Nuclearus - New Build - Benchmarks

Printable View

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-16-2007, 01:01 AM
SOLDNER-MOFO64

1 Attachment(s)

Got myself a small boost....7676 :)

--------------------------------------

ALL UPDATED
06-16-2007, 04:31 AM
tictac

AB9 Pro
e6320
2 x 1GB Team Value 667
6200tc 256mb
Stock board
Bios 17 official

Vcore : 1.43V
Vdimm : 2.3V
VMCH : 1.45V
VICH : 1.25V

FSB : 457MHz
Strap : 1033
Dram ration : 1:1
Timing : 4-4-4-8-18-36-2T

12272

http://img.techpowerup.org/070616/ab9-nuclearus2.jpg
06-16-2007, 04:33 AM
tictac

so need ver 2 to validate? ok will download it. :yepp:
06-16-2007, 07:49 AM
Tsunami Fall

Heres my second attempt, Going to try and break 8k soon :)

http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/2370/test2hd5.jpg
06-16-2007, 01:58 PM
ReaperX

One from me,@400x9 with 1.42V.

http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/9...clearushu8.jpg
06-18-2007, 12:13 AM
evoic

I'd like to add my name to the list.
If the list has been updated recently, I think I'm the top E6400 / E6420. :)

11,149

http://i58.photobucket.com/albums/g2...1149-CPUZa.jpg
06-18-2007, 08:24 AM
ceemic

evoic, look at my e6400 score: http://ceemic.pri.ee/c2d/nmc11445.JPG ;)
06-18-2007, 12:52 PM
evoic

Quote:

Originally Posted by ceemic

evoic, look at my e6400 score: http://ceemic.pri.ee/c2d/nmc11445.JPG ;)

ceemic....look at my score and look at my VERSION. ;)
06-19-2007, 04:36 AM
ceemic

There's a mistake on "score list": I have e6400, not e6600!
06-19-2007, 08:31 AM
evoic

Quote:

Originally Posted by ceemic

There's a mistake on "score list": I have e6400, not e6600!

You're still not understanding properly.
You scored 11,445 using Nuclearus version 1.2.1, the new version is the one that is required to be added to the list.

Version 2.0.0

That's the version I used when I hit 11,149.

You may still score higher, but you have to score higher with the correct version to make it count. ;)
06-19-2007, 12:53 PM
Lane-k

Not tweaked.. just for try @4.2ghz
http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/5...nstitresz6.png
06-19-2007, 01:12 PM
xtant25

1 Attachment(s)

Here is mine Pentium D 820 @ 3850 using a gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 (rev1.3)
06-20-2007, 09:45 AM
N00B

My bench on the Asrock 4coreDual.

E6420@2440Mhz
Asrock 4coreDual-VSTA
Team Xtreem 8500
6800le Agp
Lc Power 550w

Got to get my E6420@Ds4.

http://img125.imageshack.us/img125/4...clearusuf8.jpg
06-21-2007, 12:13 PM
Kashelz

1 Attachment(s)

Ok, here is update from me, 12.7k is what I get max for now :) I just changed onother CPU to test with and went 4+ Ghz!

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...1&d=1182456725

And I cant understand, how can get E6600 @ only 3.463GHz and get 12,722??? :shocked: :shrug: Its 587 Mhz lower Mhz but scores more by 11 points? WTF? What I do wrong? :rolleyes:
06-21-2007, 01:32 PM
freakBYnature

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kashelz

And I cant understand, how can get E6600 @ only 3.463GHz and get 12,722??? :shocked: :shrug: Its 587 Mhz lower Mhz but scores more by 11 points? WTF? What I do wrong? :rolleyes:

Here's some mind food.... try to play a game... say S.T.A.L.K.E.R. for about 30 minutes, exit, take the bench... write down the score... then reboot, wait until all your services has started... take the bench again... see a difference? 3DMark atleast works like that... always a better score on a fresh reboot.
06-21-2007, 02:03 PM
Kashelz

Quote:

Originally Posted by freakBYnature

Here's some mind food.... try to play a game... say S.T.A.L.K.E.R. for about 30 minutes, exit, take the bench... write down the score... then reboot, wait until all your services has started... take the bench again... see a difference? 3DMark atleast works like that... always a better score on a fresh reboot.

