delete this
Printable View
delete this
Unfortunately it looks like theres not going to be any custom Titan cards, nor unlocked voltage modding from the AIBs. Limited production too which strongly implies reference designs only, and then when they are gone, they are gone.Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOAethyr
Voltage will be adjustable, no worries.
I would like to point out that the GTX 690 was originally described as a "limited edition" card but is still in production months later. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by bhavv
I think limited edition at these high price brackets more or less means availability limited to those who are willing to pony up the clams for the hardware.Quote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
I hope all reviewers who bench 3-way SLI with Titan try to avoid CPU bottlenecks. 4K anyone? :)
Maybe, but remember:Quote:
Originally Posted by highoctane
- ARES II: 1000 unit production = limited edition
- GTX 690: ongoing production = expensive yet available
- PowerColor HD 7990 (non Devil 13): ongoing production = expensive yet available
I'm sure there will be the standard 1080P reviews lol. 3x Titan's suck!Quote:
Originally Posted by boxleitnerb
Crysis 2Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboDiv
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: 68 %
GeForce GTX 680: 65 %
GeForce GTX Titan: 100 %
----------------
GeForce GTX Titan vs Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: (100/68)*100 = 147 % = 47 % faster
GeForce GTX Titan vs GeForce GTX 680: (100/65)*100 = 154 % = 54 % faster
3DMark 2013 X Firestrike
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: 77 %
GeForce GTX 680: 67 %
GeForce GTX Titan: 100 %
----------------
GeForce GTX Titan vs Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: (100/77)*100 = 130 % = 30 % faster
GeForce GTX Titan vs GeForce GTX 680: (100/67)*100 = 149 % = 49 % faster
3DMark Vantage GPU
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: 76 %
GeForce GTX 680: 81 %
GeForce GTX Titan: 100 %
----------------
GeForce GTX Titan vs Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: (100/76)*100 = 132 % = 32 % faster
GeForce GTX Titan vs GeForce GTX 680: (100/81)*100 = 124 % = 24 % faster
Battlefield 3
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: 74 %
GeForce GTX 680: 65 %
GeForce GTX Titan: 100 %
----------------
GeForce GTX Titan vs Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: (100/74)*100 = 135 % = 35 % faster
GeForce GTX Titan vs GeForce GTX 680: (100/65)*100 = 154 % = 54 % faster
Far Cry 3
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: 70 %
GeForce GTX 680: 73 %
GeForce GTX Titan: 100 %
----------------
GeForce GTX Titan vs Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: (100/70)*100 = 143 % = 43 % faster
GeForce GTX Titan vs GeForce GTX 680: (100/73)*100 = 137 % = 37 % faster
Hitman
Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: 81 %
GeForce GTX 680: 73 %
GeForce GTX Titan: 100 %
----------------
GeForce GTX Titan vs Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: (100/81)*100 = 124 % = 24 % faster
GeForce GTX Titan vs GeForce GTX 680: (100/73)*100 = 137 % = 37 % faster
Conclusion
GeForce GTX Titan average increase over Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition: (47 + 30 + 32 + 35 + 43 + 24) / 6 = 35 %
GeForce GTX Titan average increase over GeForce GTX 680: (54 + 49 + 24 + 54 + 37 + 37) / 6 = 42.5 %
All benchmarks done with drivers so premature they aren't even launch day drivers... Either 3DMark is way off the ball, or drivers are going to show some massive improvements as the scores I've seen in 3DMark paint a much more favourable picture. As I said, I haven't got game performance info, so I can't comment on the accuracy of the above.
Very nice improvements across the board over 7970 and 680. It looks like NV will fire the first bullet,let's see if AMD can dodge it :D. From AMD's camp there ain't much coming in this year so I doubt they will have an answer with single GPU solution. Maybe an official 7990 part will launch to rival 690 and new Titan.
Yea i was wrong...
I found it this way for Crysis 2:
(100-65/65)х 100 = 53.8%
NVIDIA Feel like this now
http://www.abload.de/img/sbylu8wsqb.gif
AMD Feel like this now
http://www.abload.de/img/2vwsca.gif
and you will feel like this with TITAN
http://www.abload.de/img/pbsqd5ns9u.gif
It surprises me that people still fail that much in math for such simple things :eek:
I don't think the math is all that important at the moment, we'll have to wait and see.
And besides, it's not like we're trying to establish a gate through a black hole lol...
http://www.abload.de/img/gtxtitan-nvidia90f5b.png
thx to my Friend ;)
Math is basic logic. If you're trying to make an argument.... how can you possibly expect to even be arguing the same thing, let alone have anyone take you seriously, if you cannot utilize those constructs? (This isn't aimed at you, but more of an "in general" response to your remarks.)Quote:
Originally Posted by NEOAethyr
^^ Either jealous, or not serious.
I was just thinking that if prices came down on the GTX 690s, I might want to get one after getting a 680 replacement today, but then I checked tri SLI benchmarks and No way jose.Quote:
Originally Posted by SKYMTL
And I doubt there will be any price drops, but usually there is after new stuff is released.
AMD fanboy.
I was really ready to buy one of these as a replacement for my GTX 580. But if these benchmarks are close to the truth, I don't see me paying the price of 3 (!!!) 7970 GHZ cards for this (they cost 350 Euro over here, and you get even cool games with them).
so today was wrong ???
How good is NV multi-gpu scaling these days? Can I expect +90% or better for each additional card?
@bill_d
Today was never right. It was an internet rumor run amok. However, today is the day that specs got released.
We should have more information soon. Fudzilla reports release tomorrow, some other sites say the 21st.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bill_d
http://www.nordichardware.se/Grafik/...-februari.htmlQuote:
Nvidia will launch its new flagship graphics card Geforce GTX Titan on February 21 after being told on Feb. 19 allows the media to publish pictures and details of the new card. Performance tests and complete tests therefore show up two days later.
you know how funny the sounds that one was a internet rumor followed by ........ Fudzilla reports :p:Quote:
Originally Posted by 3lfk1ng
Fudzilla big noob :down:
nordichardware big dogg :up: