btw, maybe can help added new info in format:
CPU, batch(series), cooling, screenshot
example: FX 8150, 1140DPM, watter, SCREENSHOT or link to screenshot
Printable View
btw, maybe can help added new info in format:
CPU, batch(series), cooling, screenshot
example: FX 8150, 1140DPM, watter, SCREENSHOT or link to screenshot
Maybe something like this? Anything else??
Notice: Above is FAKE DATA, For testing only!Code:
Name Score CPU CPU MHz NB MHz Cooling Ram MHz Timings OS Mobo ScreenShot
001 FlanK3r /999 19.36 X8 FX-8450 (1140DPM) 5432 4200 H20 DDR3 @ 866 9-9-9-9-24-1T Win7-64 Asus CF VI n/a
002 VoodooProphetII /328 10.45 X6 1090T 6026 2400 LN2 DDR3 @ 800 9-9-9-9-24-1T Win7-64 Asus CF IV 002
yes, excelent!Lol, me with 19.36 in R11.5 :p:
WOW!!!! Magical score on that 8450 FlanK3r... :shocked: :rofl:
I knew you had connections, but I didn't think you had access to future chips! :p:
J/K ReKcOlNu, I know it was just a demo, but it would be nice to have such info. If your up for all the work involved. :up:
hehe :D
anyone try setting AOD/taskmanger to realtime priority I'm getting different scores lol
7.04 normal set in taskmanger.
7.14 very high in taskmanger
7.34 realtime set in AOD. it's scarey cause you only see it finish lol
all runs done at 4.4ghz.
yes, priority make sense, sometimes more, sometimes not big differences.
Hey Infra, I know this is a little OT for this thread, but I was testing some new mem tonight and saw the same wierdness with L2 read in AIDA64... :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by I.nfraR.ed
It actually distracted me from my mem clocks for awhile. My instinct suggested it was realated to the HTRef clock (but it wasn't)!
Anyway, I think I've figured it out!
I was getting an L2 read ~17k again. With just a slight bump on Vcore (.0125v) it jumped back up to 45k... :shocked:
If you see that happen again would you mind trying it (bumping Vcore) and see if it has the same effect on your rig?
Just thought I'd throw it out there for anyone else who may experience it.
I haven't tested to see if it has any real effect on performance or not, it just makes me feel better.... :D
Zeus, I think you are right...Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
This seems to happen with X6 as well when paired with the new microcode.
I'd been running 2040 CAS 6 but I noticed AIDA performance sucked really bad...I realized my results with Hypers from before were ~1000 MB/s better. Then sometimes, if my OC fails my machine won't boot anymore. I can't get it to boot at all, even after cycling ~20+ times. I cleared CMOS and started over, then I had that 1900 Mhz wall I had before...tried DOCP profile and drive strengths to no avail. Magically I was able to do 2000 again, after OC'ing with DOCP and stock NB multi/CPU multi. Now I'm at the same 2040 and realized my AIDA results are ~700 MB/s higher than they were before with same settings.
Now I have higher performance...without changing anything.
Oh, by the way :D ...just wanted to let everyone know I purchased an FX-8150 (not for performance, Counter-Strike:Source will inevitably run slower) but to play with. I'm selling my 1100T as well and hoping to get a second hand 1090T to replace it soon.
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/6770/saeer.png
found this on AMDzone
always wonder what is scored.
low clock Mangs cours 8 core
my guess would be this on clocking. TDP with out limits lol
3.0ghz one would score 6.98
4.0ghz would score 9.3
5.0ghz 11.6
did anyone notice mangs cours are prices about 40% higher then interlago's ? O_o ?
Your math is incorrect, double the cpu speed does not mean double the score. :nono:
:rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
:)Quote:
Originally Posted by FlanK3r
Maybe for CineBench 12.x, for now just gonna stay with this.
Heres FX only update,
Code:Name /Post# Score Cooling CPU MHz ScreenShot
01 FlanK3r /647 9.57 LN2 X8 FX-8120 5885 01
02 Dumo /461 8.85 1-Stage X8 FX-8150 5418 02
03 Daveburt714 /582 8.84 H20 X8 FX-8120 5389 03
04 equinox1 /445 8.72 H20 X8 FX-8120 5331 04
05 krjalone /556 8.65 H20 X8 FX-8150 5310 05
06 Zeus /550 8.60 H20 X8 FX-8120 5250 06
07 I.nfraR.ed /621 8.57 H20 X8 FX-8150 5226 07
08 Asmola /618 8.50 H20 X8 FX-8150 5168 08
09 wez /530 8.45 H20 X8 FX-8120 5140 09
10 El Gappo /411 8.34 AIR X8 FX-8150 5090 10
11 Barr3l Rid3r /638 8.31 - X8 FX-8120 5060 11
12 blossa /620 8.26 AIR X8 FX-8150 5051 12
13 Particle /511 8.24 DICE X8 FX-8120 5235 13
14 PatRaceTin /646 8.23 H20 X8 FX-8120 5033 14
15 PolRoger /515 8.18 AIR X8 FX-8150 5017 15
16 charged3800z24 /512 8.16 H20 X8 FX-8120 5017 16
17 sandlewood /500 7.55 - X8 FX-8150 4823 17
18 Baam /486 6.99 - X8 FX-8120 4275 18
19 gOtVoltage /521 6.14 H20 X6 FX-6100 5001 19
20 m411b /635 6.12 - X6 FX-6100 5003 20
21 The Stilt /510 4.29 AIR X4 FX-4100 5201 21
bah
i got high volt 8120 need 1.60V @ 5.0GHz
some rersults are really nice, I cant not reach 1.45V in R11.5 :(...So....5GHz R11.5 is only dream for me
Rolling your eyes cause it's not what you wanted to hear? Sorry but there's no lineair scaling in CB 11.5.Quote:
Originally Posted by demonkevy666
no because, your being a jacka$$Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
that was theoretical 4.0ghz 8 core manugs cours. -_-
So because it's a different cpu the scaling of CB score suddenly is lineair and i am a jacka$$? Interesting.
FX-8120 (default voltage = 1.3875V)
Batch 1141GPM (not really good)
Normal Water Cooling
http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8...racetin.th.png
I think, its maybe average chip, not bad...
Here is my new result:
AMD FX-8120 125W, 1140EPM, LN2 cooling (NB and RAM was not optimized), old Crosshair IV Extreem board :)
http://img846.imageshack.us/img846/4...mhz175vcin.png
Working on efficiency.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...115801crop.png
8 points at 4.85G doesn't looks too bad imho.
Now i only need some cold weather... :D
I have you listed for a 8150 also at post #602, screen shot here, but post doesn't exist, did you delete it Or did I screw up somewhere? :confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeus
No i did not delete anything afaik. Just delete the 8.12 of your chart and keep my best FX8150 result. (8.60) I also have a 8.62 result but it doesn't get me a place up so leave the 8.60 result please. ;)