32m Low Clock Challenge

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

03-30-2006, 06:38 AM
Dani

Quote:

Originally Posted by RAMMIE

Copy-wazza seems to give a big boost.

How big file did you copy to other partition?
..or from other partition:confused:
03-30-2006, 04:41 PM
RAMMIE

3000 Mb
03-30-2006, 05:24 PM
RAMMIE

Under 24 class.

http://webpages.charter.net/mlanter/24.png
03-30-2006, 06:25 PM
RAMMIE

Under 25
Can't beat stephen in under 20.Think my chip will do it,but don't have good enough cooling.Guess I have to go after P Royal and Intel

http://webpages.charter.net/mlanter/25.png
03-31-2006, 04:25 AM
before

Quote:

Originally Posted by RAMMIE

Copy-wazza seems to give a big boost.

'Copy-wazza' ?? What's that? ;)

Congrats on your times; nice work! :toast:
04-14-2006, 08:40 PM
dinos22

got some nice TCCD RAM to play with and just did a nice time for sub-24m

sub-24m 32M at 2960MHz :rocker:

http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/8...tertimings.jpg
04-14-2006, 11:39 PM
before

Well done dinos :toast:
04-15-2006, 03:59 AM
Dani

- some update @ 3G with 2x512mb BH-5

http://koti.mbnet.fi/dani69/DFI%20nF...23m39.469s.gif
05-06-2006, 02:33 PM
Moonman

Sub 24min @ 2960MHz.
http://img422.imageshack.us/img422/6684/spi231vd.jpg
05-06-2006, 04:01 PM
coop

Some great times and excellent tuning.
05-06-2006, 04:20 PM
Moonman

http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/5...i2329444lu.jpg

And last update before I go to bed. :sonic:

EDIT: Sorry coop for double post, but I couldn't refuse to try again. :)
05-06-2006, 05:38 PM
coop

With a score like that you would not have been able to sleep if you didn't post it anyway. Nice job.
05-07-2006, 03:11 AM
Moonman

This one was a little tougher, but I think I was a bit lucky.
http://img55.imageshack.us/img55/760...2msub236oe.jpg

EDIT: Lowered MAL and RP helped. :)
http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/1...ub23min5oy.jpg
05-16-2006, 02:24 PM
RAMMIE

Under 23

http://webpages.charter.net/mlanter/3109.png
05-17-2006, 02:55 PM
before

Hey Rammie & Moonman; very impressive runs guys! :D
05-20-2006, 03:03 AM
before

Here's my contribution for the 19mins low clock challenge;)

http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/2...32m37014co.jpg
05-20-2006, 11:50 AM
coop

Nice job before, your setup is working well. Do you have enough processors?
06-01-2006, 12:33 PM
eva2000

how's this @2980Mhz!

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL...3min58s_tn.png
06-08-2006, 05:56 PM
RAMMIE

Under 24
This might be an exercise in futility with the K-A Conroe scores,but it's what I have.

http://webpages.charter.net/mlanter/2943.png
06-08-2006, 06:11 PM
proth

maybe just divide mine by 2
http://img72.imageshack.us/img72/2317/sp3219409zq.jpg
06-08-2006, 06:12 PM
proth

...
06-08-2006, 06:19 PM
Moonman

Good work there RAMMIE.
I think I'll have to redo my times. :D
06-08-2006, 06:56 PM
wwwww

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/6804/32m2si.jpg

2.9Ghz - 19 minutes...
I win :P

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vapor

Anybody who runs 32M has too much time ;)

I'm not even joking....

Interesting competition idea though.....care to adapt it to 4M?

I wish I had that ol' screenshot of my dothan erroring after loop 23. :P

oh wait - I do http://img497.imageshack.us/img497/9388/omfg3oq.png
06-08-2006, 07:03 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by wwwww

http://img505.imageshack.us/img505/6804/32m2si.jpg

2.9Ghz - 19 minutes...
I win :P

I wish I had that ol' screenshot of my dothan erroring after loop 24. :P

Looks like I'll have to make a run with this yonah :D

http://img349.imageshack.us/img349/6186/cpu39153jn.jpg
06-10-2006, 06:20 AM
RAMMIE

http://webpages.charter.net/mlanter/2938.png
06-10-2006, 06:24 AM
eva2000

hehe

dual 32M time

@16x216HTT = 3456Mhz
DDR466 upclock
2x 512MB OCZ PC3200 Gold UTT BH-5 @246mhz 2-2-2-5 at 3.48v

click image for full screenie

http://www.fileshosts.com/DFI/NF4_SL..._22m13s_tn.png
06-11-2006, 09:31 AM
Highland3r

http://82.110.105.22/drunken-student.../yonah_32m.JPG

Need to work out why this chips now bugging at 235 (same chip as wwwww did his run with...)
06-14-2006, 08:58 PM
coop

@Rammie, updated..thanks.
@eva2000, nice clock there I'm opening a dual core catagory.
@Highland3r, welcome and nice job. (crap, I had to d-check I thought I wrote it down wrong!!)
**If I left something out, pm me. I'll correct or update.
06-15-2006, 12:11 AM
s7e9h3n

:D Yes, I know...it's a crappy result for that speed, but I was just happy that it finished...:p:

http://img114.imageshack.us/img114/2...5x1332m0yd.jpg
06-15-2006, 01:16 AM
CapFTP

is that good for 20.xxx section ?

http://forum.overclocklab.net/images...32M_20m34s.JPG
06-15-2006, 08:49 PM
coop

@CapFTP, it certainly is.
Nice stephen, sub 16m cat. added.
06-15-2006, 10:07 PM
dinos22

this thread makes no sense coop...........if you look at the first page the info is irrelevant as you've got different manufacturers' CPUs and models with only MHz listed...........i think you need to start making distinctions
06-15-2006, 11:02 PM
CapFTP

Quote:

Originally Posted by coop

@CapFTP, it certainly is.
Nice stephen, sub 16m cat. added.

just correct my time please....it's 20:34 not 20.54..

:D:D

THnx
06-16-2006, 10:15 AM
coop

@dinos22, "*P" is for Intel...there was not so many at the begining.
@CapFTP, done sorry. I like that processor. Nice time in hwbot for 1m.
06-16-2006, 11:50 AM
CapFTP

Quote:

Originally Posted by coop

@dinos22, "*P" is for Intel...there was not so many at the begining.
@CapFTP, done sorry. I like that processor. Nice time in hwbot for 1m.

LOL...i thought I could take 2nd place..but it's ordered by frequency...LOL

well....more or less is FOR SALE...if really like it..:toast:
06-16-2006, 05:23 PM
RAMMIE

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=205
06-17-2006, 06:00 AM
coop

20.XX [IMG]http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/501/p10500747uw.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/3...00688fy.th.jpg[/IMG]
06-25-2006, 11:06 AM
Asazman

interesting change on things..very interesting...
06-25-2006, 11:10 AM
Highland3r

http://82.110.105.22/drunken-student...h/32m_1936.JPG

Bit quicker :D
08-25-2006, 05:41 PM
dinos22

oh the good old 32M challenge thread.................this has to be the best idea of all here

here's my allendale sub 14m time (it's not really fair against AMD maybe we should start a new thread)

http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/133...7187swmqn3.jpg
08-27-2006, 02:22 AM
eva2000

yup 13min 56s at 3600mhz

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...6s422ms_tn.png
08-27-2006, 09:28 AM
bachus_anonym

oh, I totally forgot about this one! I got my E6600/P5B Dx on Friday and will join you guys for "below 14m" challenge. I'm kind of stuck with stock cooler for now, and it maxes my C2D at 3.6GHz, 32M stable... I will update this post tonight with circa 3.52-3.55GHz screen :D

EDIT:

Quote:

I will update this post tonight with circa 3.52-3.55GHz screen :D

Ok, I lied... :lol:

Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 377x9=3392Mhz, Corsair 6400C3 @ DDR2-1130 5-3-4-4.0 --> 13:57.485
vdimm: 2.45v (BIOS) --> 2.47v (DMM)
:toast:
08-27-2006, 03:13 PM
dinos22

i think i wet my pants :eek:
08-27-2006, 03:16 PM
M.Beier

Below 14min, thats 3500mhz or something? :D

Givin' it a shot after the second one... - Just gonna make a dual 32M.

EDIT:
Damnit Bachus, now your givin' us a hell of a time competing.. :|
08-27-2006, 03:22 PM
eva2000

Nice bachus better ram + high vdimm = :cool: pi times :D
08-27-2006, 03:32 PM
M.Beier

Realtime, affinity, and, are you sure you performed copy-waza correctly? - I didnt and wondered what the hell... Then I asked the master himself (Kyosen), and now it helps quite a bit..

