even better :DQuote:
Originally posted by QuadDamage
CodeRed,
actually you can deduct 1s off the SPi and PiFast benches. when i turned on the 1T Command, stock SPi was 36s for an AMD64 and 35s for an FX chip.
Also 3DMArk was 300-400 points higher
Printable View
even better :DQuote:
Originally posted by QuadDamage
CodeRed,
actually you can deduct 1s off the SPi and PiFast benches. when i turned on the 1T Command, stock SPi was 36s for an AMD64 and 35s for an FX chip.
Also 3DMArk was 300-400 points higher
/droolQuote:
Originally posted by QuadDamage
CodeRed,
actually you can deduct 1s off the SPi and PiFast benches. when i turned on the 1T Command, stock SPi was 36s for an AMD64 and 35s for an FX chip.
Also 3DMArk was 300-400 points higher
/runs for towel
Guys that can't be a FX-53 for S939. It's the Newcastle! The CPUZ screens show the Athlon 64 badge clearly (thank you for not blocking it out!) :D
If this is true - impressive :)
Youre calling QD a liar? :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by IvanAndreevich
Guys that can't be a FX-53 for S939. It's the Newcastle! The CPUZ screens show the Athlon 64 badge clearly (thank you for not blocking it out!) :D
If this is true - impressive :)
It says AthlonFX....Quote:
Originally posted by IvanAndreevich
Guys that can't be a FX-53 for S939. It's the Newcastle! The CPUZ screens show the Athlon 64 badge clearly (thank you for not blocking it out!) :D
If this is true - impressive :)
Heh, duh.....I thought that of all things would have been noticed straight out. ;)Quote:
Originally posted by aoc007
It says AthlonFX....
i know this is somewhat off topic guys, but what is the maximum voltage recommended for a fx53 on decent air cooling?
everytime i set my SK8V to Turbo, my voltage sky rockets to 1.78v! im wondering if this is ok...
IN turbo mode the motherboard does raise the voltage.
If you look at the FSB with WCPUID or CPU-Z you will also see that it's running at 223 with a multiplier of 11.
So......
Bottom line, how fast is S939FX compared to 940 FX??? Will the 939 FX OC as far as 940?? Hmmmmmmmmm...
C
Hallowed
>>Youre calling QD a liar?
Simply stating that if my assumpion was true, it would be impressive :banana:
aoc007
Actually it's BOTH the Newcastle and the FX. Take a look @ his link. I was referring to the this:
http://www.tbreak.com/forums/attachm...achmentid=9483
And it says A64.
one of the chips is indeed A64 and the other is FX. Both on the same mobo and both work with the same exact ram sticks:D Now the only diffrenece between A64 and FX chips is L2 cache. Both are stupid fast btw, faster than older chips clock for clock. Also both chips are faster than a P4EE by quite a bit:D
Tom,
sorry for stealing your thread. Had to reply to them peeps:D
Nice, Quad...so guess it just depends on how far the new CPU's will OC.... may be a good time to find CHEAP s940 FX-51's and FX-53's on eBay...
C
and then buy expensive ram to run them.
Nah, i'll wait for 939 :D
most likely those are new A64 FX-53 SledgeHammer and A64 3800+ Newcastle... both for Socket939 featuring "1Ghz HyperTransport"
@ Tom Holck: ....Tom....what i've forgot to ask: did you remove the IHS from the FX ?
or are that results with the IHS on the fx ?
@Tom I noticed in your insulation preparation you used a material that looks to be like Nventiv's Seal String product. Is there a good substitute that you know of that can be used instead of buying the genuine stuff?
Thanks and excellent work, looking forward to the x800 benches :toast:
Any AC company can supply you with that black grease.Quote:
Originally posted by phobix
@Tom I noticed in your insulation preparation you used a material that looks to be like Nventiv's Seal String product. Is there a good substitute that you know of that can be used instead of buying the genuine stuff?
Thanks and excellent work, looking forward to the x800 benches :toast:
cost almost nothing.
The same produckt that nVentiv send, can you buy from 3M
http://products3.3m.com/catalog/us/e...esolutions_3_0
Quote:
Originally posted by p4z1f1st
@ Tom Holck: ....Tom....what i've forgot to ask: did you remove the IHS from the FX ?
or are that results with the IHS on the fx ?
You can gain a little (20-50 Mhz) if you remove the IHS. But it's most importent to get good contakt to the coolinghead. You have to tighten. In that case its better NOT to remove the IHS.
If you go air, I will recommend it, but be beware.
@ Tom: AFAIK you can get many more tolerance (>100MHz) and you get lower temps.....:stick:
p.s.: nice triple-post :D ;)
Your right in the old dayes "Intel 533 FSB" 80-100Mhz was posible, but with phase change cooling and new processors it's less.Quote:
Originally posted by p4z1f1st
@ Tom: AFAIK you can get many more tolerance (>100MHz) and you get lower temps.....:stick:
p.s.: nice triple-post :D ;)
I remember it was the P4 3.53 processor. I removed the IHF. Then make a Quicksilver/aloy filling (I'm a dentist) around the naked core, but a moddet March I cubber cooling head on.
When it dries there was a solid homogen unit Core and coolinghead together (no grease!!) It was one of the first schreenshot for 4Ghz.
Quicksilver because of its capillary action ? (don't know if it's right - in german it's "Kapillar-effekt")
Edit: I'm going to remove the IHS on my (in summer coming) A64 3800+ .....do you think it would bring a little boost with watercooling....(my current cooling)
No. I made a "filling" like in a tooth. Quicksilver, silver-aloy and cubber makes a kemical "metal" together. And it ekspand a little.Quote:
Originally posted by p4z1f1st
Quicksilver because of its capillary action ? (don't know if it's right - in german it's "Kapillar-effekt")
"the best contakt you can get"
But don't do it. Pure quicksilver is dangerus.
Edit: If you can get good contakt with your waterhead, without to mutch pressure, you will gain a little.
by hideo :
S940 Athlon64 FX-53(0414VPMW) SK8N/Vcore1.93V
http://www012.upp.so-net.ne.jp/ohij2/24.gif
‘O‰ñAx13iFSB259j‚ÌŽŽ‚µÄ‚« ‚Å24h‚ðŒ©‚ê‚½‚Ì‚Å‚·‚ª Û‘¶‚ÉŽ¸”s‚µ
‰÷‚µ‚¢Žv‚¢‚ð‚µ‚Ü‚µ‚½ BÎŽ©‘Ì‚Í‚Ü‚¾‚Ü‚¾—]—T‚ª‚_‚è‚»‚¤‚¾‚Á‚½‚Ì Å
¡‰ñ‚ÍAx13.5‚Ńuƒ“‰ô‚µ‚É “O‚µ‚Ü‚µ‚½BSK8V‚âA8V‚É”ä ׂ¿‚å‚¢‚Æ’x‚ß‚Ì
SK8N‚Å‚Í23"‚Í3550•Ó‚è‚ʼnô‚ ‚È‚¢‚Æ’B¬•s‰Â”\‚ÈŒvŽZ É‚È‚è‚Ü‚·B
dang, i can't believe a prescott still beats a sledgehammer @ 3400MHz
very cool clocks
New frequency record with an AMD64
http://www012.upp.so-net.ne.jp/ohij2/24-5.gif
http://www012.upp.so-net.ne.jp/ohij2/838-2.gif
damn charlie! hurry up and get some more dry ice already! :D
THAT, of course ,depends on the benchmark you use ;)Quote:
Originally posted by snowwie
dang, i can't believe a prescott still beats a sledgehammer @ 3400MHz
very cool clocks
Wouldn't say no to a FX at those speeds