Already ORB is running OK for all projects..., you can update the ranking tictac. :)
Since the new 3DMark requirements for the ranking..., the thread seems to be "dead"..., what happends? :confused:
Printable View
Already ORB is running OK for all projects..., you can update the ranking tictac. :)
Since the new 3DMark requirements for the ranking..., the thread seems to be "dead"..., what happends? :confused:
Abit nf7-s Dual channel
Barton M 2500+ 232x12
Adata bh5
R9800pro
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7727699
dfi infinty, dual channel
10x258, look at cpu speed, its 10x250 to boot and clockgen to 258.
sig has all other info
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7694423
Single Channel, 225x10, 1.85vcore 2.9vdimm. timings - 2,2,2,11. Double-Sided BH-5, extra info in sig...
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7643097
DFI NFII Ultra LanParty B
Dual Channel
Kingston HyperX PC3200 (KHX3200K2) BH-5
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7706284
Where it is tictac? ..., he forgot this thread. :confused:
I wonder what's more important than that thread ;) :D ?Quote:
Originally posted by Cap_Hook
Where it is tictac? ..., he forgot this thread. :confused:
climbing up the ladder... :cool:
update plizzzz :D
244 FSB DC 11-2-2 cas2
whole set of screens 'n links u will find in my sig... thanx, bro :toast:
EDIT: SAE, i finally caught up with ya on NF7-S fsb-wise :) just need a decent video card again...
:thumbsup:Quote:
Originally posted by bachus_anonym
244 FSB DC 11-2-2 cas2
whole set of screens 'n links u will find in my sig... thanx, bro :toast:
EDIT: SAE, i finally caught up with ya on NF7-S fsb-wise :) just need a decent video card again...
Nice, my friend... I did not have a decent vidcard ;) (bad clocking one I still own, artifact-free at 475-744)
My perfectly stable fsb with nf7-s was 245MHz everything maxed...
And 11,5x multiplier. This thing was fast :D
Rank Update :stick:
sweet, thx tictac :) lolz u put like too many [bold] commands in mine :D never mind... i might have a 230+ run for u tomorrow.
Maybe the reason for the update delay was to keep the DFI's from killing the competition
;)
mong
Cool :D
I am first :cool:
I have a 262 APIC one too, just in case... ;)
thanx titac....
and i still have long way to go, though... time to pull the secret weapon out... :cool:
Umm..., the max FSB that I can see = 255 MHz..., and it's 4º in ranking!. :cool:
Another score from POLAND :D
245fsb 6-2-2-2 SINGLE
Mem - TwinMos CH-5 :D
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7741673
http://home.comcast.net/~shrmytoon/268x8.gif
Do I get bumped up or am I stuck at 250?:toast:
shroom you must prove its 3dmark01 stable.
any other enterence? :D
hey i got a nub question...
you need more vcore just when you ar reaching more mhz?.. the fsb doesnt need too much vcore right??.... plz pm to reply me... i dont wanna off topic the thread.
thx!:D
ya put ur multiplier @ 5
clock the fsb then submit a orb link
there u go
8x262MHz... just for fun :D
:thumbsup: APIC is ON!!! Booted into win2k at that :)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7752941
Tictac
http://upl.silentwhisper.net/uplfold...3fsb3dmark.jpg
I don´t have orb link... but a screen is beter. The orb don´t show right fsb.
lastviking, what u should do is take a screen with 3dmark2001 "Details" window expanded so we can see FSB (it will be different, too as shown in ORB) and then post link to ORB. then we can match the score to what ORB says, and then your score will be 100% valid, i suppose...
after second thought, i guess it wouldn't since u used clockgen...
i belive u need to boot to win with whatever FSB u run your bench with...
Nope the score is 100% Valid with use of clockgen or not. But the score sucked it only showed high fsb in 3Dmark2001 so i din´t save it...Only a screen with fsb and more runed in 3Dmark2001.. But i will make a new one later...need to change gfx + more to run the test again.Quote:
Originally posted by bachus_anonym
lastviking, what u should do is take a screen with 3dmark2001 "Details" window expanded so we can see FSB (it will be different, too as shown in ORB) and then post link to ORB. then we can match the score to what ORB says, and then your score will be 100% valid, i suppose...
after second thought, i guess it wouldn't since u used clockgen...
i belive u need to boot to win with whatever FSB u run your bench with...
Quote:
Originally posted by TicTac
Take Note:
- NF7 series show 1MHz lower on ORB Link
- DFI Infinity start from 1MHz after 266MHz
- Clock Gen FSB not certified here
GFX doesn't matter here... FSB is what matters...Quote:
Originally posted by TicTac
But the score sucked it only showed high fsb in 3Dmark2001 so i din´t save it
EDIT: i assume, that clockgen and nf7s(8rda)vcore results don't qualify due to some doubts that could arise whether system that can't boot with particular FSB is stable even though 3dmark01 can be run...
also i supppose there's just too many ways to "adjust" the score so that's why those apps are sort of prohibited...
Wow. I just had finished an APIC run at 265MHz fsb :slobber:
Used clockgen to get it from 262... then later wanting to save the screenie I had a lockup due to apic :(
Gonna try 270 w/out apic ;)
Can post another 262, this time multi 9x :)
nice... if it only booted at 265FSB...
Wrong... DFI showing 1MHz for 257MHz fsb ;)Quote:
Originally posted by tictac
Take Note:
- DFI Infinity start from 1MHz after 266MHz
/edited :D
Yeah. Exactly... I can boot into win easily at 270fsb and do sandra.... w/out apic. But here the heat created enters the ring... as Lastviking said ;)Quote:
Originally posted by bachus_anonym
nice... if it only booted at 265FSB...
No stability at room temp/ambient of 25°C... 265 is working though :) maybe I'll post a link tomorrow :D
My infinity reports
256=0
257=1
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7587355
I believe it is 258=2 260=4 etc.
Quote:
Originally posted by bachus_anonym
GFX doesn't matter here... FSB is what matters...
EDIT: i assume, that clockgen and nf7s(8rda)vcore results don't qualify due to some doubts that could arise whether system that can't boot with particular FSB is stable even though 3dmark01 can be run...
also i supppose there's just too many ways to "adjust" the score so that's why those apps are sort of prohibited...
Yeah but i don´t save scores that i don´t use on Orb.....And i cant run 3Dmark2001 on a 2Mb pci card...so gfx matter to me..
And the fsb in Orb are not right...
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7483802
I got 11 @268fsb.
And i cane boot @ 270fsb+ if a wants.
Super pi:273fsb+
Sandra: 283.6fsb+
Cpu-z: 291fsb+
But if my screen in 3Dmark2001 @273fsb are not valid for you...i leaving this treat.. :rolleyes:
Hey. LV don't be so childish ;) :DQuote:
Originally posted by Lastviking
But if my screen in 3Dmark2001 @273fsb are not valid for you...i leaving this treat.. :rolleyes:
Stay... I don't think anybody would doubt you did it... since you were the pioneer in high fsb ocing of the nf2u400 :thumbsup:
I can do 3dmark at 268 too, everything higher is too unstable by far... :rolleyes: Temps are the key Lastviking used for his runs :D
LV, don't take it too personal...
i just said that the rules of this ranking are so not to use clockgen... and in the case of 3dmark01 not reading FSB correctly once u pass 256FSB - the solution, to confirm the result - is to:
- post a screen with 3dmark01 score,
- show score details expanded so we can see what 3dmark01 read as FSB for the purpose of ORB,
- use CPU-Z to show mem clock and timmings,
- and link to ORB.
therefore Tictac could match the score from ORB with the score from the screenie and then he could validate it even though ORB FSB doesn't match...
I dont understand how a score like LV's above, is lower than ricjax's here: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7743301
is 22k a normal score for those settings? i am by no means saying he "cheated" or anything.. just curious. his fsb isnt that high.
I can honestly say i 100% did that legit mate i have never cheated. Not that you are saying that, just want to make that clear.Quote:
Originally posted by FlyingHamster
I dont understand how a score like LV's above, is lower than ricjax's here: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7743301
is 22k a normal score for those settings? i am by no means saying he "cheated" or anything.. just curious. his fsb isnt that high.
Its all in the driver set, os and MB's you can save.
When i run 2K1 i use the following rules of thumb before running:
- Defragged HDD prior to reboot
- No none critical services running
- No tray apps period
- No explorer, boot straight into taskmanager shell
- Lan, sata and audio disabled via bios and device manager
- A maximum of 53-55MB's used with 3d mark loaded
I use the following driver/os set:
- ATi Cat 3.7
- nForce 2.45
- DirectX 8.1
- Win 2000 Pro, service pack 4
I pulled 21,737 on my NF7 same clocks but 450/380 so the score holds true.