Are you using 500mhz as well? ;)

EDIT:
Win2k3 was better due memtweaks, right? - But this aint A64, so I actually think winXP will do slightly better...
08-27-2006, 07:30 PM
eva2000

my latest

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...3min07s_tn.png
08-28-2006, 09:29 AM
Gautam

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

yup 13min 56s at 3600mhz

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...6s422ms_tn.png

There's no way I can match Bachus with the screwiness of the board/mem combo, but, perhaps 1:1 isn't that much worse than 4:5 when tuned properly? :p:

I wish I could try to compare your second one but my board starts getting unstable at 410MHz FSB. :cry:
08-29-2006, 10:45 PM
eva2000

bah key to your times is tRD = 5 ;)

anyway new cpus are fun :D

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...in41s671ms.png
08-30-2006, 05:25 AM
Gautam

tRD 5 is really worth that much eh?

I was having a feeling it perhaps was the "Standard" memory parameter?

That's another thing to keep in mind, if running 4:5 takes so much loosening, is it really worth it?

Enjoy the extra multi. :p:
08-30-2006, 05:39 AM
eva2000

tRD loosened from 6 to 7 at same clocks can slow 32M times by 4-10 seconds depending on cpu and mem clocks from the little testing i done... i still can't even get tRD = 5 to run stably though i think you need >2.4v vdimm and/or Micron D9 or memory that runs tighter latencies...
08-30-2006, 05:53 AM
Gautam

Hehe, try running a 1:2 divider, I was dumb not to take a full CPU-Z shot of this, but take my word for it, this was at 538MHz...

http://mysite.verizon.net/gautamb/b.JPG

Now I'm messing with 2:3 because of that time you just put up, 5 = instant freeze. tRD is somehow intrinsically tied to the divider. Seems like you can run it at 5 1:2, 6 2:3 but generally only 7 4:5.

Aren't your mems D9GMH?
08-30-2006, 06:05 AM
eva2000

yeah mine are D9GMH.. but they aren't the same

interesting but doesn't explain your 1:1 tRD = 5 i think it might be memory module related or P5W DH bios ??? or vdimm used heh

what vdimm did you use for 400mhz 1:1 tRD = 5 with 3-3-3-8 ?
08-30-2006, 06:24 AM
Gautam

You're right I guess it doesn't explain why I can do 5 at 1:1.

Always 2.4v, BIOS 701, Team Group PC2 5300. Btw I can't get them to 32M even at 533MHz 2:3. :-/ So they aren't anything special.

It seems pretty clear to me though that I'm loosing speed each time I go down a divider. 1:2 seems to be the easiest by far. Some of this stuff has got to do with the SPD tables. I can't do 4:5 no matter what past 480, tried tRFC as high as 45 and tRD 7. :S But you have no problem even with low tRFC.
08-30-2006, 06:48 AM
eva2000

sounds like your memory is binned for tight timings hence tRD = 5 mine are higher clocks at looser timings i.e. i'm at 540-542mhz 4-4-4-8 at 2.4v and 552mhz 5-5-5-5 at 2.4v right now hehe
08-30-2006, 06:54 AM
Gautam

I gain 0 MHz going from 4-4-4 to 5-5-5. :shrug: I think its more than binning though...there are probably internal parameters in the SPD tables that we can't control at play here.
08-30-2006, 07:19 AM
eva2000

yeah probable

How's this for 2x1GB Gskill PC6400PHU2 HZ Micron D9GMH 0629 batch

2:3

10x360fsb 2:3 540mhz 4-4-4-8 at 2.4v = PC2-8640

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...in41s671ms.png

loosen memory timings and managed to pull off 10x368fsb 2:3 552mhz 5-5-5-5 at 2.4v = PC2-8832 memory :D

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...7ms_memset.png
08-30-2006, 07:32 AM
VictorWang

this one:
P5WDH-Deluxe 1101
Team DDR2_1000 1G*2 Victor ED
Intel Stock Cooler
zippy psl-6701p
ambient=26c

Conroe E6700es B2 stepping @ 3734mhz
http://vic.expreview.com/attachment/1156690515.jpg
09-01-2006, 12:03 AM
eva2000

woah crazy 560mhz 4-4-3-1 timings!
09-01-2006, 12:07 AM
dinos22

eva your and my ram can do the same but we just need more vdimm

incidentaly what vdimm was that at :)
09-01-2006, 12:16 AM
eva2000

yeah i know more vdimm is needed hehe
09-05-2006, 12:04 AM
SLi_dog

How's this one?

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n..._32M-13m23.png
09-05-2006, 03:02 PM
IluvIntel

SLi Dog, does that count as low clock speed @ 3788Mhz for conroe in this thread ?
09-05-2006, 06:55 PM
SLi_dog

Quote:

Originally Posted by IluvIntel

SLi Dog, does that count as low clock speed @ 3788Mhz for conroe in this thread ?

Probably not. My bad :slapass: .
It's on the stock Intel HSF though, that's low to me :D .

Edit: Hey, RodneyJM :)
09-06-2006, 12:24 AM
IluvIntel

Quote:

Originally Posted by SLi_dog

Probably not. My bad :slapass: .
It's on the stock Intel HSF though, that's low to me :D .

Edit: Hey, RodneyJM :)

Yoohhh ! whats hapen'in my man ! :D
Nice to see a fellow i4memorian on this wonderful forum.. :toast:

My turn.

http://img147.imageshack.us/img147/5...pi15runhi2.jpg
09-06-2006, 12:31 AM
dinos22

i think you guys are both missing the point

the point is to run xxM 5xS runs at lowest possible MHz
09-06-2006, 01:06 AM
longsiew

Am I eligible???

around 19min, tho=(

http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/6...pi32milkb1.jpg
09-06-2006, 01:16 AM
dinos22

you should be doing a sub19 minute times NOT just over 19m times

also it's pretty slow

you should be able to do it around 2550MHz with an Allendale

i did this run while testing ram recently to give you an idea
http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/6...superpido9.jpg
09-09-2006, 11:44 AM
eva2000

Lowest clocked cpu on hwbot top 10 and non-X6800 cpu too

E6700 QPGA B1 @4416Mhz at 1.7 bios set = 1.648-1.656v vcore
2x1GB Gskill PC6400PHU2 2GBHZ Micron D9GMH @552Mhz 4-4-4-4 at 2.51v (max pencil modded vdimm).

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W..._validated.png

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...in34s422ms.png

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...in34s422ms.png
09-09-2006, 12:31 PM
Gautam

It's a pleasure to see you on subzero cooling. :woot:
09-09-2006, 07:19 PM
bachus_anonym

Since some of you guys are still missing the point of this thread, here's a valid submission :D :banana:

Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 402x9=3618Mhz, Corsair 6400C3 @ DDR2-1206 8-4-4-4.0 --> 12:59.922
vdimm: 2.45v (BIOS) --> 2.47v LOAD (DMM)
vcore: 1.48v (BIOS) --> 1.46v LOAD (DMM)
ASUS P5B Deluxe, not yet modded at all
Still on Intel stock cooler

I just barely made it into 12:xx category, which IS the goal to achieve at the LOWEST possible CPU clock.
09-09-2006, 07:31 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by bachus_anonym

Since some of you guys are still missing the point of this thread, here's a valid submission :D :banana:

Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 402x9=3618Mhz, Corsair 6400C3 @ DDR2-1206 8-4-4-4.0 --> 12:59.922
vdimm: 2.45v (BIOS) --> 2.47v LOAD (DMM)
vcore: 1.48v (BIOS) --> 1.46v LOAD (DMM)
ASUS P5B Deluxe, not yet modded at all
Still on Intel stock cooler

I just barely made it into 12:xx category, which IS the goal to achieve at the LOWEST possible CPU clock.

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: i told you guys 3.6GHz sub-13 is doable :toast: :toast: :toast: :toast:

shame coop isn't updating any more >>> that's a killer time man
09-09-2006, 09:56 PM
eva2000

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gautam

It's a pleasure to see you on subzero cooling. :woot:

thanks already smashed that time at same exact clocks and then smashed it a few more times.. :D

bachus, crazy mem clocks there :D
09-09-2006, 10:21 PM
sierra_bound

This is my contribution:

P5B Deluxe + E6400

http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/3...32m3302ay4.jpg

And yes, the CPU will run much higher.:D
09-10-2006, 08:00 AM
bachus_anonym

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

i told you guys 3.6GHz sub-13 is doable

shame coop isn't updating any more >>> that's a killer time man

I think that's my "balls to the wall" effort. I tried few more times and I just can't make it below 13m at 3.6GHz. I think, that might be as good as it gets :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by eva2000

bachus, crazy mem clocks there :D

Freakish set, I know :lol: It maxes out 16M @ 608-610 8-4-4-4.0, 2.45v

@sierra_bound,

Glad you joined us here, man! That's a nice one for 2MB... Show us what you got with E6600! :D
:toast:
09-11-2006, 09:27 AM
eva2000

bachus that mem clock is really doing my head in hehe and at such low vdimm!

here's my latest
http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...9s750ms_tn.png

http://fileshosts.com/intel/Asus/P5W...5s172ms_tn.png
09-11-2006, 08:28 PM
coop

Updated.. notify me about corrections. Nice work everyone and thanks for patience.
09-11-2006, 08:39 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by coop

Updated.. notify me about corrections. Nice work everyone and thanks for patience.

good to see dude

:toast: :toast:
09-16-2006, 03:24 AM
SLi_dog

This is an old run from a face off with eva2000 in which he ended up wiping the floor with me :). I was using a basically untweaked OS so I'm sure I could go faster now ;)

http://i108.photobucket.com/albums/n...Pi32M11m35.png
09-16-2006, 06:02 AM
alpha0ne

13m 54.297s @ below 3.6GHz :)

http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b2...ne/32M3596.jpg
09-16-2006, 06:27 AM
afireinside

Man I've been trying for days to get into 13:5x with 400*9 1:1 but I just can't do it :( Even with much more aggressive mem times than OPB and bachus and now 2gb ram. Only got a 6 sec boost from that. Need to Vdimm mod my board.
09-18-2006, 12:30 PM
camouflage

:D Here's another one:

http://img74.imageshack.us/img74/4303/sp32m36ghzss3.jpg

E6600-Corsair XMS2 8500 2x1GB-P5WDG2-WS PRO-WC setup

:toast:
09-22-2006, 07:57 AM
TaPaKaH

here are some mine 32M results

1st was made while OCing E6400 under DI @ 4340MHz : 12:05.672s
http://images.people.overclockers.ru/89334.png
2nd is testing X6800ES under DI @ 4601MHz : 11:24.531s
http://images.people.overclockers.ru/90247.png
09-25-2006, 06:06 AM
funkflix

Hey!

What is a good 32M time for a E6400 with 3600MHz? I'm at 15m 19s atm. :)
10-02-2006, 10:38 PM
corvus_corax

13m 26.047s @ 3.6GHz
Just a slightly tweaked system and using sabinu's tweak (pseudo-minimize tweak, that explains SPi right align :p: Thanks man :thumbsup: ).
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...513m26047s.png

Edit: A better shot ;)

Well, here is before edit :p:
13m 29.078s Monitor
10-02-2006, 11:56 PM
alpha0ne

Quote:

Originally Posted by corvus_corax

13m 29.078s @ 3.6GHz[/url]
Just a slightly tweaked system and using sabinu's tweak (pseudo-minimize tweak, that explains SPi right align :p: Thanks man :thumbsup: ).

Brilliant time :clap: :toast:

Care to explain these pseudo-minimize tweak, that explains SPi right align ??? :eek:
10-03-2006, 10:07 AM
corvus_corax

Quote:

Originally Posted by alpha0ne

Brilliant time :clap: :toast:

Care to explain these pseudo-minimize tweak, that explains SPi right align ??? :eek:

Thanks alpha0ne :)
About pseudo-minimize, here sabinus explains the tweak:

Quote:

Originally Posted by sabinus

It's been a while since last tweaks were posted here.
Now I want to tell about one tweak that did help. It doesn't compare to copy-waza in terms of time gain but it gave me around ~0.1" for 1 MB SuperPI runs. Because of the nature of this tweak I think it is more helpful to 1 MB / 2MB runs then for 32 MB runs.
I call this tweak: pseudo-minimize because it resembles to minimize but it's not the same. It goes like this:

When all other tweaks are done (including realtime priority and copy-waza) and you are ready to launch SuperPI 1MB, then drag the bottom-right corner of the SuperPI window towards the upper-left corner untill the only thing left visible remains the small title bar of the window.

Then use the keyboard to launch SuperPI with the combination ALT+C then select the desired run (1MB, 2MB etc) with either the keyboard or mouse, then hit Enter (or click OK).

Finally, when the "PI calculation done!" message appears you should put the mouse pointer over the TaskBar, click the right button and select "Tile Windows Vertically" to see the whole SuperPI window and do the screeny fest ;)

Useful for 32M too :)
10-03-2006, 02:36 PM
dinos22

you are still missing the point people

i don't know how many times it needs to be repeated..............the idea is to get into the sub 13m/14m/15m etc times with lowest possible CPU MHz

so when you submit your time for sub 13m run the idea is to get to score around 12m 55-59.99s times with lowest possible CPU MHz.......for corvus that would mean raising the CPU MHz to lower the times from 13m 29s to JUST UNDER 13m
10-03-2006, 03:25 PM
funkflix

Sorry for missing the topic again, but maybe anyone of u guys can tell me, why my 32M times that bad?!

