The World Record Database

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-11-2005, 12:39 PM
NiCKE^

Thanks man for the contribution! I've updated all now :)
06-12-2005, 10:39 AM
Unseen

a poor celeron under rotary power this weekend in my house...

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=22902
http://img121.echo.cx/img121/2930/hp...ikri4oo.th.jpg

~92% oc :)
06-12-2005, 10:43 AM
NiCKE^

Will add...
06-12-2005, 12:41 PM
cpulloverclock

I think to get 3600MHz soon :)

3000+ (Venice): cpulloverclock - 3460.2Mhz http://cpull.free.fr/Overclocking/Sc...ce-3460MHz.jpg
06-12-2005, 01:03 PM
NiCKE^

Can I ask why you didn't use 1.29 cpulloverclock?
06-12-2005, 01:07 PM
nutcase

1 Attachment(s)

ok.. I am resubmitting for DDR2 bandwidth. (now 10,296)..

somebody thinks it is a bug, But that would not explain why Everest mem reads also are high and why my Spi 1M scores went way down..

appears this ram is using one of the new Burst modes implememted into DDR2.

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=22029
06-12-2005, 01:17 PM
NiCKE^

Added both now ;)
06-12-2005, 01:26 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

Can I ask why you didn't use 1.29 cpulloverclock?

cuz I didnt have internet on this computer
I installed a proxy and now it's ok
I'll dl it tomorrow :)

next records with 1.29
06-12-2005, 01:28 PM
NiCKE^

Well I believe you and I see you as a honest man who won't lie about his own achievements so I added it.
I will probably get some DI on my 3000+ soon also :D
06-12-2005, 01:31 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by hag6br

ok.. I am resubmitting for DDR2 bandwidth. (now 10,296)..

somebody thinks it is a bug, But that would not explain why Everest mem reads also are high and why my Spi 1M scores went way down..

appears this ram is using one of the new Burst modes implememted into DDR2.

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=22029

try your mem in another mb cuz I dont believe that's the real score
06-12-2005, 01:35 PM
nutcase

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

try your mem in another mb cuz I dont believe that's the real score

Been used in 2 different P5wd2's and both score about the same..

Only other DDR2 Mobo I have is a Dfi 915P-T2, which is a lousy Overclocker..
06-12-2005, 01:36 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by hag6br

Been used in 2 different P5wd2's and both score about the same..

Only other DDR2 Mobo I have is a Dfi 915P-T2, which is a lousy Overclocker..

I mean on an ABIt or other
06-12-2005, 01:39 PM
nutcase

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

I mean on an ABIt or other

you don't want to know what I think of Abit.. The Last Abit Mobo I bought is now hanging on the wall in 2 pieces...
06-12-2005, 01:41 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by hag6br

you don't want to know what I think of Abit.. The Last Abit Mobo I bought is now hanging on the wall in 2 pieces...

but to confirm your record...
06-12-2005, 01:47 PM
NiCKE^

It might be hard to use a board that doesn't oc as well as the other?
06-12-2005, 02:11 PM
nutcase

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

but to confirm your record...

first thing.. The Stilt used the P5wd2 also for his records, But why are you not questioning his? Only thing different is he used a 660 and Cosair 5400UL.

next, I have some OCZ PC2-5400 Gold laying around. even though it will not hold as tight of timings as this stuff, I will try it and see how it does..

I just cannot see wating money just to confirm a record. I have enough Money tied up for when my Amd X2 core gets here..
06-12-2005, 02:14 PM
Mathias-K

Couldn't other means than exchanging motherboards be used to determine the validity of this WR? Couldn't omparing SuperPI- or '01-results at almost equal settings tell us something about how his mem's running?

Because surely his memory can't be at WR-speeds in one test and really poor in another mem-intensive-test, or could they? :S
06-13-2005, 11:33 AM
esdee

New WR 3500+ Venice.

My 3500+ Venice
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=23069

r507 prommie cooled
Max Bench superPI @ 3360 @ 24sec SuperPI http://www.thelab.gr/attachment.php?s=&postid=243060

more better results soon!
06-13-2005, 12:18 PM
NiCKE^

Updated....
Great results esdee!
06-13-2005, 12:35 PM
Unseen

@nicke^ bro esdee have venice not winchester :)
06-13-2005, 12:39 PM
NiCKE^

Think I need to get my eyes checked.... ;)
06-13-2005, 12:47 PM
micdoc

well done esdee :banana:
06-13-2005, 01:02 PM
esdee

thanks guys! those numbers where with a simple r507 prommie
as soon as my new Evaps (hurry up unseen) arrive ill finish my r410 unit for more action
06-13-2005, 01:11 PM
cpulloverclock

3000+ (Venice): cpulloverclock - 3473.9MHz http://cpull.free.fr/Overclocking/Sc...ce-3474MHz.jpg

my new dod arrives in a few days and cp of 4000W + a big condenser

single stage :D

http://112233445566.free.fr/ocing%20lan/Photo%20022.jpg
06-13-2005, 01:14 PM
NiCKE^

Looks cool, what temps can you get with that cpulloverclock?
06-13-2005, 01:22 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

Looks cool, what temps can you get with that cpulloverclock?

dfi indicates -1 +1°C at 1.8v in bios

my dfi is very bad to monitore
06-13-2005, 01:27 PM
esdee

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

3000+ (Venice): cpulloverclock - 3473.9MHz http://cpull.free.fr/Overclocking/Sc...ce-3474MHz.jpg

my new dod arrives in a few days and cp of 4000W + a big condenser

single stage :D

http://112233445566.free.fr/ocing%20lan/Photo%20022.jpg

amazing chip cpulloverclock, good luck with your new hardware!
06-13-2005, 01:30 PM
NiCKE^

Yepp it's a very good chip he got there.
I'm making the WR Website atm and I'm thinking about adding PiFast and CPUMark99 and CPUMark2 to it and also PCMARK04 and might Aquamark?
06-13-2005, 01:32 PM
esdee

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

Yepp it's a very good chip he got there.
I'm making the WR Website atm and I'm thinking about adding PiFast and CPUMark99 and CPUMark2 to it and also PCMARK04 and might Aquamark?

nicke^ it would be a great site if you can keep it updated!
06-13-2005, 01:40 PM
NiCKE^

If you keep me posted with your new wrs I can't see why it wouldn't work out well ;)
06-13-2005, 01:53 PM
esdee

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

If you keep me posted with your new wrs I can't see why it wouldn't work out well ;)

indeed :D
06-13-2005, 02:06 PM
NiCKE^

Think most of it is done now. I made a easy site so it's not anything advanced :D

http://web.telia.com/~u97102906/OC-Records/
Will look like that ;)
06-14-2005, 01:44 AM
cpulloverclock

I get a screen at 3487MHz, soon 3501MHz with the same dod waiting my new, 3600+ and more :)

spi 1M at 3303MHz = 25.156 with a 3000+ Venice
cpumark at 3317MHz = 402 with a 3000+ Venice

I'll post the screen in 10-11 hours :)
06-14-2005, 02:23 AM
Sesto Sento

great cpuoverclock ;) keep the good work. We want to see 3.5/3.6 ;) ehhehe
06-14-2005, 01:23 PM
cpulloverclock

3000+ (Venice): cpulloverclock - 3487.6Mhz http://cpull.free.fr/Overclocking/Sc...ce-3487MHz.jpg
06-14-2005, 01:32 PM
NiCKE^

Updated the first post on the forums now and the website with your score cpulloverclock ;)
06-14-2005, 01:48 PM
cpulloverclock

ok

my dod is dead --> cp at 100-150°C during 5h
06-14-2005, 01:53 PM
NiCKE^

Too bad, are you going to get a new?
06-14-2005, 01:58 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

Too bad, are you going to get a new?

yes but I dont know when..

july I think
06-14-2005, 02:05 PM
[XC] moddolicous

cpulloverclock, do u have ay screenies of your BH-5 running 302 2-2-2-5??? I think that would also be a world record.
06-14-2005, 02:20 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by moddolicous

cpulloverclock, do u have ay screenies of your BH-5 running 302 2-2-2-5??? I think that would also be a world record.

http://cpull.free.fr/Overclocking/Ra...loverclock.jpg
06-14-2005, 02:57 PM
NiCKE^

Then I might borrow the record from you if I get a succefully DI run ;)
06-14-2005, 03:22 PM
[XC] moddolicous

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

http://cpull.free.fr/Overclocking/Ra...loverclock.jpg

Thats insane cpulloverclock. That is the record for 2-2-2-5 (as far as I know). Is that benchable @ like 295?
06-14-2005, 06:50 PM
s7e9h3n

Quote:

Originally Posted by moddolicous

Thats insane cpulloverclock. That is the record for 2-2-2-5 (as far as I know). Is that benchable @ like 295?

Leave it up to cpulloverclock to pull off the unthinkable....WOW!..... :toast:
06-14-2005, 08:37 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

Then I might borrow the record from you if I get a succefully DI run ;)

but my 3000+ will be tested at -85°C after a dod with -40 -60

I hope 3750MHz
06-14-2005, 08:38 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by moddolicous

Thats insane cpulloverclock. That is the record for 2-2-2-5 (as far as I know). Is that benchable @ like 295?

at 291 1.5-2-2-5
06-15-2005, 01:22 AM
NiCKE^

Quote:

Originally Posted by cpulloverclock

but my 3000+ will be tested at -85°C after a dod with -40 -60

I hope 3750MHz

We will see what I can do ;)
06-15-2005, 11:29 AM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

We will see what I can do ;)

soon a new dod with around -30 -40C cpu and a cascade voluntarily limited at -85C for Venice's and San Diego's
06-15-2005, 12:52 PM
NiCKE^

Hope you will get a high score with the cascade.
06-15-2005, 01:06 PM
cpulloverclock

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

Hope you will get a high score with the cascade.

I hope that will boot :D
06-15-2005, 01:50 PM
NiCKE^

Of course it will boot ;) I wish you the best luck.
06-16-2005, 03:09 AM
Mathias-K

Since there aren't any AMD SuperPI records, i think Bachus' new SD 3700+ scores come somewhat close and deserve some attention!

AMD:
1M: bachus_anonym - 24.641s http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...pi1M_24641.png
8M: bachus_anonym - 4m 34.531s http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...gbachus_anonym
16M: bachus_anonym - 10m 2.515s http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...6M_1002515.png
32M: bachus_anonym - 21m 55.218s http://www.clockmehigh.com/cooler/sc...2M_2155218.png

Please submit the results, if you have seen FX55's or other AMD processors score better. (or if i screwed up submitting these :))
06-16-2005, 07:41 AM
NiCKE^

I will submit them after I've polished my new DI Container with some autosol ;)
06-17-2005, 09:26 AM
esdee

Same Setup, new WR

Venice 3500+ @ 3504.71 @ r507 prommie
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=23644
06-17-2005, 11:04 AM
NiCKE^

Nice, will update..
06-18-2005, 01:52 AM
benktlottie

Hi all,

My first post here....I do post at GURU3d (username benktlottie) mainly, but as I think I now have the number 1 spot for SuperPi @ 1m, I thought I better put it here !!!

Heres the link. Have I included enough information in the screenshot to be included ? I was running an FX55 San Diego @ 3507mhz and Redline RAM @ 2.2.2.5 @ 3.5v. Cooling was single phase with MACH 2GT

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y15...ttie/24312.jpg
06-18-2005, 02:50 AM
benktlottie

8m time of 4m 31s 031

FX55 San Diego running at 3475mhz, Redline @ 2.2.2.5

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y15...tie/431031.jpg
06-18-2005, 03:32 AM
NiCKE^

I know there is a better superpi 1m record so I'm going to search for a screen of it. I will update the 8M how ever
06-18-2005, 06:23 AM
Mathias-K

Dothan madness ;)

Intel:
780: Kaz-N - 4000.03MHz http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclo...matique/4G.jpg
06-18-2005, 06:26 AM
Mathias-K

By the way, it says something quite Xtreme! ;)

"Celeron-M 1400: crotale - 5754,70 MHz http://www.nordiccrew.com/crotale/ocsm.jpg"

That would be 3754,70MHz, right? :)
06-18-2005, 06:39 AM
NiCKE^

Yeah, gonna change it.....
06-21-2005, 12:41 AM
Tom Holck

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

Yeah, gonna change it.....

Change Me a little bit too NiCKE :D

AMD SUper Pi M8 4:20

http://www.ministry-oc.net/contests/...re.php?s=61150

And

AMD Superpi M32 19:54

http://www.ministry-oc.net/contests/...re.php?s=61151

The records is also here:
http://holicho.lib.net/pi3355/pi3355.htm

http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/TomHolcksPi32(WR).JPG

And here:

http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/838RANK-NEW.htm
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...chmentid=22354
06-21-2005, 12:51 PM
NiCKE^

Damn that is like a Xtreme Home makeover in the thread, do I look like those people? :D
06-22-2005, 01:07 AM
TheMeatFrog

I hate to take stephen's place but it must be done. Atleast this is stephen's chip :D A huge thanks to Lestat with out him this wouldn't of been possible! :toast:
3200+ Venice 0515APAW
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/24323.png
CPUz validation http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=24323
:clap:
06-22-2005, 03:18 AM
NiCKE^

Congrats to a very nice score there man!
06-22-2005, 03:48 AM
TheMeatFrog

Thanks! Much <3 :D :toast:
06-22-2005, 05:21 AM
Tyrou

3.46EE: Tyrou - 4679.99 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=24118
06-22-2005, 05:41 AM
NiCKE^

Congrats to the WR Tyrou, got any benches around there to show me? :D (Intel fanboy) :)
06-22-2005, 06:06 AM
Tyrou

Thanks NiCKE^ :)

I'll post some since I finish to reinstall my benching disk :D
06-22-2005, 06:07 AM
NiCKE^

Sounds really nice!
06-22-2005, 06:41 AM
Tyrou

Still waiting for windows to reinstall... but I found an older o/c(that's the reason of cpuz's old version) :

550: Tyrou - 5203.0 MHz http://img44.echo.cx/img44/4861/52030mz.png
06-22-2005, 06:42 AM
NiCKE^

Will add ;) It's a 550J right?
06-22-2005, 06:48 AM
Tyrou

not a J, just a 550 :)
06-22-2005, 07:00 AM
NiCKE^

Oki will fix it.
06-23-2005, 04:48 AM
PeGGaaSuSS

WR for Celeron 320D ?

http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/24482.png

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=24482
06-23-2005, 05:21 AM
NiCKE^

Probably, well done will update.
06-23-2005, 08:35 AM
Verdict

here is the Intel P4 550 record about 1 year old, allmost :D

http://www.oc-rapid.com/pics/Intel_P..._5400mhz_2.JPG
06-23-2005, 10:02 AM
NiCKE^

Whos record is that?
06-23-2005, 11:31 AM
1337mr.hanky

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

Whos record is that?

yeah posted that year to late (why dont i believe you)

nice one, but not quite good enought for a record, to bad
06-23-2005, 12:13 PM
SDX

I think you should have a FX-55 Sledgehammer .13 for Ricky/pedro and San Diego .9 for Shamino.
06-23-2005, 12:34 PM
NiCKE^

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1337mr.hanky

yeah posted that year to late (why dont i believe you)

nice one, but not quite good enought for a record, to bad

Is it yours?

SDX, I will consider it.
06-23-2005, 04:53 PM
Mathias-K

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

SDX, I will consider it.

With 5 different 3500+'s, why not 2 FX55's? :)
06-23-2005, 05:02 PM
NiCKE^

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mathias-K

With 5 different 3500+'s, why not 2 FX55's? :)

It's 3 AM here so take it eeeeeeeeeasy please :) Will add it tomorrow, MIGHT :D
06-24-2005, 01:17 AM
Mathias-K

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

It's 3 AM here so take it eeeeeeeeeasy please :) Will add it tomorrow, MIGHT :D

:p:
06-24-2005, 09:12 AM
Verdict

that was my one year old test, i start look at that WR list and i saw " 550 target " then i post that shot :D, Asus P5P800, KHX3500 2x256mb, Fully modded... there is lots of pics and shots in the same folder...
06-25-2005, 01:59 PM
yodadu92

My celeron M 350 (1300), air cooled, stock voltage

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=22770

Anyone higher? :)
06-25-2005, 04:47 PM
Sesto Sento

give that celeron-m some more volts ;) that shoul overclock even more than that on air ;)
06-26-2005, 08:48 AM
yodadu92

He will pass to phase change in three week, (in air, highter vcore does anything) but it's a b1, and i think i'm hurt in fsb wall :(
06-26-2005, 11:09 PM
Unseen

fill 540 place with that :) --> http://www.thelab.gr/attachment.php?s=&postid=175182
06-27-2005, 04:28 AM
GoThr3k

what is the highest ram speed ?????
because my cpu is too weak for the bandwidth benchmark
if i had only that cascade
06-28-2005, 02:51 AM
Mike@Portugal

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

Celeron-M 1400: crotale - 3754,70 MHz http://www.nordiccrew.com/crotale/ocsm.jpg

That's not an Celeron M!!! That's a Intel Celeron Mobile which is very diferent!!

Celeron M -> Based on Pentium M
Intel Celeron Mobile -> Based on P4

Someone correct that please.
06-28-2005, 04:22 AM
Sesto Sento

it can also be a bug of cpu-z... only version 1.29 will tell us if it's true or not
06-28-2005, 07:37 AM
NiCKE^

Fixed.
06-29-2005, 01:05 AM
Andrewv

i have noob question.
why most of people say that AMD stronger than Intel, but all WRs in Superpi belongs to Intel
06-29-2005, 02:29 AM
gubben

4000+ (ClawHammer): gubben - 3514.77 MHz http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=25221
It is 3614,77 MHz
06-29-2005, 03:22 AM
NiCKE^

Gubben, updated...
Andrewv, because it changes from application to application and benchmark to benchmark :P
06-29-2005, 01:28 PM
Andrewv

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

Gubben, updated...
Andrewv, because it changes from application to application and benchmark to benchmark :P

So why every one use superpi ? :D try pifast amd vs intel
06-29-2005, 02:04 PM
NiCKE^

Try something like 3DMark and you will se :P
06-29-2005, 10:23 PM
Andrewv

Quote:

Originally Posted by NiCKE^

Try something like 3DMark and you will se :P

3dmark tests your V.card no cpu/mem (system)
06-30-2005, 03:26 AM
NiCKE^

Well, I didn't understand the last and this is a WR thread and not a why does people say AMD is better when Intel got better SuperPi records :D

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:10 PM.

XtremeSystems