it couldnt.
im seeing a part that goes inbetween that looks like an injector of some sort.
Printable View
"taking a seat"
thanks andy when you can i'd really apreciate those messurements as well.
now everyone is glued to the screen hitting refresh every 10 seconds...lol
not really.
The block will perform within 2-3C either better or worse then the EK.
Im more waiting on martin's flow test to see what the drop is. Next gen top tier gaming machines will be dual socket. 2-3C wont matter squat when your cooling 2 processors. Its the pressure drop that should be more of a concern.
Having 2 supremes wont help you in that area. Well not unless your like me and you know how to plan it.
Toss some popcorn my way, I'm sitting on a pack of beer :)
That long?
Ah i see, u wasted time hugging ur wife and smoking.... :mad:
:p:
Great work andy, keep at it! :cool:
:rofl:
in your own world my friend. EK > D-tek. Can we just end it?
My EK will probably spank this GTZ even. Well im using custom accelerators. :rofl:
My Cuplex will probably beat this GTZ as well, thats if martin finished stepping it.
Gabe you need to step the block and not bow it. Scott definitely discovered a winner.
Only problem tho, once stepped the block can never be used on neha since the die package is different.
What! :eek:
Well well.... just get going :p:
Thanks for the clarification, I've just noticed on some other blocks that generaly the orientation of the nozzles needed to match the core orientation for optimum cooling so I assumed this would be the same. It doesn't matter for the quad which is what I'm testing anyhow.
Have you guys tried a thicker o-ring in the V2 as a modified block test?
I've got one in mine, and need to go back and run stock now, but I think the additional bowing helps a fair amount.
It also probably depends on the TIM material used. The TIM consultants TC Grease 0098 stuff seems to a metter TIM interface that some of the others I've tried and showing less gain on bowing than non-bowed blocks. It's pretty thick stuff though, and I've had to adopt a spread thin method for consistent and optimal performance with it.
Anyhow, my GTZ sample won't be here for a couple more days, I'm sitting here with popcorn too...Actually I've got 8 block sets of runs done and still have several to go and several modified tests I want to run as part of my review package. Then I've got to go back and retest the "As Shipped" which is going to take a while and a little case modification work to add to the list.
Are you done...yet?...:D