Thank you, appreciated
Printable View
Thank you, appreciated
Anytime! :toast:
I just put in a 3200+ Venice, here's the stepping
ADA3200 DAA4BP
LBBLE 0517GPPW
Z644446E50150
Everything I've read about the GXXX chips is that they don't overclock too good. At 2.4 GHz (240x10) mine locked after just a couple of loops of car/lobby high on 3D01. Been priming stable (small FFTs) for about half an hour now at 245x10 with 1.4 Vcore in BIOS. That seems a little high for that speed, maybe this batch does suck?
ive been having some fun with my 3000+ LBBLE 0517 APJW recently.
my real reason for running this is to find its max speed i can run aquamark in, since im trying to break 14k.
right now i have it running at 2786mhz at 1.504v 1m and aquamark stable. the highest 1m was 2792, but aquamark locked up at this speed. i never tried anything other than 1m, as i just wanted it stable enough to run aquamark.
i was wondering what would be the highest voltage i could run though it on air.
right now it's at 9x309 1:1 with my OCZ memory @ 2.5-4-3-8.
any help to get to my goal of 14k with it would be welcome.
with a TT Big Typhoon, give it some volts. You can go to 1.6V no problems and many people go higher, 1.65(+). Personally i would keep it under 1.65... keep an eye on temps!
Umm, 14k? Isn't an average aquamark score for a system like yours more like 60-75k?
funny it says 70,500 in his sig, 14K must be a typo. Anyway most APJWs are pretty good (except my 2nd one!) so i've got faith that he can do more if it gives it more voltage.
i have a similar cpu:Quote:
Originally Posted by DB72
ADA3000DAA4BP
LBBLE 0517 GPIW
Z644398E51532
stock 1.35V
now at 1.55v 9x280
but i had to get rid off that heatspreader to reach that.
14k wasn't a typo.
@ the end of the test they have a scoring breakdown, giving a graphics, CPU, and Overall score. i am trying to see how high i can push my CPU, and im trying to get over 14k with my venice by that score
my highest score so far is AquaMark Score: 70483 (CPU: 13585, GFX: 9516)
my stock run i made on it was AquaMark Score: 54658 (CPU: 9261, GFX: 7752)
@ex2cib
Those cpu numbers look to be very close to sandra 2005 cpu scores :D at stock 2ghz I get 9300mips and overclocked I get 13500mips wonder if there using the same test.
local store only has 0516 GPBW and 0519 cpu's.... (3000+)
Any chance of a good clocker?
C
forget week 16 =[
both my week16s overclocked better than my week19s,
0516EPEW 2.7GHZ 1.6VCORE
0516EGPW 2.67GHZ 1.6VCORE
0519CPJW 2.6GHZ 1.6VCORE
0519BPEW 2.7GHZ 1.72VCORE
Man I've had nothing but "BL" with these venice chips :slapass: :bsod: .
Just paid for a LBBLE 0517APCW from ebay. I think the guy has more. We'll see how well it does on air and under TEC, but I'll have to wait for one of the two big crossfire boards.
Just bought an Venice 3200+ 0520BPMW
Will post OC potential when I have it up and running :)
9x312 (2808MHz) primestable 15 hours @ 1.5v :woot:
2900 didn't work, tried up to 1.6 volts, which BSOD'd within 5-10 minutes.
Currently at 9x312 @ 1.456v.
Seems like I couldn't even get my 0518APFW LBBLE stable at 2.6GHz even with 1.7+ volts :( I'm getting rather disappointed honestly....as you can see in my sig I have the new socket939 nf3 board from DFI so to say the least it's a bit flakey, but regardless I'm still seeing people hitting 2.7 and 2.8GHz with various venices and san diegos....mines being stubborn and I'm having to prime it at a measly 2.4GHz right now with 1.5 + .4 in the vcore options which registers about 1.675 according to voltage monitors....that much voltage on the earlier venices I've seen are hitting 2.8GHz+ easily and I don't know if that'll be happening for me.....freakin sucks
week 18s and 19s seem worst to me. There are quite a few 16s that are still pretty decent and a few 20s that are pretty good. Its a nice board anyhow.
Was that Pcclub by any chance? My local Pcclub has a load of week 16s,.....almost all gpbw. Even though it is a week 16, they are probably among the better week 16s available. I bought one, running at 2.88Ghz / 1.63 Vcore on Neo2.Quote:
Originally Posted by charlie
I'd not be surprised.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nubius
My old 3000+ 0516CPBW needed 1.5v for 2.4GHz, and 2.7GHz was a no goal, even with 1.7v++++ it was far from the stability.
Good luck
It's totally different for Aquamark CPU scoring than Sandra, but some processors are more similar than others. What kind of Aquamark3 CPU score are you getting at your overclocked settings, 4rory?Quote:
Originally Posted by 4rory
I heard 20's were pretty bad...Quote:
week 18s and 19s seem worst to me. There are quite a few 16s that are still pretty decent and a few 20s that are pretty good. Its a nice board anyhow
Anywho...I've tinkered with this DFI board more and I think I'm starting to get a feel for her...
When I had the CPU VID Manually set at 1.55 + .4, it wouldn't give 2.4GHz the time of day...
now...I've left the CPU Vid at pass through mode and have simply been raising the voltage adjustment and it seems to be doing a lot better.
Currently running 260x9.5 = 2.475GHz and it's running smoother than it has been any other time...voltage registering at about 1.55 compared to it's 1.7v with the VID manually set and it still wasn't stable at all....it's been running prime95 for 6 hours now while I watch shows on my computer, ran SuperPI, opened CPU-Z and photoshop all at the same time...no doubt this is part because of the BIOS being quirky.
My RAM seems to top out at 275MHz 2.5-3-3-7-2T 3v (1T will NOT work...I've heard some having luck with the yellow slots in this board but I haven't tried it yet) I tried 2.5-4-3-8 timings and it was BSOD's...this was at 275x9....now at 260x9.5 which is about 5Mhz less than 275x9 it's running strong....
My water coolings heatercore barb gets in the way of my RAM slots unfortunately so I don't know how easily I'd be able to change them over.
So perhaps this week 18 venice isn't too shabby....won't start pushing it more until tomorrow but it's doing pretty good at 2.475GHz right now at 1.55v so I'm really hoping I can get to 2.6+
Sorry for reporting a tad more than just the venice OC's :p
Oh sorry i've never run aquamark :S is it worth running how big is the download and installed sizes? And what will it tell me over other programs?
I like aquamark. it isn't a big download and it's really indicative of game performance. It's influenced by CPU, GPU, and memory. Good benchmark IMO. last time i ran it i got 82K but i was totally unoptimized and my drivers weren't good for it.
Well could get my week 19 to run more than 2479 kinda dissapointed. On the other hand atleast im using the rated speed of my memory. Not sure if i want to take a gamble and get another cpu, maybe a 3000+.
Id try giving it more volts but this board wont go over 1.45:mad:
Another thing is i cant get it to run at this speed in the bios, wont even post. Runs fine in windows though, go figure.
I primed it for 8 hours while i slept, sorry no screenshots of that, wasnt thinking.
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y14...alsloan/oc.jpg