip have the new fsb/bus system(CSI, whats that stand for anyone?).
damn your my hero that is one nice score keep up the work i want to see more
Sweet Jesus and all that. Wow now that is a fast cpu, Just what US speed junkies need, More speed!!:clap: :clap: :clap: :woot: :woot: :slobber:
With a better mobo and higher FSB, you could probably take that SP1M WR.
Glad to see you back in action! Keep the pressure on until it blows.
he'll need about 600-700mhz to get that SP1M WR
Is it possible to disable 3 cores and run a single core with 8MB cache?
Or it can only use 4MB cache from its own die?
I just noticed this was posted over on the front page of [T]ardOCP....:cool:
i want 5
right now plz :D
Have you updated to the new 1334 BIOS on the Bad Axe yet? I might be optomistic but that might cure the fsb wall on the Bad Axe. Supposedly alot of Conroe owners have reported better OC's with the new BIOS. I haven't updated mine yet but I will this afternoon when I get home. If it does help the OC it might help with this kentsfield. Just a thought.
:)
lol [T]ardOCP linked to this thread
...Must be more canned benchmarks! Kentsfield doesn't exist btw... :D :D :D
Great job Tyrou, keep up the great work.
oh my god INTEL's cpu very cool and shock
very so cool
Wow this is just awesome,thanks for posting your results.
borrow the 7900GTX SLI and MOBO from Shamino
you will get all WR !!!:D
【CPU】Intel Core 2 Duo X6800 @ 4754MHz (11 x 432MHz)
【MEM】Corsair 5400UL 2GB @ 432MHz CL3-3-3-5 2.5v
【VGA】Inno3D 7900GTX SLI @ 980/980MHz Cascade Cooled
【driver】 84.21
【Score】 15877
【SM2.0】 7241
【HDR/SM3.0】 6864
【CPU】 4061
http://resources.vr-zone.com/Shamino/15877.jpg
no it's not possible because the core has 2 dies. it's like 2 E6700 side by side
Conroe has one die with 2 cores which shares 4mb of cache. So its possible and Coolaler already did this. So one core with 4 mb = X6800@5501MHz ;) and I think its not the top :cool:Quote:
Originally Posted by roro
database update
AMD Athlon(tm) FX57 @ 4208 MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 1696 Marks
http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/9243/cpu42089kx.jpg
AMD Athlon(tm) FX62 @ 3676 MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 2787 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=329639
Intel Core Duo T2600 @ 3516 MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 2874 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=303322
Intel Pentium 965XE @ 6172 MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 3314 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=86920
AMD 2x Opteron 275 @ 2797 MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 3824 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=91145
Intel Conroe X6800 @ 5058MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 4387 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=440284
Intel XEON 5160M @ 3000MHz (Woodcrest 3.0GHz 4MB L3cache )
3DMark06 CPU Score 4570 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=501026
Intel Core 2 Quado QX6700 Kentsfield 8MB L2cache @ 3709MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 5564 Marks
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co.../3700_3D06.gif
Intel Core 2 Quado QX6700 Kentsfield 8MB L2cache @ 4104MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 6057 Marks
http://www.tyrou.net/screens/12856-3d06.png
Intel XEON 7140M @ 4438MHz (Tulsa 3.40GHz 16MB L3cache )
3DMark06 CPU Score 6632 Marks
Although Kentsfield in @ XS for a while, I still cant believe the power of 4 COREs @ 4Ghz+ HOLY ***********
now for the FSB problem - I dont see any other option than a 965 based mobo, as stated in other threads, 975X and high FSB is a real PITA ,
thenlast chance for a 975X is to watercool it ...
Wish you GOOD LUCk Tyrou :toast: