congrats Tom Holck, this is a very good score :toast:
Printable View
congrats Tom Holck, this is a very good score :toast:
yeah, that's trueQuote:
Originally posted by Learn
congrats Tom Holck, this is a very good score :toast:
;)
Tom is in the Holicho's homepage :)
http://holicho.lib.net/pi3355/pi3355.htm
try on Win 2003, Win2003 64bits or WinXP 64bits
man this should be a sticky *hint hint*
I think that useing Win2003 Server or 64bit winxp like the #1 spot in the 32m rankings would improve that result a lot.
With optimal OS it would easily be the #1 result :toast:
Don't know if anyone seen this or not.Quote:
Originally posted by macci
I think that useing Win2003 Server or 64bit winxp like the #1 spot in the 32m rankings would improve that result a lot.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserv...l/default.mspx
It's Windows Server 2003 64bit Beta release from MS.
Downloading :D
Thanks for the link!
Wich version? :confused:Quote:
Originally posted by macci
Downloading :D
Thanks for the link!
The Itanium64? Im running an Intel sys so it should be that one?
I think you need a 64bit chip :)
Not neceserally it says that it supports both 32bit and 64bit.Quote:
Originally posted by Caprid
I think you need a 64bit chip :)
but now i decided to get all three :banana: :p:
"Microsoft® Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition (32-bit)"Quote:
Originally posted by Pejsen
Wich version? :confused:
The Itanium64? Im running an Intel sys so it should be that one?
This is for 32-bit.
OkQuote:
Originally posted by Endre
"Microsoft® Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition (32-bit)"
This is for 32-bit.
But i think i read somewhere that a 64bit also would gain performance for a 32bit but anyhow that sound like non-sense to me :)
I will try the 32bit version first then.
thx I'm dowloading too for my collectionQuote:
Originally posted by Caprid
Don't know if anyone seen this or not.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserv...l/default.mspx
It's Windows Server 2003 64bit Beta release from MS.
http://home.no.net/endreke/images/SuperPI40s.JPG
XP2400 with Swiftech MCX462-V and a 3000rpm 92mm.
Not copletely maxed out, so maybe I can tak 39s with the system as it is now.
8M is not so borring as 32M.
http://www.biwa.ne.jp/~yok/838RANK-NEW.htm
I think Yok put me #1 soon:banana:
just tried that win2003server 64 bit for AMD. It has to bee a boot-CD. But it wont boot it's "protecttion fault" ??
Here is mine.I will try again soon with R404
http://members.lycos.co.uk/csmo/Comp...uperPi_All.gif
Wee, Super Pi for me too. :)
so macci, any luck with 64-Bit OS?
Quad, I'm lazy. Haven't even installed it yet :D
Will try tomorrow/weekend if I find the time and A64 board/CPU.
btw, here is Vigor with P4 EE @ 5.03:
http://v-tec.hp.infoseek.co.jp/3339A...2100V-303S.jpg
I lately got my barton to do 34 on 1m :D
260x11 11-2-2-2-2,0-12-16
No shot till I am online again @home :(
Here is mine
That is a very nice result :slobber:Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
I lately got my barton to do 34 on 1m :D
260x11 11-2-2-2-2,0-12-16
No shot till I am online again @home :(
Wonder how mine will perform when I get vmod and Mach1 :D
Here is mine too with mem timings 7-4-4-2.5
Thx :DQuote:
Originally posted by Try-this
That is a very nice result :slobber:
Wonder how mine will perform when I get vmod and Mach1 :D
Good luck with ya Mach1 :thumbsup:
My 24/7 system written below in my sig, is doing it in 44sec.
here is my 29s
38 sec at 303Fsb and 5/4. At 305 it would crash;)
Thank you too :)Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
Thx :D
Good luck with ya Mach1 :thumbsup:
Hopefully I'll get my mach 1 next week - and the, when I get my "modding-tools", I'll mod the mobo :D
XP2500+
NF7-S v2.0
http://www.hpautoelectrics.com/OverC...%20superPi.jpg
mine seems really low
37 seconds on a 3.0C oc-ed to 4.0
:(
hmm sounds much too slow.. what mem speed is that at 4ghz?
Here is my score...
http://members.chello.se/ridex/SuperPi228x12.jpg
http://www.saunalahti.fi/~chedu/team...rpi1m_2811.gif
1M: 35s
2500+@2811MHz (11*255)
Asus A7N8X DLX
2*256MB KHXPC3000, 5-2-2-2
Have had some trouble with the 64OS, still some 32 bit emulation and bad drivers, but::Quote:
Originally posted by macci
I think that useing Win2003 Server or 64bit winxp like the #1 spot in the 32m rankings would improve that result a lot.
With optimal OS it would easily be the #1 result :toast:
Superpi 24.46 :slobber: :D
I noticed something interesting, when I go 64 bit, the FX gets more hot, and the men timings can't be so tight. It might be bad drivers og it might be some new activity in the CPU, when it's going 64bit:confused: :rolleyes:
WOW Tom :slobber:
Very nice time indeed :slobber:
Can't stop :slobber: 'ing
Quote:
Originally posted by MickeyMouse
tom is that a WR 32m run?? :)
Congrat's awomse work so what ya loose 50mhz core and a few mhz on the fsb??
I think the WR were 25:55, but Tom has smashed it completly :cool:
Very nice improvement Tom :toast:
but the WR is 24m 36s (FX at 3G, 240 1:1 2-2-2-5). So there is 10secs to go.
sorry tom but the new WR is now at 24'36 with a FX-51@only 3009MHz :slobber:Quote:
Originally posted by Try-this
I think the WR were 25:55, but Tom has smashed it completly :cool:
http://219.113.251.125/c-board/file/...EN_3009.40.png
brrrrrQuote:
Originally posted by macci
Very nice improvement Tom :toast:
but the WR is 24m 36s (FX at 3G, 240 1:1 2-2-2-5). So there is 10secs to go.
I'm grilled :mad:
cpulloverclock, damn I'm fast :D
btw think what OPPs FX at 12x256 1:1 2-2-2-6 would get on that bench!
possible but toms FX can bench at 3190MHzQuote:
Originally posted by macci
cpulloverclock, damn I'm fast :D
btw think what OPPs FX at 12x256 1:1 2-2-2-6 would get on that bench!
same score between 245*13 or 256*12?
Its 245 1:1 2-3-2-5 vs 256 1:1 2-2-2-5 If I remember correctly. So 256x12 might be faster overall.Quote:
same score between 245*13 or 256*12?
Jason, yea thats crazy :D
Notice that his Trc is at 7! :0
btw, the man behind that 32m WR is also a member of these forums - kyosen from Japan.
Quote:
Originally posted by macci
Jason, yea thats crazy :D
Notice that his Trc is at 7! :0
I also have Trc7 Macci,
You remenber right my timings is 2-3-5-2
Tried everithing 2-2-2-11 almost work but crach on desktop?
Do you think more Mem-volt vill work, I am on 3.25, my PSU can get me more, but will it get me 2-5-2-2 ?? Bad Corsair RE erly realise?
:rolleyes:
I'd try up to like 3.5V for Vddr.
I guess its possible that Corsair have used BH5 and CH5 on that RAM series? Maybe yours has CH5 (and OPP and Quad for instance has the BH5)?
CH5 quite often runs with RAS to CAS at 3 only.
Just tried 3.53Volt cas 2-2-11-2 went blue schreen just before desktop:bsod:Quote:
Originally posted by macci
I'd try up to like 3.5V for Vddr.
I guess its possible that Corsair have used BH5 and CH5 on that RAM series? Maybe yours has CH5 (and OPP and Quad for instance has the BH5)?
CH5 quite often runs with RAS to CAS at 3 only.
Removed the headspreader, you are right, it's CH5...
By some other Corsair next week, then I also can try x4 ?!
The M32 @ 3094 was safe bench. The PC have been turn on for very long time M/B temp close to 40 C now. Some other time at fresh boot. I can go +40/+50 Hz and take the 10 sek:rolleyes:
Thanks Macci, the mem mysteri is solved.
well.Quote:
Originally posted by macci
Very nice improvement Tom :toast:
but the WR is 24m 36s (FX at 3G, 240 1:1 2-2-2-5). So there is 10secs to go.
Tried a few times I admit,
24.21
:slobber: :D
FX-51 at 3120 2.080volt
mem 240 cas 2-3-5-2-7-14 3.25 volt
I have new Corsair comming in a few dayes hope for 2-5-2-2
that's insane tom!
Takes me nearly 46 minutes with my Barton 2500+ @ 2555Mhz :D
Yeap,
M32 is almost action for me now.
right down the figure, zip the wine, look at the clock (sek)
and.... new figure...
wait a few sekunds
right down the figure, zip the wine, look at the clock (sek)
and.... new figure...
In the background I hear the 2 big compressors working hard
to pump the R1150a
looking at the ice formation om the M/B. checking the volt
checking the temp ... etc
very exiting :banana:
damn good :D
congrats Tom Holck
I got my superpi 1m time down to 38s, need more vDIMM and vDD along with non-stock cooling on the northy if I'm gonna get anything better than this. I reckon 11x236 will get me 37s if the scaling works correctly.