I tried Win2k3/WinXP with realtime and without and different ramclocks, both on clean windows. Normally i should go easy into the 13min imho, even without tweaked windows, but i just can get around 14min..

http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/7992/32langsamez7.jpg

Vcore 1,53V
Vdimm 2,4V

Any ideas? :toast:
10-03-2006, 08:04 PM
alpha0ne

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

you are still missing the point people

i don't know how many times it needs to be repeated..............the idea is to get into the sub 13m/14m/15m etc times with lowest possible CPU MHz

so when you submit your time for sub 13m run the idea is to get to score around 12m 55-59.99s times with lowest possible CPU MHz.......for corvus that would mean raising the CPU MHz to lower the times from 13m 29s to JUST UNDER 13m

Hehehe thanks for bringing that up again dinos, ppl were posting +4GHz runs :slapass: :rolleyes:
10-03-2006, 08:53 PM
corvus_corax

@dinos: OK, i see, thanks for clarify. I saw just the last posts, so, i post my time :D. I'm gonna work in sub-13 ;) .

Edit: i'm eating the words with this new keyboard LOL
10-03-2006, 09:03 PM
alpha0ne

Quote:

Originally Posted by corvus_corax

@dinos: OK, i see, thanks for clarify. I saw just the last posts, so, i post my time :D. I gonna work on sub-13 ;) .

Hehe good luck, sub 13 @ under 3.60GHz will be very hard :fact: :)
10-03-2006, 09:10 PM
corvus_corax

Indeed alpha0ne
I'll need a higher freq :p: or to mod my P5B for vdimm higher and maybe running 2:3 (DDR2 1200MHz 4-4-4) cuz with 2.45V i can't get that.
10-03-2006, 09:32 PM
alpha0ne

Yes the only way would be using 2:3 with very tight timings and every tweak in the book :D ;)
10-03-2006, 11:02 PM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by funkflix

Sorry for missing the topic again, but maybe anyone of u guys can tell me, why my 32M times that bad?!

I tried Win2k3/WinXP with realtime and without and different ramclocks, both on clean windows. Normally i should go easy into the 13min imho, even without tweaked windows, but i just can get around 14min..

http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/7992/32langsamez7

Vcore 1,53V
Vdimm 2,4V

Any ideas? :toast:

maybe create a new thread

just from initial things i'd say it's the 1333 that's hurting you badly there
10-04-2006, 03:14 AM
funkflix

Quote:

Originally Posted by dinos22

maybe create a new thread

just from initial things i'd say it's the 1333 that's hurting you badly there

I'm not the guy who is creating new threads all the time. It's even more realistic to get fast and good help into here. ;)

Anyway, thx or ur answer, but look at bachus results a few pages before, he had 12min 59s with 3600MHz!? U think the strap is that important for 32M, that i can not even hit this time with + 4000MHz? :(
10-04-2006, 03:31 AM
Viss

Quote:

Originally Posted by funkflix

U think the strap is that important for 32M, that i can not even hit this time with + 4000MHz? :(

This is what i get at 3800 untweaked OS. Booted at 400 and CG up to 423. Same board/bios your using. Stil very slow though compared to the 13 min at 3.6 :D

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...M400-422CG.jpg
10-04-2006, 03:37 AM
funkflix

Quote:

Originally Posted by loc.o

This is what i get at 3800 untweaked OS. Booted at 400 and CG up to 423. Same board/bios your using. Stil very slow though compared to the 13 min at 3.6 :D

Thx for doing this run man! I will test it with the same settings u used.. we will see. :)
10-04-2006, 05:54 AM
dinos22

Quote:

Originally Posted by funkflix

I'm not the guy who is creating new threads all the time. It's even more realistic to get fast and good help into here. ;)

Anyway, thx or ur answer, but look at bachus results a few pages before, he had 12min 59s with 3600MHz!? U think the strap is that important for 32M, that i can not even hit this time with + 4000MHz? :(

BA was on the FAST strap 1066 ;)
10-04-2006, 06:01 AM
funkflix

I'm getting 15min 07sec if i boot with 399MHz and go to 423MHz into win, as loc.o did.. Should be the 1066 Strap too? I think it is my B5 or the 2x512MB holding me back, dunno..

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:08 AM.

XtremeSystems