aquamark(no WR)
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/MSI975X2_1/23.gif
aquamark(no WR)
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/MSI975X2_1/23.gif
3DMark05@20563pts (no WR)
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co.../3700_3D05.gif
Code name: Conroe ? :confused:
CPUZ 1.35 will be kentsfield:DQuote:
Originally Posted by BlackX
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co...0/338/3700.gif
thanx m8 ;) but why results are so low?
They are good results ;)
@ coolaler: Do you know the models that open up for kentsfield? That they will be, the same speeds that it stops conroe,pero in 4 nuclei?:party3:
They are good results ;)
@ coolaler: Do you know the models that open up for kentsfield? That they will be, the same speeds that it stops conroe,pero in 4 nuclei?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackX
because of the clocks.
only in progs that are multithreaded you will see improvements over conroe, if you're not runnigs multhreaded progs, it will be exactly the same as a conroe @ same mhz
Incredible!
impressive results as always :)
Amazing results
holy shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiz! niice results!!!
is it plain air @ 3.7G and almost 4g screenie?
yes:)Quote:
Originally Posted by \Karting_freak
WTF!!!
Excelent Coolaler :woot:
See ya
Impressive results :toast:
wtfffffffff!!!!!!!!!!!
unfortunately the price in the 1Q 2007 will be ca.1000USD:eek:
This is the cpu to get and not a dual-core one, at least for me. The price is right for what u get, especialy in video encoding, imagine 50-70% faster than Conroe :slobber:
look at the 3DMark06 CPU Score test result
I have nothing to say:eek:
AMD Athlon(tm) FX62 @ 3676 MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 2787 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=329639
Intel Core Duo T2600 @ 3516 MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 2874 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=303322
Intel Pentium 965XE @ 6172 MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 3314 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=86920
AMD 2x Opteron 275 @ 2797 MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 3824 Marks
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=91145
Intel Conroe X6800 @ 4754MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 4061 Marks
http://resources.vr-zone.com/Shamino/15877.jpg
Intel Core 2 Duo XE6700 Kentsfield 8MB L2cache @ 3655MHz
3DMark06 CPU Score 5548 Marks
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/MSI975X2_1/14.gif
5564,That's better:DQuote:
Originally Posted by milkcafe
http://www.iamxtreme.net/coolaler/co.../3700_3D06.gif
Nice comparison!Quote:
Originally Posted by milkcafe
Nothing but a WR binge in this thread. Top effort!
the Clovertowns and the Tulsa XEON CPU will be more powerful
http://blue.ap.teacup.com/kaz622/img/1155331675.jpg
http://blue.ap.teacup.com/kaz622/img/1155331648.jpg
and here are some Xeon based system resluts
【CPU】 XEON 5160 (Woodcrest 3.0GHz)
【MEM 】 ATP DDR2-667 FB-DIMM 512MB*4
【M/B】 SuperMicro X7-DA8
【VGA】 Leadtek WinFast PX7900 GTX TDH 512MB
【driver】 ForceWare 83.91
【DirectX】 9.0c
【OS】 WindowsXP Pro SP2
【power】 Zippy-600GE typeR
3Dmark06
【Score】 6784
【SM2.0】 2595
【HDR/SM3.0】 2485
【CPU】 4432
【CPU】 XEON 7140M @stock (Tulsa 3.40GHz 16MB L3cache )
【MEM 】 Kingston DDR2-800 4*1GB
【M/B】 SuperMicro X7-DA8
【VGA】 XFX GF7800GTX512 SLI @ 690/1800
【driver】 ForceWare 91.37
【OS】 WindowsXP Pro SP1
【power】 Enermax Galaxy 1000 Watt PSU
3Dmark06
【Score】 11845
【SM2.0】 4985
【HDR/SM3.0】 4952
【CPU】 5328
【CPU】 XEON 7140M @ 4338MHz
【MEM 】 Kingston DDR2-800 4*1GB
【M/B】 SuperMicro X7-DA8
【VGA】 XFX GF7800GTX512 SLI @ 780/1968
【driver】 ForceWare 91.37
【OS】 WindowsXP Pro SP1
【power】 Enermax Galaxy 1000 Watt PSU
3Dmark06
【Score】 13452
【SM2.0】 5781
【HDR/SM3.0】5697
【CPU】 6632
Excellent results... :woot:
coolaler,would you suggest buying a xeon,instead of x6800?
tests show it is faster.