12.0 x 216 = 39s
11.5 x 226 = 38s
11.0 x 236 = ??s
http://www.enscape.net/bigz/GCS0002.jpg
No matter what vCore above 2.2v I set, it freezes either in windows or on boot. I think the mosfets or vregs aren't upto it though cause it only reads 2.15v idle, 2.09v load.
not bad for a silent pc with a cooling setup that's not designed to perform :) (3/8" OD tubing)
Hi Tom. Was your benchmark run on Windows 2003 64-bit server? And would you get a worse or better run on any other 32-bit windows version?
http://digilander.libero.it/daneviz/...202500/35b.JPG
vcore = 2.25v by bios, cooled by prommy :stick:
timings was 11222 if I remember well :confused: :p:
Yes, the M32 was on win 2003 server AMD 64 bit. A little worse results on 2003 32 bit or XP or win2000. On the other hand can I go a little faster (3151mhz) on 32 bit in M32 ? My old record wasQuote:
Originally posted by some_young_guy
Hi Tom. Was your benchmark run on Windows 2003 64-bit server? And would you get a worse or better run on any other 32-bit windows version?
3133 Mhz in win-xp it was 26.26 same timings etc.
It seems like the 64 bit runs a lot hotter, but its fast in M32 as you can see.
In Pifast, M8 etc is XP the fastes for now. When properly set up, 2003 32 bit might be faster her.:toast:
and the 1M digits?Quote:
Originally posted by Tom Holck
Yes, the M32 was on win 2003 server AMD 64 bit. I little worse results on 2003 32 bit or XP or win2000. On the other hand can I go a little faster (3151mhz) on 32 bit in M32 ? My old record was
3133 Mhz in win-xp it was 26.26 same timings etc.
It seems like the 64 bit runs a lot hotter, but its fast in M32 as you can see.
In Pifast, M8 etc is XP the fastes for now. When properly set up, 2003 32 bit might be faster her.:toast:
always 25-26s?
Try a 10M PIFAST please
:stick:
ouch
that's incredible :eek:
268 1:1 in dual mode with a FX-51
5'52@2543MHz!!! awesome
http://www012.upp.so-net.ne.jp/ohij2/838-552.gif
and :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber: :slobber:
http://www012.upp.so-net.ne.jp/ohij2/330.gif
ohh my §§§§ing god...
thats gotta be a wold record in mem speed..
for an ECC moduleQuote:
Originally posted by bias_hjorth
ohh my §§§§ing god...
thats gotta be a wold record in mem speed..
Quote:
Originally posted by cpulloverclock
for an ECC module
yeah my point exactly :-)
what are those-- corsair?
sorry but I dont knowQuote:
Originally posted by bias_hjorth
yeah my point exactly :-)
what are those-- corsair?
:(
wait a minute, I look at something
M/B Asus SK8N(nForce3 Pro 150,modified by Dr.ƒXƒ‰ƒ“ƒv)
CPU Athlon64 FX-51
Infineon PC3200 BT-5(Type W=CH-5?) 512MB(Reg/ECC)x2
I finally got some superpi runs last night
29 seconds at 4.6Ghz
I wish superpi gave a little more accurate times in the tenths of a second.
I will upload when I fire up that hard drive.
-47 CQuote:
Originally posted by MickeyMouse
tom what temps show in the bios and under load on die temp's??
What have you seen ?
12 seconds on the G5
against dry ice and a 64 bit chip, im not doing so bad =)
If I run M32 at lets say 3152 at 2.112 volt for 15 min it stops.Quote:
Originally posted by MickeyMouse
dryice+acetone
3400+@1.9v@2.925ghz
-38c bios
-21c load
thru 32m superpi 26s< [/B]
If I reboot fast, then I see -32c in bios. In about 1 min it is back to -46/-47c . But it's only in 64 bit OS. In 32 bit 3152 Mhz +2 volt no temp drop.
konklusion -21/-38c is not sufficient:rolleyes:
Charlie had also dissapointments with FX and dryice.
Hi FUGGERQuote:
Originally posted by FUGGER
12 seconds on the G5
against dry ice and a 64 bit chip, im not doing so bad =)
nice you are back with some nice cooling
? 12 sek on what:confused:
Apple G5 can do pi to the millionth place in a little over 12 seconds @ 2.0Ghz
I have a G5 project comming up for 2.6Ghz on phase change.
I meant that going higher than -32 is clearly to high for 31xxMhz /64 bit speed on the FX. Then dryice cooling is not sufficient for proper cooling at that speed. We must use something better to go on. Costum Cascade, LN2 etc.Quote:
Originally posted by MickeyMouse
G5=apple I thinks :)
what compared to you?? I didnt understandd what ya meant?:confused:
My dryice container unlike charlies has alot more mass at the base like 4x's as much also I get dryice pelets so alot more surface area.. when I put the setup back on line Ill upload the MBM5 scrren high/low after the 32m run never did it drop below
-21c load not the best cooling, but it walks all over the mach II stock I have here. :) maybe Ill do LN2 one day soon.