There are other ways to get high scores if you work at it. High FSB helps but its not the only thing. ;)
Heres another example of a near 22K at only 225 FSB http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7051765 *props to Paddy007uk*
If you take a look at LV's score he beats me i everything bar the car tests which the driver set, os and tweaks help ALOT.
oh ok, well I guess all those tweaks explain some of the score. dont get me wrong, I was not saying u were cheating or got a bugged score.. I was just curious as to how LV's fsb of 268 got a lower score in 2001 than yours at 233. Regardless, great score m8 and keep up the good work. :)
cheers :toast:
If i have time later this evening i could do a screen of what the task man looks like prior to running 2K1 ;)Quote:
Originally posted by FlyingHamster
oh ok, well I guess all those tweaks explain some of the score. dont get me wrong, I was not saying u were cheating or got a bugged score.. I was just curious as to how LV's fsb of 268 got a lower score in 2001 than yours at 233. Regardless, great score m8 and keep up the good work. :)
cheers :toast:
If i bench without tweaking there can be anything upto 100MB used for just the OS let alone 2K1. Having a empty process list and more free memory helps a lot :toast:
haha yea.. show a screenie of that. :D
so the 3.7's worked best for u over all the other cats in win2k?
I'll see what i can do ;)Quote:
Originally posted by FlyingHamster
haha yea.. show a screenie of that. :D
so the 3.7's worked best for u over all the other cats in win2k?
Yeah 3.7's OWN period. :cool:
how do you get rid of explorer and make it boot directly to taskmanager?
Im afraid if i told you i would have to kill you ;)Quote:
Originally posted by Shroomalistic
how do you get rid of explorer and make it boot directly to taskmanager?
I was going to ask the same thing... im sure the nice folk over at 3dmark team will tell me no probs, meany :mad: :DQuote:
Originally posted by ricjax99
Im afraid if i told you i would have to kill you ;)
:p: :smileysexQuote:
Originally posted by r3b0rN
I was going to ask the same thing... im sure the nice folk over at 3dmark team will tell me no probs, meany :mad: :D
Lastviking's score is lower cause he's done it with APIC OFF!!!
(At least I think so)
Otherwise he would be faster... :)
I can do a 3dmark at 265MHz APIC on but I use clockgen to get it after booting at 262... it's the max you can get into windows.
Also the reason why i ran 233 x 11 is 240 x 10.5 was giving me kickouts :(
Running:
2.00V Vcore
1.60V Vagp
1.60V Vchipset
3.30V Vdimm
1:1 - 11-2-2-2-2,0-9-12 enabled, enabled, fast (Alpha settings on AUTO)
:confused:
If i could keep that clock speed up and crack of a 242-245 x 10.5 i'd prolly be looking at more :(
WinMe = Don´t uses Apic(correct me if i´m wrong.) = Lower score.Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
Lastviking's score is lower cause he's done it with APIC OFF!!!
(At least I think so)
Otherwise he would be faster... :)
I can do a 3dmark at 265MHz APIC on but I use clockgen to get it after booting at 262... it's the max you can get into windows.
Dx9 = Lower score.
Bad Nf2 drivers = Lower score.
DX8.1 is better?? always used dx9.Quote:
Originally posted by Lastviking
WinMe = Don´t uses Apic(correct me if i´m wrong.) = Lower score.
Dx9 = Lower score.
Bad Nf2 drivers = Lower score.
WinME has only crippled APIC suppport what means it does not work. (OFF)
Quote:
Originally posted by Shroomalistic
how do you get rid of explorer and make it boot directly to taskmanager?
i know, i know... :D i run my benches with winxp down to max 61MB after 3dmark01 loads-up... there's still few services i could kill, though.Quote:
Originally posted by ricjax99
Im afraid if i told you i would have to kill you
killing explorer is a lot easier than u think... but it's kind of hard to take any screenshots then :) but doable...
not done the screenie yet im on msn helping someone out, but btw my explorer process doesnt get killed, it never loads in 2K period ;)Quote:
Originally posted by bachus_anonym
i know, i know... :D i run my benches with winxp down to max 61MB after 3dmark01 loads-up... there's still few services i could kill, though.
killing explorer is a lot easier than u think... but it's kind of hard to take any screenshots then :) but doable...
Has anyone gotten 4500MB/s in Sandra yet?
Yeah. Many P4 users and some A64 owner :D ;)Quote:
Originally posted by Spec3
Has anyone gotten 4500MB/s in Sandra yet?
What's worth it??? You can't even get 270 really 3dmark-stable at room temp. So it's of no practical use :confused:
who said anything about practical :D
Hehe :DQuote:
Originally posted by r3b0rN
who said anything about practical :D
For me it has to be 3d stable at least... :thumbsup:
here we go again :D
another issue is
Command Per Clock : Disable
rank update
Hey tictac :) Where's my 262 fsb :D???
211mhz with a A7N8X-X is actually on there...i have gotten 215 with mine!!!!!!!
single channel with a no name brand of pc3200
3dmark link??? :DQuote:
Originally posted by Conflict
211mhz with a A7N8X-X is actually on there...i have gotten 215 with mine!!!!!!!
single channel with a no name brand of pc3200
thats just it though...i did it using clockgen one night when Kunaak was helping me break 15,000 with my Ti4200...only registered as standard 200 in the orb
u have SAE's barton oc for the a64 user's 3dmark compare... :D
I have a question, if I turn apic off wil I need to reinstall OS, just because of that, (not counting the possibility of subsequent corruption)? Is anything required, i.e., clear cmos or reset config. data?
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7704451
250 fsb, stock R350 :)
First uninstall apic (acpi-uniproc-pc) in windows control panel/device manager... Turn it into Standard Pc or ACPI-PC... then quit windows and turn it off in bios. Restart windows and it should work if it did not corrupt anything ;) :DQuote:
Originally posted by coop
I have a question, if I turn apic off wil I need to reinstall OS, just because of that, (not counting the possibility of subsequent corruption)? Is anything required, i.e., clear cmos or reset config. data?
thanks, I have different ram and cpu I'm working with/broiling, and may want to do a backup first.
Yeah. It's definately a good start :DQuote:
Originally posted by coop
thanks, I have different ram and cpu I'm working with/broiling, and may want to do a backup first.
Back it all up. You could end up with an unusable windows due to hal.dll not being installed right...
3D 2K1 @ 260MHz
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7539080
DFI Infinity
BH-5 @ 3.78V
Why did you hit your ram with such voltage-tortures ;) ?Quote:
Originally posted by Fewture
3D 2K1 @ 260MHz
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7539080
DFI Infinity
BH-5 @ 3.78V
Nice though :thumbsup:
Here's one at 2499 = 263x9,5 APIC on, cpc and all other stuff enabled :cool:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7787974
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7785836
253x10, everything on. Need more vDIMM or vDD before I get any higher, 255 is max Superpi FSB
Vdimm maybe, but vdd does nothing :(Quote:
Originally posted by Kameleon
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7785836
253x10, everything on. Need more vDIMM or vDD before I get any higher, 255 is max Superpi FSB
Makes it even more unstable. Dunno why, I did the mod as described and know it's working.
Is that even with vdd set to 1.9v or lower? I might not bother in that case, I'm pretty sure it's the vDIMM rather than the vDD holding me back - these DFI NBs are wicked :DQuote:
Originally posted by SAE
Vdimm maybe, but vdd does nothing :(
Makes it even more unstable. Dunno why, I did the mod as described and know it's working.
Yeah. I set vdd at 1,9V in bios and adjusted the mod... finally to 2.2V. But it did not do it. I always had the impression those standard 1.9V are not enough but the mod did not help at all :(Quote:
Originally posted by Kameleon
Is that even with vdd set to 1.9v or lower? I might not bother in that case, I'm pretty sure it's the vDIMM rather than the vDD holding me back - these DFI NBs are wicked :D
And setting the max to around 2V at 1.9V did not help either.
That's kinda annoying, especially as the VDD mod is very near one of the mosfets that I'll be covering with a rather large heatsink, so I'd have to decide whether to do the mod or not before I sinked the board fully.Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
Yeah. I set vdd at 1,9V in bios and adjusted the mod... finally to 2.2V. But it did not do it. I always had the impression those standard 1.9V are not enough but the mod did not help at all :(
And setting the max to around 2V at 1.9V did not help either.
Thanks a lot for the info, I might see if the IC's legs are large enough that I can do the mod with microclips...
I use microclips :DQuote:
Originally posted by Kameleon
That's kinda annoying, especially as the VDD mod is very near one of the mosfets that I'll be covering with a rather large heatsink, so I'd have to decide whether to do the mod or not before I sinked the board fully.
Thanks a lot for the info, I might see if the IC's legs are large enough that I can do the mod with microclips...