I always run benchmark on fresh load of windows, I think its better and more memory then is free, and 4.05Ghz on water is not so stable to play hard games :ROTF: Any more suggestions what tweaks to do?
06-21-2007, 03:08 PM
freakBYnature

Sounds like you have a bottleneck-problem to me, but may be many things. If your cpu don't pass orthos it simply means that it don't calculates correct, and that is all a cpu is ment to do.... calculate stuff... so, if the wrong calculations get bottled up all the time then .... you see? That may be the reason for you clocking down getting more juice, since your RAM and CPU works more at an optimum at the lower clock + the cpu calculates correctly every cycle instead of every 1000nd cycle :)

I'm not sure how you are supposed to tweak it any more than what I just explained, I'm not familiar with neither your board, cpu or ram.... maybe it's time to go intel on my ass? :)
06-21-2007, 03:32 PM
evoic

Quote:

Originally Posted by freakBYnature

.... maybe it's time to go intel on my ass? :)

I had an Opty 146 @ 2.4 - 2.6Ghz that I loved in an extremely solid system.

I sold it to go dual core and I stuck with my beloved AMD by purchasing an X2 4400+.

I noticed absolutely zero performance increase and I was pissed.
Pissed enough that I decided to join the dark side and bought and Intel system.

The difference is night and day.
It pained me to say that for the first few weeks, but these days it's a point of pride.
Intel made an amazing CPU line and people get WAY more than they pay for when they plunk down the greenbacks for a C2D processor. (IMHO)
.
.
06-22-2007, 02:33 AM
Cheffy

this benchmark will complete fine (and higher) for me at much above whats actually even slightly stable.

i can get 3100mhz stable for orthos... but even wow bails in a few mins.
this will on a good day and with flowing wind complete at 3220mhz with the same voltage, even while im getting explorer errors and random program lockups...
06-22-2007, 07:01 AM
Kashelz

Quote:

Originally Posted by freakBYnature

Sounds like you have a bottleneck-problem to me, but may be many things. If your cpu don't pass orthos it simply means that it don't calculates correct, and that is all a cpu is ment to do.... calculate stuff... so, if the wrong calculations get bottled up all the time then .... you see? That may be the reason for you clocking down getting more juice, since your RAM and CPU works more at an optimum at the lower clock + the cpu calculates correctly every cycle instead of every 1000nd cycle :)

I'm not sure how you are supposed to tweak it any more than what I just explained, I'm not familiar with neither your board, cpu or ram.... maybe it's time to go intel on my ass? :)

No, it cant be correct! I have Xeon 3060 @ 3700 Mhz for 24/7, its with 1.4v under TAT 30min load, no errors, all is completly stable like Orthos 8+ hours, TAT full load and other software that I have tested! And all is fast, maybe my OS is slow, I have not reinstaled it quit long time... And even my CPU @ stable 3.7Ghz is much slower than E6600 @ 3.4GHz, cant understand why, basically they both are the same CPUs :up:
06-24-2007, 01:56 AM
pmp

kiełbasa squad results below.
seems that nuclearus is picky.
better results was done using ram@1200 while lower was done on 1000/4.

http://strony.aster.pl/pmpcfg/PC/nuclearus/1.jpg
http://strony.aster.pl/pmpcfg/PC/nuc...arus-27764.jpg

Hmm, i compared two version - one which i used for above, and current one. this bench sucks as results are pretty different ;(

http://strony.aster.pl/pmpcfg/PC/nuc..._2.0.0_rc1.jpg
06-24-2007, 03:05 AM
Jaan

Locki, I've tested now v2.0RC1 with 1/2/4/8 cpu system and I can tell you, that the less cores means more stable MultiThr bench result.
For 8-core sytem I have up to 2000 points delta- this is not good.
And ALU test result is allways better for the first time bench, MT is usualy not. FPU result stability is OK.
So imo bench is still need impromens for result stability (MultiThread part of it) :rolleyes:

A few result from me too:
singlecore
old ES CedarMill 631@6510MHz/1,712V/LN2 -181,7- -180,0*C during bench (no cold bug :yepp: ) Forget remove maxmem=600, so maybe it is a reason for slow result:
http://www.oc.pri.ee/631/631-Nuclearus@6510MHz-6922.png

and 8-cores result- Intel V8 system, all default. (8cores@3GHz)
http://www.oc.pri.ee/Nuclearus/nuc2.0RC1_V8-26714.png
This FB-RAM is so slooow :down:
06-24-2007, 06:06 AM
Locki

Jaan! expressly for yor powerfool system, I made new build "NMCv2 RC2!" with tabsheet "options" where you can increase duration of all subtest... by 1..100 times
http://cp.people.overclockers.ru/cgi...clearMCrc2.rar
06-27-2007, 11:39 PM
aspms*

Here's my first 13K run:

Rig:

C2D E6600 L629F @ 4.12Ghz 1.63V
CPU coling: Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme + Sharkoon Silent Eagle 2000
Gigabyte P35-DS4 @F3
2x1Gb Crucial 10th Anniversary edition @ 572 5-5-5-8 2.2V (I'll try later to reach the same frequency with higher voltage and CL4 timings :cool: )

http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/9246/000036ctaa9.jpg
06-30-2007, 02:16 PM
Lancer33

1 Attachment(s)

Second AMD?
07-01-2007, 04:00 AM
Cheffy

Improvement, jut enough to pip demonbane!

ignore the reported cpu speed, i was winding up fsb in background (abit uGuru - 265mhz FSB = 3180)

http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/4415/untitledez2.jpg
07-06-2007, 09:24 PM
GOZ

1 Attachment(s)

Got more out of it
07-08-2007, 02:55 AM
awdrifter

Here's mine.
http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/1...clearusge8.jpg
07-08-2007, 07:53 AM
benktlottie

Heres mine! 17440

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y15...ie/3420Nuc.jpg
07-08-2007, 12:29 PM
evoic

I'm beginning to think this thread is only updated once per month. :(
07-08-2007, 07:23 PM
F1N3ST

8200 Even at 2.66Ghz with E6300 380 FSB x 7 4-4-4-9 1:1 (Mem dividers dont work yet)
07-08-2007, 10:52 PM
dfcmw

1 Attachment(s)

I'm a noob but thought I would have a go just for fun.
07-08-2007, 11:14 PM
evoic

Quote:

Originally Posted by dfcmw

I'm a noob but thought I would have a go just for fun.

People with lapped Q6700's, 4GB RAM, and 4xHDD in RAID-0 are hardly what I would consider n00b's.....:rolleyes: :D :p:

Nice score.
Nice rig.
.....interesting choice for video card.
07-08-2007, 11:55 PM
dfcmw

1 Attachment(s)

Quote:

Originally Posted by evoic

People with lapped Q6700's, 4GB RAM, and 4xHDD in RAID-0 are hardly what I would consider n00b's.....:rolleyes: :D :p:

Nice score.
Nice rig.
.....interesting choice for video card.

I have done a lot of research over the last few weeks to try to figure out how to OC. About the video card.. I use the machine for work and don't really need video card performance. The oc'ing and raid is purely for Photoshop (and the like) speed to make my workflow quicker. I have to admit though that OC'ing is quicly becoming a hobby!

Anyway, I decided I didn't want to rank behind a C2D so I did a re run.

Here tis...;)
07-09-2007, 01:01 AM
death

Death intel e6600 @2.4 real speed [3734] = 11753
07-09-2007, 01:03 AM
Cheffy

Soldner is currently Banned, this is why no update.

i dunno any more that that. i assume he will be back soon :)
07-09-2007, 01:05 AM
death

lol soldner ftw is he ever not banned
07-09-2007, 04:54 PM
BILKO1

Thought i'd give it a go:D not bad for standard air cooler:eek:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...wvoltsbest.jpg
07-11-2007, 06:19 AM
BILKO1

New memory:) only cheap ballistix 8500 but its good.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...CKING/best.jpg
07-11-2007, 07:42 AM
dfcmw

1 Attachment(s)

Yeah...I need new memory too. I'm runnin 533 stuff. Still had another go and pushed the score up a bit with a few tries.:)
07-12-2007, 02:46 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Raptor22

Intel Pentium D 820 @ 3450MHz (crappy 945P OC wall...)
07-12-2007, 07:59 PM
Shagg

Very nice desktop you got there :)
07-12-2007, 08:07 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Her name is Arielle Kebbel, here's the link: http://wallpaperstock.net/arielle-ke...ers_w3140.html
07-13-2007, 05:11 AM
freakBYnature

1 Attachment(s)

Score on my un-overclocked HP dv6060ea laptop.

CPU AMD Turion TL52 (1600mhz)
1024mb DDR2-667mhz RAM 5-5-5-15 1T
07-14-2007, 12:38 AM
RAW-Raptor22

Quote:

Originally Posted by freakBYnature

Score on my un-overclocked HP dv6060ea laptop.

CPU AMD Turion TL52 (1600mhz)
1024mb DDR2-667mhz RAM 5-5-5-15 1T

Nice for an older lappy!

Can you OC it? Clockgen? Anything?
07-14-2007, 12:56 AM
RAW-Raptor22

Here's my other PC:

1200MHz Tualatin Celeron @ 1400MHz Full Time OC

256kb L2 Cache

1726Marks!
07-14-2007, 04:06 AM
Cheffy

maybe soldner can add a Laptop ranking?
and/or a "last generations" ranking eg, X2/FX/C2D/P4D in 1 grp, P4,A64 (Clawhammers),AXP in another, T-Birds/Early P4/P3 in another and K6's P2's pocket calculators and the abbacus in the last group

*edit*
laptop scores 3740.
Clawhammer 3400+ @2200mhz
1gig PC3200 @ 3-3-3-8 400mhz
its a Clevo D470K sold by Rockdirect
07-14-2007, 09:52 AM
RAW-Raptor22

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cheffy

maybe soldner can add a Laptop ranking?
and/or a "last generations" ranking eg, X2/FX/C2D/P4D in 1 grp, P4,A64 (Clawhammers),AXP in another, T-Birds/Early P4/P3 in another and K6's P2's pocket calculators and the abbacus in the last group

*edit*
laptop scores 3740.
Clawhammer 3400+ @2200mhz
1gig PC3200 @ 3-3-3-8 400mhz
its a Clevo D470K sold by Rockdirect

Sorry Cheffy. I have to sig that... LOL
07-14-2007, 06:16 PM
MsB

here ya go 17026
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a3.../desktoppy.jpg
07-15-2007, 02:34 AM
freakBYnature

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raptor22

Nice for an older lappy!

Can you OC it? Clockgen? Anything?

Tried clockgen, and seemingly works, but it only reads from Nvidia C51 and when I clock it up nothing happens... systool won't work, I install it, but it crashes when I try to run it. I didn't bother any more when both those failed, will probably try something else, just don't know what yet... and older? It's only a year old, it's not like one of those pentium mobile "let's fry an egg on it"-cpu's :rofl:
07-16-2007, 10:00 PM
NewClocker

1 Attachment(s)

core 2 duo e6420 2.9 not serious oc to ram
07-26-2007, 01:56 AM
onick

11251

Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.60Ghz

http://img124.imagevenue.com/loc928/..._122_928lo.jpg
07-26-2007, 05:16 AM
Krid P

I'm a noob but I gave it a try... please don't laugh :)

http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d1...mi/results.jpg
07-26-2007, 08:47 AM
NewClocker

1 Attachment(s)

A small change in score
07-26-2007, 04:27 PM
jebo_4jc

Wow cool. I'll have to check this benchmark out when I get home and get my g0 Q6600 installed :)
07-29-2007, 04:14 AM
Ivan Os

http://www.imagesforme.com/images/8412nuc.JPG
08-03-2007, 12:32 PM
Tom|Nbk

http://img184.imageshack.us/img184/2...clearuswa1.png

Done with specs in sig. :)
08-03-2007, 12:45 PM
ultralord910

Done with BSEL modded e4400 :)

http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/996/scorewy3.png
Shot at 2007-08-03
08-03-2007, 12:46 PM
ultralord910

Sorry, laggy internet
08-07-2007, 06:10 AM
FlawleZ

Some more SC weaksauce...

Pretty much the limits of my air cooled setup.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...8NuclearMC.jpg
08-08-2007, 09:05 AM
mup0

I cant download 2.0.0.0 build..so i give my result at 1.0.0.Final version!

http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/7195/8kfh0.jpg

Box cooling!
08-08-2007, 09:27 AM
Verisimilitude

He is banned, he might not update with your results.
08-08-2007, 09:53 AM
FlawleZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by mup0

I cant download 2.0.0.0 build..so i give my result at 1.0.0.Final version!

Box cooling!

How's that 2160 feel in everyday use? SuperPi results? They appear to be great bang for buck as my brother is thinking about buying one.
08-08-2007, 02:13 PM
speedfreak86

1 Attachment(s)

Updated for the new system build(sorry for the quality, accidentally saved as 16 color bitmap):
08-09-2007, 11:51 AM
ChiLlInGw/H2o

My 1st go @ it
[img=http://img112.imageshack.us/img112/33/nuclearusie6.th.jpg]
08-10-2007, 02:32 AM
SOLDNER-MOFO64

I'm back :up:

Thread update in roughly 1 hour :)
08-10-2007, 05:27 AM
The0men

Should be good for top 20 of dual cores... nothing spec though for e66

volts are insane.. was just testing what it could take... thought id nuclear aswell... its from a while back.
http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/6485/nuclearfv6.jpg
08-10-2007, 09:54 AM
mup0

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlawleZ

How's that 2160 feel in everyday use? SuperPi results? They appear to be great bang for buck as my brother is thinking about buying one.

Its grate:)I will post some results..

Update:

http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/9...ltimarkym0.jpg
08-12-2007, 01:49 AM
KingThot

http://img355.imageshack.us/img355/3...cordwo6.th.jpg

6520 w/ Celeron 440 I believe that's SC record for now. I'll get a better score in a bit, need to tweak mem & voltages.

Got a little better:

http://img355.imageshack.us/img355/6...cordng6.th.jpg
08-12-2007, 08:41 AM
FlawleZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by KingThot

http://img355.imageshack.us/img355/3...cordwo6.th.jpg

6520 w/ Celeron 440 I believe that's SC record for now. I'll get a better score in a bit, need to tweak mem & voltages.

Got a little better:

http://img355.imageshack.us/img355/6...cordng6.th.jpg

Nice score dude. No surprise the single core champion would be on Core Architecture. What kind of Super Pi times do you get?
08-12-2007, 08:42 AM
FlawleZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by SOLDNER-MOFO64

I'm back :up:

Thread update in roughly 1 hour :)

Update still? ;)
08-12-2007, 09:42 PM
RAW-Raptor22

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlawleZ

Nice score dude. No surprise the single core champion would be on Core Architecture. What kind of Super Pi times do you get?

The "Core" CPUs are actually P6 architecture. :D :up: :)
08-13-2007, 12:31 AM
KingThot

Quote:

Originally Posted by FlawleZ

Nice score dude. No surprise the single core champion would be on Core Architecture. What kind of Super Pi times do you get?

Terrible ones. I think vista is to blame.
08-14-2007, 01:29 AM
Monstru

3 Attachment(s)

I recently did a clock per clock test between San Diego 3700+ and Conroe E6600, and I included this benchmark in my test. I have to say, it really uses multi-cores, which i find extremely pleasing. Below you can find my results from that test:

San Diego 3700+ @ 2750Mhz
2Gb Kingmax DDR400 @ 200 2,5-3-3-7 2T
Asus A8N-Sli

score: 4733

Conroe E6600 @ 2754Mhz
2Gb Mushkin XP6400 @ 460Mhz 5-5-5-15 2T
Dfi Infinity P-965 S

score: 8746
08-15-2007, 01:07 PM
SF3D

1 Attachment(s)

Here is my result with quad.

QX6800 G0 @ 4.7GHz

Attachment 62957
08-18-2007, 11:59 PM
Rone

E4300 @ 3.3GHz | 4x1GB @ 457MHZ 4-4-4-12

http://upload.infinityx.nl/Nuclearus.gif
08-19-2007, 12:46 PM
FlawleZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by Monstru

I recently did a clock per clock test between San Diego 3700+ and Conroe E6600, and I included this benchmark in my test. I have to say, it really uses multi-cores, which i find extremely pleasing. Below you can find my results from that test:

score: 8746[/B]

Well a more accurate test of how well the multicore threading affects the score would of course be best benchmarked with an AMD X2 @ 2.7 and your 3700+ @ 2.7. Either way, the NuclearMC seems to scale very well with multiple cores.
08-19-2007, 03:21 PM
Jiu-jitsuGOD

heres mine

whats up flawlez ? :)

13183

http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/1...nchmarkus3.jpg
08-20-2007, 07:16 AM
FlawleZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jiu-jitsuGOD

heres mine

whats up flawlez ? :)

13183

Ahh...yes! Finally! Now are you sure you can't give it another shot at maybe 3.4 Ghz? :D
08-20-2007, 09:23 AM
Jiu-jitsuGOD

I can actually hit 3.6 stable now but its way to hot till I add my triple 120mm rad..are they updating this anymore?
08-20-2007, 09:25 AM
FlawleZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jiu-jitsuGOD

I can actually hit 3.6 stable now but its way to hot till I add my triple 120mm rad..are they updating this anymore?

Those are great numbers man. And I'm working on that as we speak...
08-20-2007, 09:30 AM
Jiu-jitsuGOD

here is my official score at 3.2 use this one the other one had tons of stuff running

http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/1384/nukbenchqx2.jpg
08-21-2007, 05:10 AM
CraptacularOne

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jiu-jitsuGOD

I can actually hit 3.6 stable now but its way to hot till I add my triple 120mm rad..are they updating this anymore?

3.6Ghz "STABLE"? At what volts? 1.8v? lol.... Seriously, I would like to see a CPU-Z validation of that...even if it is at insane temps....
08-21-2007, 07:26 AM
FlawleZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by CraptacularOne

3.6Ghz "STABLE"? At what volts? 1.8v? lol.... Seriously, I would like to see a CPU-Z validation of that...even if it is at insane temps....

I believe a CPU-Z validation wouldn't be the issue. It's probably looping the CPU for 24+ hours that would be.
08-21-2007, 11:14 AM
Dublin_Gunner

lol

You guys all posting on this thread is hilarious!

I got 10308 with all sorts of crap running in the bacground & bioshock currently downloading.

Will post a screenie of a proper run later.
08-21-2007, 11:31 AM
Jiu-jitsuGOD

Hey crapface I cant keep it stable because the the things is hotter than your wife in my bed. so i had to keep it turned down till i get my new radiator..lol they don't update the damn score anyway been here for 3 days...
08-21-2007, 11:46 AM
Dublin_Gunner

**off topic**

Is craps missus hot?
08-21-2007, 11:59 AM
Jiu-jitsuGOD

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dublin_Gunner

**off topic**

Is craps missus hot?

Ive only seen the back of her...lol
08-21-2007, 12:11 PM
Dublin_Gunner

lmfao!

:slapass: :kissbutt:
08-21-2007, 12:45 PM
CraptacularOne

@ Jiu jitsu:banana::banana::banana:, the only thing you've seen the back of is my hand after I pimp slapped you for even looking at my wife....lol

@ Dublin_Gunner yes she is, that is why Mark is fantasizing again.....
08-21-2007, 02:56 PM
FlawleZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dublin_Gunner

lol

You guys all posting on this thread is hilarious!

I got 10308 with all sorts of crap running in the bacground & bioshock currently downloading.

