10.9 5850 stock
http://i51.tinypic.com/2w5242s.jpg
10.9 5850 900/1050 6870 clocks
http://i52.tinypic.com/v3lpxy.jpg
Pretty much the same:rolleyes:
10.9 5850 stock
http://i51.tinypic.com/2w5242s.jpg
10.9 5850 900/1050 6870 clocks
http://i52.tinypic.com/v3lpxy.jpg
Pretty much the same:rolleyes:
ok thx ;)
We now need to see if it will get any different results in Extreme Tessellation setting.
Well, one more day to go
try with the same clock on cpu as wellQuote:
Originally Posted by slaveondope
regards
Minimum frames are better with 5850 and 10.9 than 6870
one more from GigaByte 6870
http://galeon.com/civicsport16/heaven_oc.JPG
Heaven doesnt benefit from increased cpu clocks its one of the best benchmarks for GPU's regardless of platform;)Quote:
Originally Posted by hugin72
the GPU in there is not a 6870, it's a GTX 460, check the screen capture.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aten-Ra
Interesting
So assuming those leaked 6870 benches were real, then in Heaven at least, 6870 @ 900 Mhz w/ 1120 SP's = 5850 @ 900 Mhz w/ 1440 SP's... hmm
Interestingly enough, 1440 is 288x5 whereas 1120 is 280x4, if we are assuming that 4D is nearly the same efficiency as 5D, assuming no other changes were made
So ironically this just asked more questions.. is it more efficient front end, or did SP's get tweaked?
from what the rumors suggest, Bart XT still uses the same 5-way shaders. Cayman is rumored to bring the new 4D layout.
Yes, I'm aware of the current rumorsQuote:
Originally Posted by Florinmocanu
Of course, the current rumors are changing every hour :ROTF:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aten-Ra
So much fun :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Florinmocanu
It's actually already on sale on Malaysia (one store, limited stock) for RM 700 and 790 (6850 and 6870 respectively).
GTX460 1 GB costs around RM 700 here.
Good point. It could simply be a more efficient 4D design. Or perhaps it is a result of the improved tessellator.Quote:
Originally Posted by zerazax
Tomorrow will be interesting for sure.
That's cheap!Quote:
Originally Posted by blindbox
XFX prices here are 329/389 SGD :o
lol so true, reading fail :rofl:Quote:
Originally Posted by Metroid
Nice.Quote:
Originally Posted by kaktus1907
they tested with Forceware 258.96 = Boo
and overclocked GTX460 @765/3700MHz = Boo
it says GT 240 ?
Is this a bug or I'm actually seen it right? :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by cold2010
Edit: I'm going to bed, too tired to laugh. :(
its also incomparable resultsQuote:
Originally Posted by Metroid
nvidia: 8xAA and 4xAF vs:
ATI: 0xAA/4xAF or 8xAA/16xAF
its not the same as any, although close to the second one.
HD 6870 > GT 240???
And the filters are differents.
Image 1: 1920x1080 noAA 4xAF
Image 2: 1920x1080 8xAA 16xAF
Image 3: 1920x1080 8xAA 4xAF
sorry , This SourcesQuote:
Originally Posted by kaktus1907
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.p...postcount=3694
http://forum.beyond3d.com/showpost.p...postcount=3696
Now we maybe looking at something different:)Quote:
Originally Posted by cold2010
10.9 5850 900/1050 for comparison on efficiency all assuming its legit;)
http://i51.tinypic.com/2qk1fo6.jpg
http://i55.tinypic.com/n3lso3.jpg
did you do them yourself? then thanks, can we get stock speeds too?Quote:
Originally Posted by slaveondope
its looking like extreme preset is indeed handling better for 6800s, but it also looks like heavy AA is handled better on 5800s