Quote:
Originally Posted by Caveman787
looks nice! glad you posted that again because i saw the thread w/ just his stock scores but none of the oc's... can someone ask him about temps? i registered but cant post yet.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caveman787
looks nice! glad you posted that again because i saw the thread w/ just his stock scores but none of the oc's... can someone ask him about temps? i registered but cant post yet.
Anyone noticed crazy HT and NB speeds??!!
2678MHz HTT / 2678MHZ NB / 4017MHz Core :D
I like them very much!
BTW it looks like I will be coming back to water cooling pretty soon :yepp:
the temp sensor seem faulty to meQuote:
Originally Posted by crazydiamond
when it was on Coolermaster v8 air cooler
stock vcore(1.35v), overdrive reading 22c?
bios reading 42v
so i poked a thermal probe to IHS and i got 32c:shrug:
1.56v under water
in bios reading 44c
27xx is capable:DQuote:
Originally Posted by Lightman
yes, can't wait to get mine...put it under my water...should be some fun....:woot:Quote:
Originally Posted by Lightman
I have the Apogee H2O 220 kit all stock with rad and 2 fans. keeps my Phenom 9950 nice and cool, but add in a Vid card and the NB..I don't think mine would cut it. You might need to step it up a notch.Quote:
Originally Posted by crazydiamond
here is 3ghz stock v's and 3.3ghz 1.44v
http://3800z24.info/Phenom/idle_temps.JPG
http://3800z24.info/Phenom/9950/32bi...p1.44vIdle.JPG
Temps are only close to real temps around 55°C. Others are synthetic and may not scale correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by coolice
he added pics on the first page just a min. ago. looks right to me.....what do you guys think?Quote:
Originally Posted by flippin_waffles
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...omputers/2.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...omputers/1.jpg
Scared of what the nb volts are and nb and mosfet temps assuming their not water cooled of course.
Heard of some horror stories of them blowing out at high volts etc. Wish they had a nice msi style tons 0' heatpipe cooling solution for nb/mosfet/southbridge like on the msi p45. Even overclocked that performed well at keeping temps good.
Hmm, clearly that can't be retail then if it was made in June '08 can it? But aren't ES samples blank with no writing? Seems a bit strange, but what do I know!
The Phenom in the picture has less pins than the Athlon (I count 2) so for me it looks right too (AM3 has 938 pins while AM2(+) has 940). :)Quote:
Originally Posted by charged3800z24
yah i see 938 pins, but why doesn't it say "Phenom II" on the IHS?
Maybe this chip was made before they came up with the name? Just a lame guess... :shrug:Quote:
Originally Posted by jaredpace
Yeah, maybe it is true. Jonspd said this on Ocforums:
http://www.ocforums.com/showpost.php...&postcount=210Quote:
just bought a PII 945 BE es
xmas came early to bad waiting on bank transfer and it's coming from out of the US..
yea thats what i am guessing. it is most likely an old chip probably an earlier revision unlike the C3 revision which the 945 will launch as. it seems kinda legit but still this is kinda odd that this chip would come out of no where and they are expected for a long time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Karolis
Alot of AMD's newer ES's seem to use some weird kind of production code. By looking at the PN I can see it's a 1-way desktop CPU, which sounds very reasonable since it has pins. It's also a 3GHZ piece, which is promising - and what we'd expect. The only thing that looks a bit unusual to me is the last 3 numbers, but that's a different story...
To sum it up: that CPU IS an AM3 Phenom II!
Yep,it appears so :)Quote:
Originally Posted by knopflerbruce
EDIT:
Oh man,i've just seen this :shocked: :
http://www.ocxtreme.org/forumenus/sh...?t=4302&page=2
coolice posted his 5.5Ghz score,canard validation link :
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=466730
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/screenshot/466730.png
This is just 9% shy of those 6Ghz scores we saw at the demo.Considering this is one of the first OCing attempts it's very impressive!
Here is my 5.6 :D http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=466799
Hah you beat coolice by 100Mhz,nice job :D.
I am a little disappointed. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by crazydiamond
Check the CPU score (and overall) in 3DM06.
I just checked my stored benches at the ORB, and did a quick run with my Q9450@3.6 (Abit iX38 QGT) paired with HD3850x2.
Link here
I had hoped a Phenom II @ 4Ghz + HD4870 easily should beat that. :(
Here's a great source for comparison
http://www.hardwarezone.com/articles...521&cid=2&pg=8
http://www.hardwarezone.com/articles...521&cid=2&pg=9
CPU bound benchmarks on stock clocks...
CineBench 10 32-bit
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 ... 11165
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 ... 10506
Phenom II X4 ................. 9754
3Mark06 CPU score
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 .... 4783
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 .... 4483
Phenom II X4 ................... 4483
Aquamark3 CPU score
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 .... 19129
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 .... 18117
Phenom II X4 ................... 15745
Those Expreview leaked AMD slides are for real after all. ;)
??? not one of those links gives a comparison.. They are all Intel??
A great source with DDR2-800 vs DDR3-1333. Ehh.
6120.44 MHz by dread77 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=466047
6020.16 MHz by Oktabit Team http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=465848
5985.16 MHz by JtChen2002 http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=464705
Congrats :up:
But the race isn't over... it's just beginning :D
The OCW review has PII @ over 12k 3dmark 06Quote:
Originally Posted by Macadamia
Edit: sorry was looking at overall :)