Will post a screenie of a proper run later.

That's not bad. I'm going to run my brother's E4500 probably later tonight. Hopefully break 10K, but we'll see.
08-21-2007, 07:43 PM
Jiu-jitsuGOD

like I said Ive never seen her ..lol
08-21-2007, 07:54 PM
Magnj

here's the score for the settings I run every day
http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1435/...24e20b64_b.jpg
08-23-2007, 08:12 PM
Jiu-jitsuGOD

there was absolutely no reason to put scores up on here. Im never listening to Flawlez again
08-23-2007, 10:16 PM
freakBYnature

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jiu-jitsuGOD

Hey crapface I cant keep it stable because the the things is hotter than your wife in my bed. so i had to keep it turned down till i get my new radiator..lol they don't update the damn score anyway been here for 3 days...

You know, just because someone else is teasing you... don't know you have to snap on to the lure, 3.6 GHz is much, so instead of being so goddamn mad you could overnight it with orthos instead so we all could see that what you say is right. In accordance to a cpu-z validator of course ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jiu-jitsuGOD

there was absolutely no reason to put scores up on here. Im never listening to Flawlez again

You've put out scores, but no proof, so for all I know you've got none ... :rolleyes:
08-23-2007, 10:49 PM
freakBYnature

1 Attachment(s)

Like this:

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=233694
08-24-2007, 06:05 AM
SOLDNER-MOFO64

okay guys, been snowed under with work recently.......but I'll defo update this thread this weekend (sat). There are some pretty awesome scores here....thanx for submitting guys and sorry again for the delay in updating.

MOFO
08-24-2007, 11:38 AM
FlawleZ

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jiu-jitsuGOD

there was absolutely no reason to put scores up on here. Im never listening to Flawlez again

Easy Mark..just because the thread starter hasn't updated doesn't mean it isn't a legitimate benchmark. Honestly, I was just trying to help you feel better about your quad setup because frankly, there isn't jack $h|t for games that tell me that a multicore system is a "must have" at this point. ;) I'm still enjoying maxing games out with my lowly single core.
08-24-2007, 12:23 PM
Jiu-jitsuGOD

Quote:

Originally Posted by freakBYnature

You know, just because someone else is teasing you... don't know you have to snap on to the lure, 3.6 GHz is much, so instead of being so goddamn mad you could overnight it with orthos instead so we all could see that what you say is right. In accordance to a cpu-z validator of course ;)

You've put out scores, but no proof, so for all I know you've got none ... :rolleyes:

first! I know craptacular personally.. so I was joking with him... ;) and giving him a hard time ....second! I know flawlez personally as well I guess its just hard to detect sarcasm online...

I put out scores at 3.2 and posted pics I doubt I need more proof for that....:rolleyes: as mentioned when I rebuild my h2o cooling I will post at 3.6 with cpu-z.. for now i cant do it. my cooling sucks.

ps no offense to mofo64 I was just agrevating flawlez about it not updating take your time.....
08-24-2007, 12:40 PM
SOLDNER-MOFO64

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jiu-jitsuGOD

first! I know craptacular personally.. so I was joking with him... ;) and giving him a hard time ....second! I know flawlez personally as well I guess its just hard to detect sarcasm online...

I put out scores at 3.2 and posted pics I doubt I need more proof for that....:rolleyes: as mentioned when I rebuild my h2o cooling I will post at 3.6 with cpu-z.. for now i cant do it. my cooling sucks.

ps no offense to mofo64 I was just agrevating flawlez about it not updating take your time.....

Hey it cool buddy, I'm just takin' it easy with the first night off work I've had in ages. I'll get this thread updated first thing in the morning :)

I actually do a blinding job usually with all my threads (I have 3 Nuclearus threads alone....nevermind the 3D MARK 06 threads over at OCUK to look after)....but alas the rent has needed paying lately and god knows these new Phenoms most likely won't be cheap so we gotta get the hours in you know? :)

Cheers for submitting and all.....much appreciated ;)

MOFO

Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:37 AM.

XtremeSystems