BTW agree with you March II stock is not for FX, it's to hot:p:
Nice you still are here, read something in "speak freely"
:toast:
the best link : http://holicho.lib.net/pi3355/pi3355.htm
:toast:
Tom, I hope u'll be the first guy to break 5 min on the 8M digits of SuperPi with Win2k3 Server 64-Bit :)
But you are using different calculation program there right? So it cannot be compared at all.Quote:
Apple G5 can do pi to the millionth place in a little over 12 seconds @ 2.0Ghz
I remember seeing certain PiFast version do 1M at less than 10sec with ~4G P4.
29sec at 4.6G? That seems a bit slow. I was able to go just below 30 at 4.41G. 4519MHz gave 28sec and 4650 would have been 27 - I only got to 4648 which gave the same 28 sec I got at 4519 already.
P4C800 Deluxe Rev2 16x289 5:4 2-2-2-5 on the 29 sec run. I should have done more shutting down of processes. I found out later Turbo was off.
mem and stab modded
original bios 1101 or 1011. new board, was testing the high end.
my little stab at it.
very nice Kunaak :slobber: :D
it's prommy cooled?
Here my baby ...
Barton @2.59 gig :D not so fast like Kunaak but it's only a Barton
http://mitglied.lycos.de/martinteich...pi_38sec_2.jpg
my particular benchmark was done with dry ice.Quote:
Originally posted by Learn
very nice Kunaak :slobber: :D
it's prommy cooled?
not much else, besides a Vdimm and VDD mod.
:D
http://bravo.ausgamers.com/a64/3200/36seconds-2373.jpg
36 seconds @ 2.5-4-4-9 @ 2373 (10x 237mhz FSB 1:1 @ 1.65v).
31s
with A64 2,71GHz (VapoXE) and 2*256MB KHX3200 @ 271 2-2-2-5
Mine at 11x260 11-2-2-2-2,0-13-16 :)
Mine after taking mobo from Hipro5 (thanks my friend), changing cpu and gas at promie:D
Here's my A64 effort
http://users.tpg.com.au/spark69/an50r/superpi31.jpg
Just scraped in under 31 sec ;)
Talking about Super-Pi...here's my newest one......
with my 3.4C vapo chilled
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/1Mo..jpg
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/2Mo.JPG
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/4Mo.JPG
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/8Mo.JPG
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/16Mo.JPG
http://membres.lycos.fr/cpulloverclock79/32Mo.JPG
that is one hell of job, cpulloverclock.
here's my M-barton 2400+@ 2.88ghz @ 250 fsb..
34 sec.
@ cpulloverclock:
:confused: Your rails in sig are a joke, aren't they? :D
2.8C at 14x250 5:4 mem:
41 seconds.
FX51 ->Mach1,, 2x Corsair PC400 ECC Reg. LL,, SK8N...
http://www.dark-tweaker.com/yabbse/a...ents/pi_1M.jpg
Hoschi :D
No, that's real ;)Quote:
Originally posted by SAE
@ cpulloverclock:
:confused: Your rails in sig are a joke, aren't they? :D
@Hoschi.
Congrats my man. Landsmann :D
Nice results. Expensive rig, isn't it ;) ?
Haven't postet it yet, here's my ol 2.4C on chilled Water -10°C ;)
http://mitglied.lycos.de/coolinglimi...uperPI_324.png
really impressive dude!!! :slobber: :DQuote:
Originally posted by cpulloverclock
with my 3.4C vapo chilled
What temps do u have? Is that only a small Vapo ?? unbeleavable i think u're joking! :p:
@ultron5
Nice ram oc on your p4 :D (with superb timings)
I assume it's at least a vapo pe if not xe that cpulloverclock is using :)
P.S. Welcome to the sickness ;)
Finnaly got 32 seconds:D
A64 3000+ @ 2920Mhzs Mushkin Level II DDR 487Mhzs
http://pwp.netcabo.pt/orlandojdr/32s.jpg
why is it that p4's seem to do better in this test?
Because it has Dual Channel, and mems are very important for SuperPI.Quote:
Originally posted by Iridium192_217
why is it that p4's seem to do better in this test?
Look at the FX-51 scores, they're better than the P4 ones.
Quote:
Originally posted by Iridium192_217
why is it that p4's seem to do better in this test?
you´re wrong their buddy..
Remember you have to compare the right cpu´s - amd64 vs. p4 and the P4ee vs. FX..
in both AMD is ahead :)
damn I need better cooling. I can do 240fsb but the superpi time doesn't change.
Here's my 37sec at 3759.
new cooling :)
http://learn.chez.tiscali.fr/34s-DOD-R22.png
new cpu :)
need some tweak
DOD R22
http://membres.lycos.fr/ftpad/images/3.0C/superpi1M.png
Très bon!!, mon ami. :up: