I thought the I975X always used 2T?
Printable View
I thought the I975X always used 2T?
One thing I forgot to do when I had my setup running on watercooling was test the memory for highest 1T clocks.:rolleyes:Quote:
I haven't run Sandra, but I'm sure I won't get anywhere near the bandwidth that you're getting with AM2. The C3's do seem to clock well on Intel.
Now that I see your results it looks like I need to set it up again:D
I was running at 816 3-3-3-5 1T but it may do better.
OPP
It does, Intel runs 2TQuote:
Originally Posted by Gautam
Well that would explain alot:DQuote:
Originally Posted by RyderOCZ
OPP
Oops, sorry about that.
Still, I don't think you're going to find many 2X1GB DDR2 kits that will 440 @ 3-3-3, regardless of command rate. 2X512MB, yes. But not 2GB.
So what are favorite memory sticks now? :DQuote:
Originally Posted by sierra_bound
OPP
Oh I still like the 6400C3's. But as I said earlier, the Super Talents are pretty good too. They run best at 4-4-3. With a better board, they should do 525+ with those timings.
People still bench with 2X512, but 2X1024 is where almost everyone is heading. A lot of the Japanese are now using 2GB kits. That should tell you something.
558 with the same timings using the Corsair 6400C3.Quote:
Originally Posted by sierra_bound
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...0&postcount=19
OPP
Hmmm, gonna have to try that when I get a new board. :D The problem with the AOpen board I'm using is that there are only two ratios to work with - 3:4 & 3:5. If I had 1:2, I could do more speed testing.
Have you tried Cas5? Maybe you get your C3's above 600.
Actually that's not entirely accurate. The NF4 SLI Intel chipset allows you to run 1T.Quote:
Originally Posted by RyderOCZ
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/chi...4-intel_5.html
http://www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Ha...e4intel/3.html
This motherboard here will be the time for me to try out Conroe on I think.
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&postcount=13
NVIDIA chipset, 1T action and SLI:D
OPP
Yeah, I'd like to see you run Conroe. :)
A little higher at 3-3-3 :)
http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/337/4423331wl.jpg
Is this 6400 C3 better than 8500 C5?
I will try it with conroe's set up.
:eek: Now that's what I wanna see, nice tight timings. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by sierra_bound
Thanks. Not sure how this memory will do with Conroe. I'll find out soon. ;)
@Dumo - I haven't tried the 8500C5's, so I don't know if they're better.
is it these ram u guys are talking about ? http://edbpriser.dk/Listprices.asp?ID=206421
Yup, that's the RAM. :)
I like the 6400C3 better. The 8500C5 can't go high with tight timings compared to the 6400C3. The 8500C5 is meant more for highest possable frequency but with loose timings.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumo
OPP
I also like the C3 better than the 8500 part. Ive hit 460 1:1 3-3-3-9
Booting at 433FSB 1:1, best for sandra scores with the exception the Conroe scores no where near what AM2 or Presler does.
Yep, the C3s are pretty nice :D
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1.../1020-3434.gif
Is this 6400c3 capable of 4-3-2-* 3-3-2-*? (Or something with a 2 :p: )
sierra_bound and Oppainter, which revision are these sticks? Both Rev1.1?
Do you have any idea on the used chips? I guess D9GKX, could that be right?
My modules are v1.1. I think most out there are the same since the RAM is fairly new. I believe the modules use highly-binned Micron Rev. D chips. This explains in part why the RAM is so expensive.
I'm wondering about a "2" also.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vassili
I have only ran my sticks on AM2 and the Foxconn mobo I have doesn't even have any 2s in it. 3 is the lowest the mobo offers.
OPP