Oh, and something I may as well ask while you're around...;)
Do you mean it's the most you can get into windows with, or that there's some limit for everyone? I've never heard of such a thing...:confused:Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
I can do a 3dmark at 265MHz APIC on but I use clockgen to get it after booting at 262... it's the max you can get into windows.
ROFL :banana:Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
Yeah. Many P4 users and some A64 owner :D ;)
What's worth it??? You can't even get 270 really 3dmark-stable at room temp. So it's of no practical use :confused:
But has anyone done it with an AXP setup?
Incase there is indeed anyone, this anyone is Lastviking ;)Quote:
Originally posted by Spec3
ROFL :banana:
But has anyone done it with an AXP setup?
Hello all, 1st post here, a few of my friends at PimpRig told me about your site, and have been surfing the Forums here for a bit, and stumbled on this thread...
So far Ive been able to benchmark and ORB a run at 262 BIOS, single channel, CPC off and APIC enabled.
DFI LAN PARTY Rev B
XP2500+ Mobile
GEIL PC4000 256MB
ANTEC TRUE CONTROL 550 WATT P/S
ATI 9600XT (Stock Settings)
Here is a link for my run at @264
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7805108
http://forums.pimprig.com/attachment...chmentid=11660
I have also made a succesfull run at 266, but I can't ORB it, I lose my internet connection. I have been throught the forums looking for a fix, but nothing I have tried has worked yet.
I have disabled the onboard LAN and added a NIC card, that wasn't any help.
The board is stock for now, better NB and SB cooling are probably the only cure for it (Ordering a Micro Cool NB cooling kit tommorow)
I am also about to get a newer hard Drive, is a Raptor a good choice for high FSB, or would I be better off with an old style IDE drive?
I am sure one is better than the other when it comes to OS corruption issues, but I have not come across it in any threads yet.
Anyways..You guys have some wicked hardware here, and awesome Forums!
Because I like it!! :banana:Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
Why did you hit your ram with such voltage-tortures ;) ?
Nice though :thumbsup:
Here's one at 2499 = 263x9,5 APIC on, cpc and all other stuff enabled :cool:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7787974
You should know better SAE ;)
Why am I not in the list? I have posted 260+ sandra and 260 3D :(
Yeah. I know ;) But 3,78V!?!? For only 260? :eek:Quote:
Originally posted by Fewture
Because I like it!! :banana:
You should know better SAE ;)
Why am I not in the list? I have posted 260+ sandra and 260 3D :(
I love listings,
please note this :D
K7 AMD Dual Channel
http://members.home.nl/youpy/mem10t.jpg
A7N8X mobo
3.6 Vddr
2.5 Vdd :( needed for 250+
A64
http://members.home.nl/youpy/htt.jpg
Gigabyte K8N Pro mobo
My Abit AN7 in DC -->
Dang Necro looks like 300MHz FSB isn't too far away!!! :banana:
What kind of cooling is that on h2o or phase change?
~Bob
Can run mine @257 with cpc on @ 2-2-2-11 @3.3v.
And this is with mushie level 1 3500 which is CH-5
Oh this is dual channel with apic on
Nice CH-5 there :thumbsup:Quote:
Originally posted by enigma
Can run mine @257 with cpc on @ 2-2-2-11 @3.3v.
And this is with mushie level 1 3500 which is CH-5
Oh this is dual channel with apic on
But you at least have to post a 3dmark2k1 link to become member of the list...
Still ignored .... :mad:Quote:
Originally posted by yotomeczek
Another score from POLAND :D
245fsb 6-2-2-2 SINGLE
Mem - TwinMos CH-5 :D
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7741673
Yeah. Tictac hasn't been here for at least 2 weeks :(Quote:
Originally posted by yotomeczek
Still ignored .... :mad:
My 263 one dc, cpc on, apic on (bh-5) is not up there, too...
To get it 3D stable yes.. :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
Yeah. I know ;) But 3,78V!?!? For only 260? :eek:
my NF7 stock, with titan coolin in NB...
http://tirado.do.sapo.pt/fsb4.JPG
http://tirado.do.sapo.pt/fsb5.JPG
in DualChannel, muskin pc3200 lev2 powa.... and barton 2.5+
anybody here got mbot script....
HELP me update the ranking :P
Hi
I want to add my result to the list.
2X256Mb OCZ PC4200 (8-4-4-3-3), Abit NF7S ver 2.0, AMD Barton 2500+
Achieved FSB is 265MHz on dual channel.